A bit late to the party- but this is one of the finest papers I have read in years. It is both super cool science, and does the near impossible in our field: grounding insights about the evolution of molecular mechanism in the ecological arena in which they (presumably) arose. It's a masterpiece.
04.03.2026 13:16 β
π 20
π 3
π¬ 1
π 0
Researchers in the US might be having feelings about writing grants atm-I know I am!
We still need to write them. In this Evolution Exchange, I again chat with Sam Scheiner, who summarizes how to write a competitive proposal.
His advice is gold, and helpful regardless of funder. Pls RT!
02.03.2026 15:32 β
π 57
π 42
π¬ 2
π 0
The technical term is trampoline wormholes
01.03.2026 21:52 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
poison doesn't poison people, people poison people
06.01.2024 12:29 β
π 413
π 47
π¬ 9
π 2
Bimbo!
28.02.2026 01:14 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Weβre coming for the record!
28.02.2026 00:54 β
π 16
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I havenβt really spent that much time playing with 4.6, but it seems similar to 4.5. Which is an incredibly good model.
27.02.2026 21:40 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Iβd watch that!
27.02.2026 19:28 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Yes. But heβs playing both roles.
27.02.2026 11:37 β
π 5
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
This photo of Thibaut looks like a publicity photo for a new Apple Original series
27.02.2026 00:10 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
It was an amazing trip. A picture from our stroll through Lausanneβs vineyard region, as well as the other side of the fondue pot!
Thanks again for hosting me Omaya!
25.02.2026 07:08 β
π 5
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
How far back in time can you understand English?
An experiment in language change
If you liked this experiment, I published a full piece today in the same vein: a text that gets 100 years older with every section, from a modern blog post to a medieval chronicle.
It's a single story spanning 1000 years of English. See how far you get.
www.deadlanguagesociety.com/p/how-far-ba...
18.02.2026 18:40 β
π 3561
π 1296
π¬ 193
π 479
Damn it what mischief are my kinfolk up to?!
11.02.2026 20:22 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
Wow, Michael, thank you so much for the detailed questions and also kind words!
I think most of these questions are unanswered, but will be major areas of exploration over the coming century. The closest I know is this: www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....
Seems to fit your central hypothesis!
09.02.2026 16:55 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
Cooperation is a universal feature of complex systems, from the origins of life and microbiomes to societies. What universal patterns can be found in these systems? Here's our new @pnas.org paper. @jordipinero.bsky.social @artemyte.bsky.social @sfiscience.bsky.social www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10....
19.12.2025 18:44 β
π 75
π 30
π¬ 4
π 2
New round of NSF GRFP declines without review. If you were affected:
1) Write NSF
2) Write your Congressperson
3) CC us at grfp@grant-witness.us so we can compile + follow up
Details and template at grant-witness.us/grfp-letter
This is the link to the post: bsky.app/profile/noam...
05.02.2026 15:27 β
π 33
π 35
π¬ 0
π 3
Priority effects inhibit the repeated evolution of phototrophy - npj Complexity
npj Complexity - Priority effects inhibit the repeated evolution of phototrophy
New paper out - fun collaboration with @wcratcliff.bsky.social & led by the wonderful Tony Burnetti! IMO, a rare clear example identifying the mechanism underlying priority effects at macroevolutionary scales. Also, continuing to justify my PhD from a plant lab π
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
05.02.2026 19:45 β
π 19
π 5
π¬ 1
π 1
It was domesticated there!
05.02.2026 10:07 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Dang, I donβt know- if only Tony Burnetti were on BlueSky!
04.02.2026 15:04 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Good q! They donβt!
All rhodopsin based critters are either heterotrophs (and use rhodopsin as a facultative energy source) or also have chlorophotrophy too.
04.02.2026 14:31 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Very cool! Iβll have to watch when Iβm not chaperoning a field trip of rambunctious 5th graders!
04.02.2026 13:56 β
π 8
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Heβs one of a kind!
04.02.2026 12:12 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Sweet. Would love to chat about some time! You should talk with Tony too, this paper is absolutely his brainchild!
04.02.2026 12:00 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Yes! Only chlorophototrophs can fix carbon, which opens up totally different niche opportunities! Rhodopsins are like a little supplemental solar panel for a heterotroph.
04.02.2026 10:40 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Thanks man!
I think it still fits. The cyano hasnβt evolved a third type of photography has it?
04.02.2026 10:34 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I love this idea! Iβd be game.
04.02.2026 01:47 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
28/28 As always, we'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks for sticking around to the end!
03.02.2026 21:36 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 4
π 0
27/28 More broadly, this framework may apply to other apparent "evolutionary singularities." Eukaryogenesis. The origin of life itself. The evolution of animals. Events that happened once might not be improbable: they might simply have created priority effects that prevented repeats.
03.02.2026 21:36 β
π 8
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
26/28 If proto-chlorophototrophy appeared in a world with established retinalophototrophs, it could escape competitive exclusion by occupying the carbon fixation niche, something rhodopsins are chemically incapable of doing. Then it had time to optimize for energy metabolism too.
03.02.2026 21:36 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
25/28 This raises another question: why didn't whichever system evolved first simply exclude the second? Our model suggests retinalophototrophy likely came first. Here's why: chlorophototrophy can fix carbon. Rhodopsins cannot.
03.02.2026 21:36 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0