matilda.science

Matilda.science hits new milestones!
151.3 M works, 254.5 M texts, 12.3 M authors, all connected in an ever-growing research graph.

Citations in the graph: 174.6 M total, 41.1 M from full texts.

And we’re still growing!

#OpenScience #FAIRData @matilda-science.bsky.social @foxcubfr.bsky.social

We keep on growing, and that includes 26M publications with full-text search. No ID needed, everything is reusable and shareable #openscience #opendata

My PhD candidate Juan Pablo Bascur submitted one of his papers to MetaROR. The reviews of his paper have now been published on the platform.

Very glad to see early-career researchers embracing new approaches to scientific publishing!

a collection of hardcover books seen from above

Matilda has just passed two milestones: 150M different works are included and you can full-text search 25 millions of them We aim at 200M and 50M a year from now. matilda.science?l=en #scientificpublishing #opendata

Matilda already catches a few "give a positive review only" manuscripts, including one where the authors updated the ArXiv version in 2025 (publication in 2022). Note that the prompt is being put just before the "Introduction" part @samuelmoore.org @gcabanac.cpesr.fr matilda.science/search/?l=fr...

TSOSI will hopefully become a key platform to proudly show investment in #Openscience #infrastructure

Discovering and charting the black matter of citations. Matilda as a new source for OPen Citations.

We just presented the soon available pipeline from Matilda to @opencitations.bsky.social as we will be a new source for the OC infrastructure. The presentation and abstract will be on @cern.bsky.social Zenodo. #WOOC2025

Very interesting talks, many on citation extractions (including posters soon to be presented). We collectively need to be able to extract references independently from publishers #WOOC2025

Strategies to Improve Open Science Monitoring: Lessons from France's OSM initiative - The Scholarly Kitchen The French Open Science Monitor Initiative shows a path toward improving recognition of data sharing and open science assessment

In today’s @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social I interview Laetitia Bracco and Eric Jeangirard from the French #OpenScience Monitor about their work tracking open scientific outputs in scholarly literature #FOSM #OSMI

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/05/27/s...

"After going through two rounds of peer review, which is typical, the journal asked her to do something unusual: replace the word “equitably” and take out data reporting demographic makeup. “They asked us to remove that,” she said, citing compliance with an executive order."

Nuts!

Thanks for yours. I will send you numbers in advance (the full text number expands around 2.5M a month)

Our 155M are deduplicated; the full number of publications is 245 M. You can also use full-text search over 22M works without any personal ID or tracking systems, share alerts and results. matilda.science?l=en

G Scholar is more and more tainted. At Matilda, we do not have the same problem: we only rely on trusted sources (Crossref, ArXiv, Pubmed, HAL,...) for pub. and we closely control our enrichments. So less publications and less citations but legit ones #researchintegrity #Barcelonadeclaration #ORI

In Matilda, you will find already 26 "squared blunder", including some, like this one, followed by the wrong acronym. #researchintegrity matilda.science/search/?l=fr...

who says that science doesn't generate profit?

Nice piece. This is why we created Matilda: We will never charge for services, and everything is open data, so it is reusable and shareable, from search results to alets. Any feedback very welcome matilda.science?l=en

Matilda has just passed the 20 million mark for full-text search! Still a long way to go, but the goal is to make full text the standard for bibliographical search rather than metadata. matilda.science?l=en #scientificpublishing #opendata

Very interesting. As a non-commercial tool, of course, we will never do that. Everything will be available (of course, your government could block us as "black open access")

Censorship of locally-curated collections, readers and librarians may still use commercial tools. That is why we need open data everywhere, tagging preserved in many copies in various countries #openscience #openaccess

Automatic detection and extraction of key resources from tables in biomedical papers - BioData Mining Background Tables are useful information artifacts that allow easy detection of missing data and have been deployed by several publishers to improve the amount of information present for key resources...

Have you ever wondered why information in tables is so difficult to pull out of PDF files? Our paper on this topic was just released by the journal of BigDataMining, which may have editors who do not pass the Turning test, but at the reviewers were great. Thank You!
doi.org/10.1186/s130...

With pleasure. The email address is matilda_biblio@proton.me (contact on the home page). Thanks

🚀 Matilda.science, developed by @foxcubfr.bsky.social, keeps growing! With 144.7M deduplicated works, 241.9M texts, and 11.8M mapped authors, we’re shaping the future of bibliometrics. #OpenScience #FAIRData @matilda-science.bsky.social

We don't have a systematic corpus pre-2019 and we did not include "reference-only". If you have 250M papers (deduplicated?) (to our 144M), that looks proportionate.

We don't know whether more than 35k science papers with "Donald Trump" in it is a sign of hope or despair #standupforscience matilda.science/search/?l=fr...

The main problem with G Scholar is not what it indexes, rather you have no way to chack what is being indexed (and that it is easy to feed in whatever text). This is why we built Matilda on specific sources and you can retrace sources and enrichments (including pubmed ) matida.science?l=en

I just reviewed two papers. One was almost certainly written with heavy assistance from genAI. The other was full of missing, misleading and incorrect references, many apparently planted.

I suspected as much from the abstracts.

I hate that I have to spend time policing science.
#researchintegrity

You may try Matilda. We also built it in case other sources go down: matilda.science?l=en Any feedback very welcome

This is why we built Matilda matilda.science?l=en Any feedback welcome

Matilda is among the organizations supporting the Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information. A very fine collection of #openinfra and #openscience stakeholders barcelona-declaration.org/signatories/