@nessscissors.bsky.social
Anti-Fascist ๐ด | Lenin-Appreciating Anti-Sectarian Council Communist๐นโ๏ธ๐ฅ | Fuck Russia! Fuck Israel! Fuck America! | Educator, Historian | Twitter refugee | Chronic yapper | If you block me, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
This is the ideal way to structure the socialist mode of economic organization
28.03.2025 23:19 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0THE NESSITE PAMPHLET
- A complete guide to the anti-sectarian future of socialism
Please look at it, I think it's quite excellent as an introduction to my concept of Plural Socialism, the "why can't we just fucking get along" ideology.
pluralistsocialism.w3spaces.com
PLEASE READ AND REPOST THIS!!!!
- No third party alone will ever realistically win an election or take power by other means!
- Democrats are proven failures!
- MAGA is cartoonishly evil!
A unified alternative to both of the perceived "only options" must be presented to the American People!
I believe I have cooked.
16.03.2025 00:04 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Only that even regulated capitalism is objectively better than un regulated capitalism
It's only inferiority is that it discourages foreign investors
it's a youtube video lmao jfc
10.03.2025 20:39 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This is such a liberal attitude lmao
"I got mine, everyone else get bent, imperialism and genocide is bad only if the imperialists lose or aren't on my team"
Please, watch this.
Also, fuck millionaires. Don't care.
you wanna know why I'm a socialist? want to know why America is swirling down the drain of fascism and becoming ever more radical? want to know why Europe is doing slightly better in spite of having far fewer resources?
Watch this
youtu.be/gqtrNXdlraM?...
I'm not a marxist leninist, I hate them more than you do
10.03.2025 19:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0notice that Labour in the UK and the SPD are both pro-austerity neoliberals instead of social democratic parties now? it's because they've been bought by investors to whom they are now beholden
Sorry, not investors, "donators"
the problem being that with capital accumulation even in social democracies at a certain point you reach a threshold in which the capital class has enough wealth to essentially buy parties that were formerly stewards of the welfare state
10.03.2025 19:07 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0trve
10.03.2025 19:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I'm dominican-american
10.03.2025 19:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0As if every free market hasn't also imploded in on itself unless bailed out by INCREDIBLY SOCIALIST STATE INTERVENTION such as BAILOUTS *lighting cracks in the distance*
10.03.2025 18:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I'm not a Marxist-Leninist. Many ideological strains of Marxism don't follow the doctrine of Marxism-Leninism, which was invented by Stalin and is sometimes therefore called Stalinism, with continued variants including Mao Zedong thought and Jucheism.
I myself am a Councilist Marxist.
Marx even wrote about this.
So, they moved from State Capitalism to Free Market capitalism to successfully develop their economy and surpass the quality of life of their main competitors (which they have). So they could successfully transition to socialism, which they've begun to do.
Marx finished the Manifesto and several other works far, far longer than it. Ever heard of Das Kapital? Man, you're dense, huh?
China did this because it realized its attempt to move straight from feudalism to socialism couldn't work. You have to do capitalism before you can do socialism.
You see capitalism and democracy as linked because the capital class uses bourgeois democratic politics to give people like you the sense that they control their destinies. They don't. Capitalists own you.
Socialists advocate for genuine democracy, which requires the death of capitalism.
Social-democracy is not socialism because workers still do not control the means of production in social democracy, their bosses do.
Socialism must enforce the democratization of workspaces, the ability of workers to decide their pay, and to ensure they are not exploited.
Ceausescu was a fascist. If he'd lived to see the fall of communism, he'd have been a pure nationalist, a Putin-like figure. He only adhered to socialism because that was the order of the USSR, who only did so because that was the dogma they had been educated to parrot but never uphold.
10.03.2025 18:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They expelled the section of their party that was doing this shit and they formed their own, completely worthless party in the Bundestag. Die Linke is now basically just a Labour Party of the early 20th century.
You're either very uninformed, or you're being intentionally disingenuous.
Political power? in Soviet Communist states? No.
Economic power? somewhat? but also no, ultimately the party made the choices as to what went on in workplaces, not workers.
That's why it was a state capitalist system, not a genuine communist system or even socialist.
They had a state capitalist economy
10.03.2025 18:16 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Some communists have been brainwashed by Russian propaganda to think that the (real and concerning) Ukrainian affinity for Banderite aesthetics means Ukraine is inherently fascist, and that intervention is necessary. I am not one of them. Ukraine is a liberal republic.
10.03.2025 18:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Russia is an anti-communist, reactionary, far-right dictatorship that deserves zero praise.
10.03.2025 18:10 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0For real, fuck RuSSia
10.03.2025 18:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No real leftist likes or supports Russia
10.03.2025 18:07 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0