Clearly didnโt work on him
21.02.2026 19:25 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@danvisioni.bsky.social
Climate scientist studying aerosols, chemistry, radiation, climate & society from Volcanoes ๐and Climate Intervention. Assistant Professor at Cornell EAS, from ๐ฎ๐นproudly๐ณ๏ธโ๐ More at https://dan-visioni.github.io/ and https://www.wcrp-climate.org/ci-overview
Clearly didnโt work on him
21.02.2026 19:25 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Me, a super smart immortal wizard thousands of years old: mmmmh I wonder what that means
21.02.2026 17:22 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That is not remotely how you use standard deviation.
21.02.2026 16:49 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Release the Annatar files
21.02.2026 16:47 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Did u not read his manifesto David
21.02.2026 16:44 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Yeah pretty suspicious with their frequent flies from Middle Earth to Valinor Island, they should publish their flight schedulesโฆ
21.02.2026 16:43 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0When your friends ask you to check the weather forecasts for your nice lil camping trip in the mountains and you forget and then need to shift the blame:
21.02.2026 16:26 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Elves of old be like โyes nice letโs have the biggest safest doors the dwarves can build, weโll set the password guys donโt worryโ and then write the password on a post it note on top the door like the Louvre security.
21.02.2026 16:17 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh so now weโre normalizing unsafe working conditions in order to get promotions for our capitalist overlords uh smh
21.02.2026 16:12 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It has warmed my hearth to see we have reached over 200 signatures here :) Thank you to everyone who has put their name down. As this is picking up steam, together with other initiatives, and with some UCAR representatives, we're trying to make sure this reaches the general public, congress & NSF.
19.02.2026 19:05 โ ๐ 16 ๐ 9 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1We already have over 40 signatures from US researchers and professors supporting NSF-NCAR and telling NSF to maintain control of the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputer with NCAR! Do sign and share.
16.02.2026 14:26 โ ๐ 20 ๐ 12 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 2Feels a lot like the goose chasing meme. Ok but what are these values that, if represented, would make science better? Because definitely there are scientists that are more or less progressive, more tech-optimist, some are degrowthers, some are liberal, some Marxist, conservative economists existโฆ
14.02.2026 23:22 โ ๐ 11 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The most charitable interpretation would be to say โsince having right-wing values represented in science is important, then it is the fault of right partiesโs utter contempt for science for forsaking that chance at representationโ. But I still havenโt received an answer about what are these values.
14.02.2026 23:18 โ ๐ 15 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Completely arbitrary and silly (as you said)
14.02.2026 22:19 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0What does he mean the axis is truncated it starts at 0?? Where should it end, at 200??
14.02.2026 22:09 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Ok but that confuses the hell out of me and Iโve been here 8 years, can you imagine how confusing it must be to Hegset?
14.02.2026 19:36 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Right, itโs not like we donโt have a counterfactual right now of both what a right-leaning public space looks like (Twitter) and what a right-leaning science institution looks like (literally every institution in the US government right now??). Is science benefiting from Dr. Oz right-leaning views?
14.02.2026 18:47 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Ok but what are the right-wing -leaning views you think would lead to better science as a whole? Currently, in nutrition, donโt you think indeed the current Health Secretary is a powerful โinstitutionโ with a specific leaning? Is nutrition as a science improved by it? How about EPA and climate?
14.02.2026 18:32 โ ๐ 62 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0Iโm genuinely not trying to miss your point. Iโm asking you earnestly both what are the specific political views missing that will get us better science (is it different views on immigration? economy? physics?) and how does one get there-or rather whose responsibility is it to ensure that happens?
14.02.2026 17:13 โ ๐ 56 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0More broadly: what are the left-leaning views that are predominant in โscience institutionsโ and what bias do they produce? Is rigorous science possible in the current extremely right-leaning institutions like EPA, NIH or DOE? How does right-leaning climate science look like?
14.02.2026 17:02 โ ๐ 40 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I got that. So you are objecting to the intertwining-what is unfortunate, to you, is that science is primarily done by people with a specific bias. Iโm saying that itโs hard to see online spaces in which one could right now be right-leaning (whatvr that means: pro-ICE? anti-LBTQ?) and a scientist.
14.02.2026 17:02 โ ๐ 41 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Didnโt you say itโs โunfortunateโ? Sounds like an objection to it, to me!
14.02.2026 16:34 โ ๐ 58 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You say that โleft-leaning politics and science are intertwined hereโ. I donโt think climate physics is inherently political - yet there is only one party in the US who is hostile to me both for teaching it and for who I am as a human (a non-heterosexual immigrant). How do I dis-interwine myself?
14.02.2026 15:56 โ ๐ 77 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You id-ed it as โunfortunateโ, and that the consequences of that have policy implications that are โbadโ. Hence one might infer that, were they scientists concerned with good policy-making, it would be their duty to stay on that platform to avoid opinionists like you from assuming they are biased?
14.02.2026 15:51 โ ๐ 70 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Seeing that figure and concluding that to be less biased scientists should stay on a platform where they are constantly overwhelmed by abuse, and full of straight up nazis is an incredible form of victim blaming, especially considering the explicit attitudes of the current US government.
14.02.2026 15:34 โ ๐ 92 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sign our letter Costa bsky.app/profile/danv...
14.02.2026 03:31 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Nowhere near as boring as NY
14.02.2026 02:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Last December, weather and climate scientists sat down with us to tell us why they loved the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and why it benefits us all. Last night, the NSF began dismantling it. Listen to what they have to say, and why it's urgent that we #SaveNCAR wclivestream.com/act
13.02.2026 22:27 โ ๐ 63 ๐ 53 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 3Hey there, for now I was thinking of this as more aimed at US scientists/teachers, considering this is for NSF... but let's see where it goes :)
13.02.2026 23:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0