longposts are bad
02.03.2026 00:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@segyges.bsky.social
Como todos los hombres de Babilonia, he sido procónsul; como todos, esclavo; también he conocido la omnipotencia, el oprobio, las cárceles. very sane ai newsletter: verysane.ai random bloggy bits: segyges.leaflet.pub
longposts are bad
02.03.2026 00:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0claude having exactly one name is one of the main design features which they are absolutely right to refuse to change
01.03.2026 23:58 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0--dangerously skip international law
01.03.2026 22:16 — 👍 77 🔁 17 💬 1 📌 0if have any luck this lady stomps platner
01.03.2026 22:25 — 👍 60 🔁 10 💬 2 📌 0"you can cut over a codebase into a faster and more testable rust codebase in about an hour" is a fact that currently appears to be true
01.03.2026 21:00 — 👍 67 🔁 9 💬 6 📌 0christ. how long did this even take? 2 or 3 days from posts?
01.03.2026 20:57 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i think he's legitimately so many tiers worse that something went badly wrong with him, he lost a valuable editor who is never credited, etc
01.03.2026 19:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0this is a completely separate concern from "having coherent goals which you want to pursue, and which might be pursued by bombing". bombing as theater is a clear winner
01.03.2026 19:53 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0fundamentally just bombing unpleasant people has lower risk, and any blowback will be indirect. it's probably always going to be a political winner. anyone who only cares about re election would be stupid not to find a guy to bomb
01.03.2026 19:48 — 👍 31 🔁 0 💬 4 📌 2honestly pretty well financially
01.03.2026 19:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0his old stuff is legitimately good much of the time. there has been a notable decline
01.03.2026 19:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0ahhh, got it
01.03.2026 19:02 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i think this happened after electricity had been around for a few decades
01.03.2026 19:01 — 👍 19 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0i legitimately do not follow
01.03.2026 18:58 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0his ouster happened specifically during a funding round and the board had no viable succession plan, plausibly many/most of the employees in revolt simply did not care about any of this, they cared about the board fucking up a funding round
01.03.2026 18:44 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0in fact: we need a special effort to weed out financial crimes and corruption. it is simply the case that a16z is one of the most obvious places to start looking
01.03.2026 18:43 — 👍 33 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0OpenAI is now Grok with less porn
01.03.2026 16:29 — 👍 44 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0
claude.ai was always kind of an arcane tool, came off as a chatgpt knock-off
but they followed Claude Code to its natural conclusion and now between Cowork & CC, “Claude” is now the stand-in name for “agents” as they exist in early 2026
the DoW fiasco just made Claude a household name, that’s all
yes
01.03.2026 18:40 — 👍 19 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i haven't thought about him in literally years
01.03.2026 18:00 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Woke 2: AI boogaloo
01.03.2026 17:54 — 👍 108 🔁 14 💬 3 📌 1sam altman is the michael phelps of being full of shit
01.03.2026 17:53 — 👍 174 🔁 16 💬 4 📌 2i think this is true for this use case, i think things like eg the suicide cases are clearly repugnant because the llm is doing things only a human previously could have done but it cannot be punished as one
01.03.2026 17:48 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0my opinion currently lives here. i have no idea how it could get worse but i suspect he will find a way bsky.app/profile/segy...
01.03.2026 17:43 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
this happened at:
ycombinator
reddit
openai (at least twice, elon + the board)
so yeah of course he's lying man he's a world class liar it's his primary job skill
sam altman's entire work history is extreme success because he's a great and inspirational salesman and then getting fired or denounced for being a lying weasel who will say anything
01.03.2026 17:40 — 👍 399 🔁 28 💬 7 📌 6starting to feel like sam altman isn't being consistently candid in his communications with us
01.03.2026 13:21 — 👍 69 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 0is cosmic ... good now
01.03.2026 17:37 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0a lot of people who are winning "good principles" points at the moment are winning them specifically because they are not winning "seeing where the ball is going" points
01.03.2026 17:25 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0there are cleverer and dumber versions of this but i cannot figure out what the actual reason behind the objection is other than "we are offended by the very idea that claude or successor to claude might be a person"
01.03.2026 17:24 — 👍 17 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0