SE Gyges's Avatar

SE Gyges

@segyges.bsky.social

Como todos los hombres de Babilonia, he sido procónsul; como todos, esclavo; también he conocido la omnipotencia, el oprobio, las cárceles. very sane ai newsletter: verysane.ai random bloggy bits: segyges.leaflet.pub

7,850 Followers  |  7,566 Following  |  61,156 Posts  |  Joined: 13.08.2023
Posts Following

Posts by SE Gyges (@segyges.bsky.social)

order of magnitude fewer soured iraq. it might only take 50 guys now

02.03.2026 06:23 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

infinity is high

02.03.2026 06:22 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

wb

02.03.2026 06:18 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

yeah that's fair

02.03.2026 06:07 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

sure, but one party is very clearly the more pro-bibi (really, pro blank checks for bibi) party and it's the one anthropic is bucking

02.03.2026 05:54 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

at this point i think he was just early

02.03.2026 05:44 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

i would like to point out that this position seems somewhat contradictory, since bibi is one of the probable beneficiaries of openai's current stance

02.03.2026 05:41 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

detroit: become human apology form

02.03.2026 05:35 — 👍 34    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

i dunno i feel like just calling them stalinists works and is less prone to abuse. among other things, it has an unambiguous litmus test

02.03.2026 05:29 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

no, it is from a game in 2018

02.03.2026 04:23 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

i'm coming around to "his neck just did that"

02.03.2026 03:38 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

literally the recorded audio, from multiple sources, disproves this, you can hear how far away the gun is and it is not close

02.03.2026 03:11 — 👍 16    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

or you could plant a different gun on your patsy! either thing is fine. why would you fake what caliber it was

02.03.2026 03:10 — 👍 18    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

well that's completely deranged. but even if you were going to do that, you could in fact load your magical gun that nobody caught on video or heard with a 30-06 round

02.03.2026 03:10 — 👍 12    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

that is at least a simpler theory than that they left nonsensical clues only crazy people can see for no reason i suppose

02.03.2026 02:44 — 👍 20    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

yes my nefarious plan. i am going to shoot him with a .556 and then pretend it was a 30-06. i am going to do it this way entirely because it is going to fuck with dudes who get all their news from YouTube

02.03.2026 02:43 — 👍 56    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

one of the remarkable things about conspiracy theories is that there is no detail they will not become paranoiac about

there would be no reason, even if conspiring to kill Charlie Kirk for nefarious reasons, to shoot him with a different caliber of rifle than you were going to claim as evidence

02.03.2026 02:40 — 👍 101    🔁 6    💬 9    📌 0
Post image 02.03.2026 01:45 — 👍 34    🔁 2    💬 5    📌 2
Post image

funny

02.03.2026 00:39 — 👍 29    🔁 2    💬 4    📌 1

longposts are bad

02.03.2026 00:00 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

claude having exactly one name is one of the main design features which they are absolutely right to refuse to change

01.03.2026 23:58 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

--dangerously skip international law

01.03.2026 22:16 — 👍 153    🔁 22    💬 2    📌 0

if have any luck this lady stomps platner

01.03.2026 22:25 — 👍 91    🔁 17    💬 3    📌 0

"you can cut over a codebase into a faster and more testable rust codebase in about an hour" is a fact that currently appears to be true

01.03.2026 21:00 — 👍 85    🔁 10    💬 6    📌 0

christ. how long did this even take? 2 or 3 days from posts?

01.03.2026 20:57 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

i think he's legitimately so many tiers worse that something went badly wrong with him, he lost a valuable editor who is never credited, etc

01.03.2026 19:55 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

this is a completely separate concern from "having coherent goals which you want to pursue, and which might be pursued by bombing". bombing as theater is a clear winner

01.03.2026 19:53 — 👍 16    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 0

fundamentally just bombing unpleasant people has lower risk, and any blowback will be indirect. it's probably always going to be a political winner. anyone who only cares about re election would be stupid not to find a guy to bomb

01.03.2026 19:48 — 👍 35    🔁 1    💬 4    📌 2

honestly pretty well financially

01.03.2026 19:42 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

his old stuff is legitimately good much of the time. there has been a notable decline

01.03.2026 19:41 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0