llms should have native audio output so they can rap battle and we can determine the best lab that way
05.03.2026 01:31 — 👍 59 🔁 3 💬 4 📌 0@segyges.bsky.social
Como todos los hombres de Babilonia, he sido procónsul; como todos, esclavo; también he conocido la omnipotencia, el oprobio, las cárceles. very sane ai newsletter: verysane.ai random bloggy bits: segyges.leaflet.pub
llms should have native audio output so they can rap battle and we can determine the best lab that way
05.03.2026 01:31 — 👍 59 🔁 3 💬 4 📌 0please remember: he's not mad
05.03.2026 01:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Time to support trans Dems like @beth4ma.bsky.social
04.03.2026 22:36 — 👍 90 🔁 23 💬 1 📌 0lmfao
05.03.2026 01:09 — 👍 26 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0isn't he canadian
05.03.2026 00:47 — 👍 22 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0is this meme retro yet
05.03.2026 00:47 — 👍 28 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0an LLM is the plucked chicken for our age
05.03.2026 00:45 — 👍 18 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0*sufficient
05.03.2026 00:42 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
the tldr is that llms show sufficiently evidence of consciousness that it depends which definition of the word you use, even, which is probably a major source of the drama
like we basically mean "human-like" and they're clearly human-like in some ways but not others
for your consideration bsky.app/profile/segy...
05.03.2026 00:38 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0gun to my head? pull the trigger piglet
05.03.2026 00:23 — 👍 39 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0goddamnit. does someone else need to write a different, less wrong book
05.03.2026 00:17 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0i am basically filing that under "daddy musk is gonna take us all to mars with grok" but i should maybe have chosen a broader framing
05.03.2026 00:10 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
fuck me do i need to start showing up for AI events
i don't think i want to hang out with rationalists in my free time
yeah unfortunately yud and daniel, pictured here, might be literally the only professional opinion-havers who have an opinion about ai that is neither 1) it doesn't and never will work, and is racist as a basic idea, nor 2) daddy musk is gonna take us all to mars with grok
05.03.2026 00:07 — 👍 37 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0"where can i find the least credible person to talk about ai with"
05.03.2026 00:03 — 👍 44 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0
i hated ai 2027 but am convinced most of what i hated about it was scott actually. daniel's conduct has been completely aboveboard imho, even if i disagree with him and think he's sort of industry-brained
i don't want to have to argue with or about yud, it's disgraceful
daniel kokotajlo seems fine. i disagree with him about a bunch of stuff but he's, like, a sane person
04.03.2026 23:57 — 👍 24 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0this makes two times i have seen yud in film preaching doom to the masses recently and i am concerned this will become a pattern and we will end up seeing him on cnn a lot or something
04.03.2026 23:55 — 👍 53 🔁 2 💬 6 📌 1
bluesky hates this because it takes ai too seriously
i hate this because if you take your cues from yud you will end up ineffectually telling people not to do things they are definitely going to do
which maybe means it's a good fit for leftists, but
for the ball to hit me, it would have to come half the way to me. and then it would have to come half of the way remaining, and so on, infinitely. therefore "the ball is going to hit me" is impossible
04.03.2026 22:42 — 👍 57 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0brother i can see the ball. the ball is exactly half way between you and me. you're telling me it's going to hit me? you must be lying. do i look like i've been hit by a ball?
04.03.2026 22:41 — 👍 57 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0we have reached levels of inability to infer the ball's trajectory never before thought possible
04.03.2026 22:40 — 👍 81 🔁 5 💬 5 📌 0to put it another way: you might want to figure out what you want to tell him to do, because there's a chance he will do it
04.03.2026 22:31 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i just don't wanna have to spend a lot of time going "no, it's on the REMOTE, we need to run this on the REMOTE"
04.03.2026 22:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0kill your darlings (the vibecoded app that you don't care enough to maintain that would only be good for a 'huh, cool')
04.03.2026 21:06 — 👍 57 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0lmao rip
04.03.2026 21:05 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0huge
04.03.2026 21:05 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0can i offer you some partisanship in these trying times
04.03.2026 20:53 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0we need something that handles the thing being remote cleanly imho
04.03.2026 20:53 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0