Hier findest du jemanden, der das jedenfalls mit ner Autobahn macht...
21.11.2023 20:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@jerreu.bsky.social
Ad postremum proelium eamus iuncti et cras Laboratorum hymnus sociabit homines he/him
Hier findest du jemanden, der das jedenfalls mit ner Autobahn macht...
21.11.2023 20:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Differently: Not once has a responsible politician set their own ambition over the necessities of the state, which in turn makes them so responsible. This ofc holds true for both Trump and Biden who have opposing programs for what the nation needs.
16.11.2023 01:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0because the state sets and enables one's own condition for competition and survival.
16.11.2023 01:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0one confirms by voting for the 'lesser evil'.
Of course the error here lies in misunderstanding the 'nations necessities' as objective necessities and not what the nation 'owes itself' and in believing that the forthcoming of the nation is the same as your own forthcoming,
This argument is shared between all democratic debates everywhere and it is always nothing, but the admission that one is indeed totally subsumed under the interests of the state, whose necessity for the nation and thereby for oneself, who is the dependant variable of the nation,
16.11.2023 01:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But then apparently you see yourself not as the authoritative subject but solely the object and resource of your government, since to you the only question is that of the vote. Which is indeed true of course, but then again it is contradictory to, in such a position, afirm the state's power in votin
16.11.2023 01:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Only caring for a negative is absurd.
Obviously you both find that a Trump presidency would be bad for the nation and that things that are bad for the nation are bad. And lastly you apparently hold that you need someone to govern over you, placing your absolute trust in the Democrats
If you have such an anti-critical/anti-intellectual attitude towards the topic then why do you even care at all?
15.11.2023 18:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Dreiste LΓΌge!
15.11.2023 11:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Directly in opposition to your argument:
The Democratic Vote -
School of Nationalism
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/voting.htm
The vote β the free citizenβs moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The Vote β A Blank Check for State Power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
I implore you: Look at the nature of the vote, at the nature of the state.
Maybe, if you are interested, these polemic articles are helpful for forming a proper notion of the vote:
if you constantly ask the question: How can I best get by? The question is a mistake that makes any objective look on the matter at hand impossible. And thus you can only come to such a horrible conclusion: If you critique the vote you must actually want the opposition to win.
15.11.2023 08:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0When searching for alternatives, searching for the best way to get through in this life, you will never, because you can never, get to a proper notion of the ongoings in this world. You will never ask: Why is that, what is that? about such shitty things like the wages, or the vote, or war
15.11.2023 08:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0These are all insights into the objective nature of the state.
And what I meant is that if you have a proper notion of the state you will have a critique of it.
success in life depends on the success of the nation. This is made excruciatingly obvious in war, when the opposition between state and people becomes absolute *and* the peoples' very life depends on the interests and the sovereignty of the state as they become one.
15.11.2023 00:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It is the violence of the state, its definitory power that ensures, enshrines, oversees and cares for a system of competition, in which a vast majority are wholly expropriated and have but their capacity for work as a source of income and in which then the peoples'
15.11.2023 00:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I am not saying maybe critique rulership, what i meant to say was: Look at what a state objectively *is*. A monopoly on violence that by subjecting them defines a people who are then in turn (taxes, dying soldiers in war,...) the basis of the states power.
15.11.2023 00:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The conflict between Biden and Trump is not one of democracy and oligarchy or whatever, but a democratic fight over the correct utilization of american power for US interests and the morals of the nation and the alignment of the american state as a whole.
15.11.2023 00:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They don't want to institute some different horrific oligarchic (world) order. They already have their democratic world peace order. And if you actually meant that billionaires would then overtake all government power you simply misunderstand the relationship between capital and state.
15.11.2023 00:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0By this you mean that, if one does not vote, the powers that be will abandon this grandiose democracy and institute an oligarchy. I don't know where you get that idea from, considering that all I ever see is advocacy for more democracy in the world.
15.11.2023 00:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I am critiquing you, unless you did not mean the above comment seriously
15.11.2023 00:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This absolute opposition of people and state can be seen in war: The interests and existence of the state are fought out with the life of its citizens
What's so odd about that is that in war, by the own state and by the enemy, ones own survival is totally set in one with the enforcement of the state
It is wholly incredible how a critique of the vote and democracy can so reliably be understood as an endorsement of voting for the opposition. And conversely it's quite odd that a lot of people who criticize Biden in such a fashion are actually endorsing the state in the subjunctive mood.
14.11.2023 18:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some critiques concerning the vote:
The vote β the free citizenβs moment of glory
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/vote2012.htm
The vote β A blank check for state power
www.ruthlesscriticism.com/blankcheck.htm
And maybe then the thought that there is no perfect leader becomes a critique of rulership, as opposed to an endorsement of someone who has a program for the state and an image of its necessities, which is indeed different from Trump's program for the US state...
14.11.2023 17:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0(this becomes absolute in war when subjects are killed for the aims of the state) and because b) modern states institute a system of competition and opposing interests.
14.11.2023 17:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Well you say there are no perfect leaders but why is that? Well maybe it's because a) governance is by necessity in direct opposition to the subjects of the government, seeing as you only need force to make people do things they do not wish to do
14.11.2023 17:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Na wenn du was inhaltliches gegen die haben willst dann schon
10.11.2023 08:42 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Na was soll das Bild dann?
09.11.2023 09:51 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Heute!
Wer nicht in der Stadt ist kann sich auch dazu schalten
DafΓΌr entweder drΓΌben ne DM an kk-gruppe oder notfalls ne Mail an info@kk-gruppe.net schreiben