Humbled to bea part of this paper on principles for developing evidence briefs for landscape fire management. besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
16.02.2026 08:23 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0Humbled to bea part of this paper on principles for developing evidence briefs for landscape fire management. besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
16.02.2026 08:23 — 👍 5 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0
On this day that supports inclusive futures for women and girls in science, let's not forget all the women that were sidelined, ignored, or forced out of science because they:
- had children
- prioritised family/caring
- did science differently
- questioned boundaries & norms
- fought the patriarchy
'Minding the forest gaps: uptake and use of single rope bridges over forest roads by arboreal fauna'
Interesting to see this work on the use of rope bridges as a tool in production forests (rather than across large and major roads).
www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Was glad to speak with The Guardian about the impacts of frequent fires on ecosystems, and bang my usual drum about the need for a state level strategy on how we manage the inevitable change that is going to occur to many forest ecosystems. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
30.01.2026 03:58 — 👍 15 🔁 6 💬 0 📌 0
“The debate doesn’t need to be ‘do we burn or not burn’. That is an old, simplistic debate. What we need to understand is how much we burn, where we burn and for what reason.”
www.theage.com.au/politics/vic...
"The concept of lighting a fire to maintain the health of a forest didn't enter into the legislation."
www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01...
How many hollow bearing trees are in the forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria? Turns out about 1.5 million, with no difference between state forests and parks. This new paper is an amazing whole of landscape inventory of this crucial habitat resource. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
28.12.2025 21:59 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Looks like you were right, @ianpennaoz.bsky.social!
04.12.2025 22:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Buried in yesterday's major announcements is that the State's land use assessment council, VEAC, is being wound up. The end of a long journey that began with the outstanding Land Conservation Council. www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victori...
04.12.2025 22:11 — 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0great editorial on risk aversion in forest management particularly on proactive fire management vs reactive fire suppression. Equally relevant to southern Australia. esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
23.11.2025 21:19 — 👍 15 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0Back in 2020 it was estimated by the Parliament Budget Office that an immediate shutdown of the same industry would cost $15 million in the first three years before savings would appear over a decade. Seems to have been an underestimate. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
04.11.2025 21:23 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Interesting to see this report reporting that closing the native timber industry in Victoria has cost $1.5 billion (so far). It's good to contrast this to earlier estimates (and it's a gold thing I have a long memory!)
www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victori...
Nice to see this expert elicitation on strategic fuel breaks being published. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
02.11.2025 21:37 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0How I feel about people thinking they are geniuses for putting the word "Great" in front of a generic descriptor of what's in that National Park
20.10.2025 12:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Finally someone is looking into the obsession with the word "Great" when it comes to natural assets. Same story for national parks - does my head in that we have a Great Otway, Great Koala, and Great Forest National Park (well that last one doesn't actually exist) www.theguardian.com/travel/2025/...
20.10.2025 11:57 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Kirsha Kaechele spoke at the Forestry Australia conference last year and it was a real treat. She brings an insightful outsiders perspective to the otherwise mind numbing forest war debates. www.themercury.com.au/news/opinion...
29.09.2025 02:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ah the grapevine, I'm not a subscriber. Tbh I've seen a lot of wild things said that appear to arise from it, but I may be proven wrong!
26.09.2025 00:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My point being, it feels like veacs/LCC role for many decades has been about allocating lands respectively between logging and parks. It's served other purposes but that was a major feature of Grampians, alpine, east Gippsland, box Ironbark, Otways, river red gum assessment etc.
24.09.2025 23:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Do you have a copy of the Silver report? I'd love to see it. I may be wrong but i didnt think VEAC influenced funding for PV? Beyond that - don't know what will happen. Though, with the end of logging, a lot of the rationale and distinction of national parks and state forests changes, in my opinion.
24.09.2025 23:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A review in 2021 showed that more tree fern tags from from the Otways in Vic than all of Tasmania. And Victoria collects no fee for tag which means there is no monitoring. Always baffled me where all these ferns come from - plantations as they are harvested? Private land? It's just so much.
21.09.2025 01:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good to see coverage of tree fern sales. I tend to agree with Prof Baker in this - Tasmania's tree fern sale system seems pretty good, particularly in how it raises fees for tags which then goes to fund monitoring and research. Victoria is another story, though. www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09...
21.09.2025 01:11 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Great to see the range of perspectives on how we manage ash forests for resilience in the future. Though I don't reckon opinions are divided in that we need new thinking and approaches. www.sbs.com.au/news/podcast...
21.09.2025 00:34 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0True but it's a bigger systemic problem I think. I once got told by a prominent green politician they couldn't publicly ask for more funding for Parks as it would undermine their case for more National Parks. You can imagine how depressed and disillusioned that made me feel!
14.09.2025 22:24 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0As a former parks staff once said to me - Parks don't acquire new parks, they get saddled with them. It's an odd model when you think about it - more and more expected from an agency that has less and less.
14.09.2025 09:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Near my hometown in the Dandenong Ranges NP, I think it took about eight years for a walking bridge to be fixed after some storms. And that was in a high tourism, high visitation park. So maybe 16 years for you?
14.09.2025 09:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
"Mr Dimopoulos said Parks Victoria had the funding required to maintain the new national parks.
"Parks Victoria are well funded and have all the resources they need," he said."
The same old story: more National Parks, and no new funding to actually manage them.
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09...
"maintaining existing parks" doesn't sound very proactive. Unfortunately I think the focus for many years has been the political sugar hit that comes with announcing new parks, rather than the slightly duller but very important work in funding them and proactively managing existing parks.
11.09.2025 02:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The Victorian Government is establishing a suite of long promised national parks but quite interesting to see the last paragraph sends a pretty clear message about the prospect for any future parks. www.premier.vic.gov.au/best-bush-op...
10.09.2025 23:29 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1An internal grant from my university to support parents continuing their research while on a career gap. And yes, seeing what one comes up with is the point of research. Go well Ben!
03.09.2025 21:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0