Is this the first time since Louise Bennett started publishing that she isn’t on this list?!
Getting ready for a weekend of philosophy at the Cathedral of Learning in Pittsburgh @center4philsci.bsky.social
Thank you for the boost, Michela!
📣 CFP for a topical collection containing selected papers from the *EPSA25* conference:
philsci.eu/page-1075762 #philsci
There are 10 days left to submit a proposal for the 6th Biennial EENPS Conference (Bucharest, 18–19 September 2026).
Submission deadline: 15 February!
Talks and symposia across all areas of philosophy of science are welcome ☀️
eenps2026.sciencesconf.org
#philsci
There’s a philosophical joke about (sickly) constitution here somewhere…
There’s a philosophical joke about (sickly) constitution here somewhere…
What’s your email? I can send it over!
This is happening in two weeks and I can hardly contain my excitement! 💙📚
✨Reminder✨ The symposia deadline for PSA 2026 is 15 January (this Thursday!)
We're hiring! We're looking for a relief bookseller to join us for a minimum of 3 hours per week, fixed term Feb-Jul 2026. For more information on the role and on how to apply, visit this blog post here! Closing at 10am Monday 26th January lighthousebookshop.com/posts/were-h...
Registration is open for this event 16-17 March @royalsociety.org with programme (titles and abstracts) available online: royalsociety.org/science-even.... In person and online.
Oh Gayle 🥹 all the very best!
Happy new year! If you are early career or graduate in Phil of Bio, consider European summer school below: fantastic venue, brilliant mix of junior & senior scholars, a wealth of debates, PPTs & skills training organised by @thomasreydon.bsky.social and myself. Deadline EXTENDED to 31 Jan! #philsci
Starting off the year with a visit to the @nationalgalleries.bsky.social in Edinburgh to see the Turner watercolours only on view in January #JMWTurner
Starting off the year with a visit to the @nationalgalleries.bsky.social in Edinburgh to see the Turner watercolours only on view in January #JMWTurner
Concluding my Greek “research trip” (aka testing the local Xmas cuisine) at the Athenian Lyceum of Aristotle—“epitome of human wisdom”—birthplace of virtue ethics #philsky
Here’s to 2026
The call for abstracts for the 2026 Joint Session is now live! Please consider submitting to the Society for Women in Philosophy #SWIP session if your work furthers the aims of SWIP, broadly construed 1/2
sites.google.com/view/2026-jo...
#CfA #philsky #feminism #SWIP @aristotsoc.bsky.social
Hallelujah!
2/2 i.e. if your work is on "feminism and related emancipatory philosophies, women in the history of philosophy, and achieving gender justice and related forms of justice in the profession".
For more info on SWIP's aims, check here and/or get in touch:
www.swipuk.org/who-we-are.h...
The call for abstracts for the 2026 Joint Session is now live! Please consider submitting to the Society for Women in Philosophy #SWIP session if your work furthers the aims of SWIP, broadly construed 1/2
sites.google.com/view/2026-jo...
#CfA #philsky #feminism #SWIP @aristotsoc.bsky.social
@vmywang.bsky.social reviews Robert Northcott’s Science for a Fragile World, a book that asks how scientific practice should shift when the systems we study—and rely on—are under strain. Her piece appears in our November issue: buff.ly/hUCMcjS #PhilSky #PhilosophyOfScience
Fifty years to the day since the death of Hannah Arendt. This is (still) such a fantastic interview:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVSR...
🎥 Watch the Lakatos Award Lecture 2025 by Mazviita Chirimuuta on "Apocalyptic Technology: #AI and the Limits of #Science"
Mazviita Chirimuuta received the award for her book “The Brain Abstracted: Simplification in the History and Philosophy of Neuroscience”
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KkX...
Following some rewarding reading group meetings with @michelamassimi.bsky.social and others in the department, a review of Robert Northcott's new book 'Science for a Fragile World' has now come out in @philosophyinreview.bsky.social #philsci #philsky #science
journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pi...
3/3 "level" of scientific inquiry does this choice take place? Is every experiment, every semi-structured interview a choice between these two approaches? Or does the choice happen at the level of whole research grants and programmes?
2/3 case-worker is still the best way to find stability before switching to a stability-theorist approach. Not sure about the smoothness of this transition... this brings up a general worry one might have: how dichotomous is the choice between case-worker and stability-theorist really? And at what
1/3 Good question. Northcott is mainly worried about the opposite problem: science loses something (esp. wasted resources) when scientists insist on stability-theorist when, in fact, lots of relations are fragile. According to Northcott, the idea is that in cases of mere epistemic unpredictability
tl;dr I think Northcott makes a compelling case that scientists should more often proceed on the assumption that the causal/explanatory relations they're studying are "fragile" (i.e. unpredictable), and that this necessitates a "case-worker" approach to inquiry.