1920: Peak Horse
you may have seen my Nitrogen Motet.
more fundamental: "Turn off the faucet before you mop."
yes
Sports
Cats
Pets
Besides the 'design', They'll have a tough time writing patents that aren't obvious citable public knowledge or prior art.
WHAT?!
Anyone thinking ChatGPT is HIPAA compliant? Maybe they don't know that OpenAI is founded on theft. Or that their own doctors' Patient Portals are run by 3rd-parties whose HIPAA compliance isn't enforced.
His lips are moving
It's easy to buy off the 3-member PRC. And cheap!
Blackstone's business model:
"Eviscerate every company we buy."
I hope you're joking
Current 'AI' boosters are not dramatically failing.
Their con is working...most effective ever, on a per-cap basis.
No.
That's like 'everybody should recycle.'
Zero responsibility for vendors...you know, the ones who profit from their products.
No.
That's like 'everybody should recycle.'
Zero responsibility for vendors...you know, the ones who profit from their products.
Meta finally perfected their product development process.
Instead of yet another prototype <thing> that's only viable in Zuck's data-gathering fantasies, they add a cool name.
Quit using 'AI' when you mean software.
LLMs aren't AI.
Or are you shilling?
Surrounded by treesful of cicadas, 24/7!
When it does, sama will keep hitting the piñata till the last penny falls.
Core requirement!
Continuous-gathering *personal* data _can_ be fine, but only when that data is only stored in one place: on-device, AND is encrypted.
+
The patterns-recognized about the user, eventually providing useful predictive awareness, must also be device-only + encrypted.
Sorta user-centered
The Barbie nose is a tell of the original character designer's age
The modern Disney ski-jump noses are ok. . .until you notice them
replace 'maliciousness' with 'avariciousness'
the avg of every Lara Croft videogame clip ever scraped
the telephone doesn't fabricate
Lobbyist $
waste of time typing msg to Ad Age.
"Our vertical lies, period."
<real thought: stride length>
hmmm. . . can't quite recall the game designer she resembles.
It's a design decision. The technical term is 'con.'
. . . and they spelled idiocy wrong.