I assume this is on your email signature at this point (I did play it because of you so)
03.03.2026 22:51 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1@cjterry.bsky.social
Former political researcher and professional elections nerd specialising in electoral and party systems. Current day market research analyst for museums, heritage, the arts and charities around the world. UK's number one Romania-phile. Still a nerd. He/him
I assume this is on your email signature at this point (I did play it because of you so)
03.03.2026 22:51 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1Look, the autism and ADHD come out in many ways
03.03.2026 22:45 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I've often felt you could make an excellent Game of Thrones style series modelled on medieval Romania.
03.03.2026 22:40 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0So basically the Ottomans would invade Europe through Moldova and Wallachia and then they'd hit the Carparthian mountains and that's where the War for Christendom was fought.
03.03.2026 22:40 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The bit in the North West is Transylvania which was under Hungarian/Austrian/Austro-Hungarian rule and the bits in the East and South are Moldova/Moldavia (after which the Republic is named as it's historically part of it) and Wallachia, which were Ottoman vassals.
03.03.2026 22:40 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yeah. It was also historically very empty of people even by medieval standards. Basically to do with geography, as many things are. The Carpathian mountains slice right through the middle of the country, and then on the other side of that you've got a huge plain.
03.03.2026 22:36 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's funny as well because I am old enough to remember when one of the homophobic stereotypes was that gay men secretly all wished they were women. Make up your minds lads.
03.03.2026 22:31 — 👍 31 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Yeah, so they had an aristocracy, the boyars, but the cities were dominated by other ethnicities and Romania was very rural historically.
03.03.2026 22:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is, in part because so little is known about it. I highly recommend Neagu Djuvara's Brief Illustrated History of Romanians.
03.03.2026 22:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0VOLITION - No. Not a disaster. Weave this into the story of you. Walk out of its *ruins*. Save those who still can be saved -- *I'm* on your side.
03.03.2026 22:13 — 👍 64 🔁 22 💬 0 📌 2All it took was for the entire pre existing political establishment, including the previous pro Western parties, to be involved in the mass embezzlement of 12% of GDP.
03.03.2026 22:07 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I mean tbf, pro Eastern parties have typically done better in Moldova over the years than pro Western ones. Not true now, but this is basically the most successful the pro Westerners have been.
03.03.2026 22:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0During the Soviet era the Cyrillic alphabet was enforced to try and reduce Romanian nationalism. There were also attempts to Russify the language a bit, not very successful ones.
03.03.2026 22:03 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I can't remember if they changed the constitution or if the courts ruled or both, but it's officially Romanian again at the moment. I'm sure if the pro Eastern lot get in again it'll change again
03.03.2026 22:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I frankly have a suspicion that people may have misread the kind of tricky to parse question
03.03.2026 21:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Republic of Moldova has a fun thing where depending on whether you are pro Western or pro Eastern you also typically disagree on whether the language you are speaking is called Romanian or Moldovan (there are no significant differences)
03.03.2026 21:59 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0But I'd guess it was because in part because in the pre nationalist era the litigurgical language of the Romanian Orthodox Church was Old Church Slavonic and monks were the main group who could read or write.
03.03.2026 21:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Tbf we don't completely know, a lot of the history of the Romanian language is very unknown. It doesn't turn up in records until, I want to say, the fifteenth century.
03.03.2026 21:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0An important thing here is that Romanians were mostly a peasant people for most of their history so there was very little thought about things like their language until the emergence of liberal nationalism.
03.03.2026 21:50 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Because they speak a romance language. One of the closest to Latin, in fact. (Romanians will tell you it's the closest to Latin, but I think linguists mostly say Sardinian is)
03.03.2026 21:47 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Nationalism. Romanian is the great heir to Latin, prieten, so obviously it should use the correct alphabet
03.03.2026 21:43 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Same is true of Romanian in the 18th century and Romanian in the 19th century
03.03.2026 21:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0One of my continual takes is that being in opposition together against a government you both hate for a long time breeds warm feelings amongst parties
03.03.2026 21:39 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0It helps tbf that you do see these accents on TV sometimes, or at least representations of lighter accents from those regions. Most Americans, I dare say, have only heard South East English or some of the lighter Northern accents
03.03.2026 21:36 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah it's considered the closest language to English.
03.03.2026 21:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I mean I literally said they'd have to come from the Lib Dems because that's the only potential source of voters that would be substantial enough to make the numbers work. And like, no, they have not gained that number of Lib Dem voters in Lib Dem seats.
03.03.2026 21:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0At least amongst Indo European languages I think yes. Partly because of us being an Island, I'm sure
03.03.2026 21:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0sir this is a Tim Hortons
03.03.2026 21:18 — 👍 244 🔁 30 💬 12 📌 0The funny thing about former Yugoslavia is the difference between Croatian and Serbian is supposedly similar in level to the difference between American and British English but they can still turn it into a whole thing
03.03.2026 21:16 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 4 📌 0Excellent choices for book writing venues all round.
03.03.2026 21:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0