RubberCF's Avatar

RubberCF

@rubbercf.bsky.social

University student, studying psychology and philosophy, dirty apostate

31 Followers  |  35 Following  |  107 Posts  |  Joined: 03.01.2024  |  2.0385

Latest posts by rubbercf.bsky.social on Bluesky

Its so interesting how the left seems to suffer more from infighting when its the far right that has views 90% of people would consider fundamentally morally bankrupt. Youd think moderate right wingers would have more issues with the far right than moderate left wingers have with the far left

04.11.2025 07:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is this like a paid only video i dont see it

18.09.2025 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Do not what lol

12.09.2025 13:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah not only does it strafe quickly, theres no reason to not jump around to your hearts content.

08.09.2025 02:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Actually we can do something about community backlash because we are each part of the community. Repeatedly criticizing the resonse for creating mistrust only emphasizes reasons to mistrust SSC, when we could be explaining why they can and should still be trusted.

06.09.2025 01:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There will always be valid criticism to be made about details, but as a whole i think the response was justified given the circumstances, and an effective demonstration that we can trust SSC to do their due diligence in cases and respond to good faith critiques.

29.08.2025 02:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think theres definitely room to disagree with or defend what *exactly* SSC did decide to share, but either way its clear that they were very thoughtful and intentional about it. My issue is with people treating the whole response as unjustified just because some of the details were private

29.08.2025 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Especially when that disinformation has prevented them from doing their job effectively, keeping the community safe.

Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video

29.08.2025 01:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Few were concerned about privacy when Six shared intimate messages, or how they might affect legal proceedings, so clearly its *sometimes* excusable despite those concerns. Yet SSC is expected to take the video down over privacy and legal concerns even to combat disinformation?

29.08.2025 01:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Under normal circumstances, it would be wrong for SSC to reveal what they did. But when one party takes advantage of confidentiality to freely spread their own narrative about the case, theres a point where confidentiality/privacy is secondary to truth

29.08.2025 01:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

All well said. I'll admit, I think the whole "this never should have been made public" sentiment is kind of over-applied. Yes, it should not have been made public. But it WAS made public, and because it was, each relevant party has a right to set the record straight when another misrepresents it

29.08.2025 01:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

SSC cant keep the community safe if misinformation about then abounds freely. Theres a point where they have a right to respond

27.08.2025 19:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They have to be able to respond when misinformation about a case is spread to hurt their image, which makes their work to keep the community safe much harder

27.08.2025 19:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When this happened, there was so much panic behind the scenes that never saw the public eye. Many TOs no longer felt safe running their events, knowing that there was intentional harm done to try and attack the SSC, that does all of its volunteer work to help in keeping the scene safer, and TOs.

23.08.2025 02:06 β€” πŸ‘ 163    πŸ” 42    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 5

When you, as a victim SSC was attempting to help, perpetuated lies and vitriol so only YOU could speak on the matter β€” under the threat of legal enforcements and public backlash β€” they have every right to disprove their claims (like how YOU did the same).

You are the exception, not the good kind.

25.08.2025 20:08 β€” πŸ‘ 67    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

DUDE said it best

24.08.2025 20:32 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Its explained in the video, thats how they know

24.08.2025 05:47 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Im not sure what eitherbof those have to do with what i said, also how did they doxx Six and iMad?

24.08.2025 04:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Because it concerns community safety? Also a ruling for madness was already made months ago, even if it was quite short.

23.08.2025 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Tbf as the video explains, the legal case has already been finished, the current lawsuit isnt about whether or not Gem is guilty

23.08.2025 17:40 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Riot Is The Language Of The Unheard
YouTube video by Lone Star Left Riot Is The Language Of The Unheard

youtu.be/QOeHEc_VhzE?...

02.08.2025 21:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Isaiah Martin removed from Texas House Committee on Redistricting
YouTube video by Lone Star Left Isaiah Martin removed from Texas House Committee on Redistricting

Texas politics can be a shithole but a lot of the democrats are really inspiring

25.07.2025 21:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I completed side order using nothing but drone sprinkler to paint and deal damage. The second boss fight took 22 minutes

23.07.2025 21:55 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No ones obligated to befriend family dispite them being right wing, but its not a good way to get people to not he right wing. It just pushes them away from some of the only reasonable voices in their lives

14.07.2025 07:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

immigration is good actually.

11.07.2025 12:35 β€” πŸ‘ 648    πŸ” 59    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 4

No ink resist is surprising to me. Wouldnt dread want that?

28.06.2025 10:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone should know that the SC just voted against nationwide injunctions. This means that unconstitutional executive orders can go through and apply to everyone until the SC rules it unconstitutional. No more judges blocking Trump immediately nationwide
Authoritarianism

27.06.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

there is a very disturbing subreddit called r/BeyondThePromptAI i think were cooked, LLMs are going to turn into a religion or something

24.06.2025 05:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

A friend of mine is doing art commissions to help pay for medical debt, it would mean a lot to me if anyone bought one. You can message them on discord @thew.rst

16.06.2025 22:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think so many people hate Greta Thunburg bc her advocacy makes them feel insecure about their lack of effort

15.06.2025 19:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@rubbercf is following 20 prominent accounts