RubberCF

Donate to Support for River's Memorial Fund, organized by Allyssa Carney hi, As many have seen, our family has suffered a tragic loss. Our young, 18 year … Allyssa Carney needs your support for Support for River's Memorial Fund

A good friend of mine lost one of their friends unexpectedly, this is to fund their funeral. They're almost at their goal, donations are greatly appreciated. gofund.me/00ef1f353

you can do this with discord clients, like vencord

Bans were used liberally at the time due to the large amount of trolls.
I can't speak to what Lila shared on their twitter account, but I see no reason to believe they bragged about things they never did.
Please do not spread false narratives, the community has dealt with them too much already.

Hello, Squid School mod here. This is not accurate. Lila was banned around that time for mildly inappropriate messages referencing the allegations, but they did not harass, kink shame, or share Gem's sexual preferences. He was also never warned or timed out.

Actually a very scary post given thats twice as many immigrants as there are in the US. What are they thinking will fill the other 50 million

Your issue is with formatting? What? How is that at all important. Also the screenshot contains her full message

What? They are totally different kinds of cases relatuve to the situation. The charges she failed to bring were the accusations themselves, his own case is just defamation and this document is not about proving defamation, its about clearing his name of those accusations.

What are you talking about? What parts are "downright incorrect"? And obviously Gem cleared this with his lawyers.
this isnt "prolonging a messy breakup" its clearing his name to potentially thousands of people who think he committed SA. How is any of this muddying the waters?

It shouldve stayed private back in February of 2024. But once one side starts spinning a narrative publicly, the other has every right to respond publicly to clear their name. What does the defamation case have to do with when this statement should release?

I know you didn't literally make that statement, I'm just implying that that is effectively what you're saying. If you didn't mean to say that, than I apologize for misinterpreting but it really does seem like you did

"its not her fault for lying, its their fault for believing lies"
i agree that a lot of people are at fault for engaging the way they did, but again that does not reduce her fault in the matter and it shouldn't be framed like that.

I respect the calls for more nuance in the future, but if Six had not lied and misled so much, most if not all damage would have been avoided. It is the fault of many individuals for believing a lot of poorly substantiated lies, but that doesn't take responsibility away from her.

are you taking issue with the video they made about it? i think they had every right to do that given six was taking advantage of their confidentiality up until then to spin a defamatory narrative about them

they mentioned in the video they made on this case that they have made a temp ban system so they can move quicker in response to serious accusations and that they have changed their rules after some particularly controversial case results. what is preventing you from supporting them?

frankly the SSC video should have been enough on its own to demonstrate this, but damn this doc is pretty thorough and just confirms it further.

Gem's Response to the Allegations READ THIS, IF NOTHING ELSE This document is going to be long, and I understand that might make it less palatable to read. Just, if your response to this document is going to be "I'm not reading all th...

Please judge this statement by my own words, not what someone else said about it on Twitter. My accusers have spent a long time spreading their narrative and may bomb this with comments to poison the well, while this is my 1st chance to publicly explain what's... docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Had my first coffee after leaving the church 2 years ago
It was good

can confirm that mini splatling with wail would be sick as hell

actually its UGLY

my mom often cites a lack of "thankfulness" when justifying things like cutting USAID or grant funding for universities

the starving infants and scientists who develop lifesaving medical treatments arent thankful enough

It would be monumentally disappointing if this was why Talarico loses. I'll admit though it would be funny to see republican attack ads like "are you sure you want a senator who looks at porn???"

Its so interesting how the left seems to suffer more from infighting when its the far right that has views 90% of people would consider fundamentally morally bankrupt. Youd think moderate right wingers would have more issues with the far right than moderate left wingers have with the far left

Do not what lol

Yeah not only does it strafe quickly, theres no reason to not jump around to your hearts content.

Actually we can do something about community backlash because we are each part of the community. Repeatedly criticizing the resonse for creating mistrust only emphasizes reasons to mistrust SSC, when we could be explaining why they can and should still be trusted.

There will always be valid criticism to be made about details, but as a whole i think the response was justified given the circumstances, and an effective demonstration that we can trust SSC to do their due diligence in cases and respond to good faith critiques.

I think theres definitely room to disagree with or defend what *exactly* SSC did decide to share, but either way its clear that they were very thoughtful and intentional about it. My issue is with people treating the whole response as unjustified just because some of the details were private

Especially when that disinformation has prevented them from doing their job effectively, keeping the community safe.

Anyways those are just my thoughts. Not a criticism of the video

Few were concerned about privacy when Six shared intimate messages, or how they might affect legal proceedings, so clearly its *sometimes* excusable despite those concerns. Yet SSC is expected to take the video down over privacy and legal concerns even to combat disinformation?

Under normal circumstances, it would be wrong for SSC to reveal what they did. But when one party takes advantage of confidentiality to freely spread their own narrative about the case, theres a point where confidentiality/privacy is secondary to truth