I just tried out Q.E.D. @qedscience.bsky.social on our recent preprint. I'm impressed. It's a little bit pedantic, but overall it identified the keys advances and limitations of the work and pointed me to some missed citations. I'm impressed!

a man with a beard is smiling and saying `` i appreciate you '' in a black and white photo . ALT: a man with a beard is smiling and saying `` i appreciate you '' in a black and white photo .

Just had a very nice online meet up with a bunch of hardcore users of @qedscience.bsky.social. It's amazing to have this support from the scientific community, to hear your ideas for new features & directions, and to learn how to improve based on your feedback - thank you! 🤟🍻

Yes!

I just tested q.e.d for a grant proposal and am blown away.

The suggested changes are on the point and will surely help my proposal.

This is amazing! @odedrechavi.bsky.social

Can't wait to submit my next paper before preprint to q.e.d!
🧪

Hi there! Feel free to email us at info@qedscience.com with any question, we’ll take it from there

Thank you André!

Thank you!

Thanks for the shout out!

Für life sciences gibt es den Tool von @qedscience.bsky.social . Es funktioniert eigentlich super: man erhält ein strukturiertes und sehr relevantes Feedback. Ich verstehe also die ganze Aufregung nicht: KI-Tools werden immer besser und als Hilfsmittel für die Begutachtung bereits sehr hilfreich.

Why We Seek Validation The scientific method, humanity’s most successful approach to uncovering how the world works, doesn’t rely on “truth” as much as it relies on validity. In fact, “valid” often serves as a sharper, more...

Science doesn’t actually run on truth – it runs on validity.

In our latest blog post we explore why science advances not by proving absolute truths, but by continuously evaluating how valid a claim is within a given paradigm.

qedscience.com/blog/why-we-...

@odedrechavi.bsky.social

a man pointing to a sign that says believe ALT: a man pointing to a sign that says believe

2025 was a rough year for science worldwide (and in general), but, despite everything, I am optimistic. Why? Because of
@qedscience.bsky.social! This crazy endeavour actually has a chance of changing how academia works.. 👇

And here's the report @qedscience.bsky.social generated for our new paper, summarizing what's new and what was already known before. I'm planning to submit q.e.d's reports as cover letters together with my pre-prints from now on (and so should you!)

Cold and lithium delay forgetting of olfactory memories in Caenorhabditis elegans Nature Neuroscience - In this study, we identify an actively regulated process that governs the rate of forgetting in Caenorhabditis elegans, modulated by both temperature and the mood-stabilizing...

Our🥶COOLNESS paper to date is finally published! Ice cold and lithium dramatically delay forgetting (extend memory) in C. elegans. Why? read all about it! 👇
rdcu.be/eVhn2

An article about @qedscience.bsky.social this time in @lemonde.fr 🍷 Would you prefer to get feedback on your paper in French? Lots of scientists in France are q.e.ding❤️https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/12/10/l-evaluation-des-articles-scientifiques-bouleversee-par-l-ia_6656706_1650684.html

L’IA bouleverse l’évaluation des articles scientifiques Des éditeurs de revues scientifiques testent des plateformes d’intelligence artificielle pour analyser leurs avantages et inconvénients lors de l’examen d’un article soumis à un journal.

Thank you @lemonde.fr! If you’re a French scientist, you should try qed. Also if you’re not.

www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...

“qed analyzes manuscripts with remarkable precision, depth and logic”. A great write-up on @qedscience.bsky.social
by Jörg Klug in @laborjournal.bsky.social.

Enthusiastic user feedback + thoughtful critique = the conversation science needs around AI and review.

laborjournal.de/rubric/hinte...

I liked this thoughtful article about q.e.d‘s AI Review and our collaboration with @openrxiv.bsky.social (biorxiv) in @nature.com. Yes, AI is here to stay and we need to get ready. One important note that was missing in this piece: we intentionally made qed an authors-centric tool (see more below) 👇

Interesting fact: even though our core focus is currently biological research papers, ~15% of total uploads are of clinical papers, and many upload grants… even though we haven’t officially dealt with those (yet 😉).

Which areas do you think we should go into next?

Recently tried it on our published paper (neuroscience, biological psychiatry field, so out of the main @qedscience.bsky.social domain). But still, very impressed with the identified gaps and identified novelty in the field! Can we re-use/paraphrase some of the novelty findings? Highly recommend!

Let us know!

Why it's encouraged to run your paper in @qedscience.bsky.social as soon as possible

Hi Zia, did you manage to sign up? Feel free to DM / email us at info@qedscience.com and we'll gladly assist

Check it out!

q.e.d: An AI Tool for Smarter Manuscript Review A team of researchers developed q.e.d, an AI-powered system designed to deliver rigorous and constructive feedback on scientific manuscripts in minutes.

ai peer review: "The problem is that the fun ends when you need to publish it and go through the [review] process.”
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...

Limited Time AI offering! - Scientific editing and writing experts - Life Science Editors AI that thinks critically. Editors who know what matters.

Most setbacks (logic gaps, novelty confusion, unsupported conclusions) are preventable.
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/

Tried @qedscience.bsky.social by running our published paper through it. It identified 2 issues unknown to us. Amazing work, Dr. @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team. 👌👌👌

😅

The support from @embopress.org and @reviewcommons.org means a lot! Thank you @tlemberger.bsky.social ! @qedscience.bsky.social

Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.

openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...

#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv

Enabling options for review: from training and transparency to author-centered AI tools - openRxiv Peer review is widely viewed as a critical aspect of biomedical communication. Ideally, it provides authors with feedback so they can improve manuscripts and gives readers, particularly nonspecialists...

Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n

openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...