How Should We Power Datacenters?
There are multiple clean, renewable ways.
Letβs focus on what is useful and what works.
www.youtube.com/shorts/G0ARV...
@mzjacobson.bsky.social
Climate, pollution, clean/renewable energy Stanford U Prof, Civil & Env Eng; Director, Atmos/Energy Program Cofounder-Solutions Project; Appeared on Letterman Testified Held v Montana https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/ Stanford.io/Jacobson
How Should We Power Datacenters?
There are multiple clean, renewable ways.
Letβs focus on what is useful and what works.
www.youtube.com/shorts/G0ARV...
How Should We Power Datacenters?
There are multiple clean, renewable ways.
Letβs focus on what is useful and what works.
www.youtube.com/shorts/G0ARV...
Professor @mzjacobson.bsky.social of Stanford University explains how carbon capture and storage, the technology required to make any βdecarbonizedβ pipeline possible, is a greenwashing scam.
#cdnpoli #CCS #OOTT #decarbonization #greenwashing #scam
youtube.com/shorts/V_XuU...
How do we eliminate emissions from steel and cement?
Here's how
www.youtube.com/shorts/-EQdS...
More info
web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/j...
Blue H2 hardly exists. Almost all H2 today is from gray H2 or coal.
Green hydrogen is available today, and its production is growing. Sweden's new steel plants are using green H2.
In any case, blue is almost as bad as gray H2
web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/j...
How do we eliminate emissions from steel and cement?
Here's how
www.youtube.com/shorts/-EQdS...
More info
web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/j...
Despite electric heating in TX, TX burns 3.1x the fossil gas per capita as CA. In fact, all southern states burn far more gas/capita than CA
So they use far more electricity and gas per capita. Due to lack of conservation and efficiency measures.
www.eia.gov/state/seds/d...
That makes a difference primarily if the home is not insulated well, which is the problem. A very-well-insulated home won't use much energy even if it is big. The lack of efficiency standards in TX stands out here.
01.12.2025 17:17 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some claim the high electricity use in TX and other southern states is due to electrification of heating vs use of gas for heat in CA & blue states
But TX burns 3.1x the fossil gas per capita as CA. All southern states burn far more gas/capita than CA
www.eia.gov/state/seds/d...
Some claim the high electricity use in TX and other southern states is due to electrification of heating vs use of gas for heat in CA & blue states
But TX burns 3.1x the fossil gas per capita as CA. All southern states burn far more gas/capita than CA
www.eia.gov/state/seds/d...
Some claim the high electricity use in TX and other southern states is due to electrification of heating vs use of gas for heat in CA & blue states
But TX burns 3.1x the fossil gas per capita as CA. All southern states burn far more gas/capita than CA
www.eia.gov/state/seds/d...
This phenomenon, where red states use far more electricity per capita than blue states, has been know for 40 y, as shown by Evan Mills and Art Rosenfeld in 1987:
escholarship.org/content/qt59...
It is due to the lack of efficiency standards and conservation programs in red versus blue states
No. This phenomenon has been know for 40 years and was pointed out by Evan Mills and Art Rosenfeld in 1987:
escholarship.org/content/qt59...
It is due to the lack of efficiency standards and conservation programs in red states versus blue states.
No. This phenomenon has been know for 40 years and was pointed out by Evan Mills and Art Rosenfeld in 1987:
escholarship.org/content/qt59...
It is due to the lack of efficiency standards and conservation programs in red states versus blue states.
Not much. This phenomenon has been know for 40 years and was pointed out by Art Rosenfeld in 1987
escholarship.org/content/qt59...
It is due to the lack of efficiency standards or conservation programs in red states versus blue states.
Correction. Third sentence should read: The 12 states with the highest per-capita electricity use are all red states."
30.11.2025 19:59 β π 20 π 5 π¬ 0 π 1(3/3) The good news is that efficiency measures work to reduce grid electricity demand. Along with rooftop PV, that is another way to keep electricity use low despite the growth in data centers, EVs, heat pumps, etc.
30.11.2025 17:44 β π 16 π 3 π¬ 2 π 0(2/3) The ratio of per-capita electricity use of the bottom-12 red states to the top-9 blue states is 2.60:1. In other words, these 12 red states use 2.6x the electricity per person as the 9 blue states.
Similarly, the per-capita electricity use of Texas is 2.67x that of California.
Yes. Corrected in a reply.
30.11.2025 19:59 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Correction. Third sentence should read: The 12 states with the highest per-capita electricity use are all red states."
30.11.2025 19:59 β π 20 π 5 π¬ 0 π 1(3/3) The good news is that efficiency measures work to reduce grid electricity demand. Along with rooftop PV, that is another way to keep electricity use low despite the growth in data centers, EVs, heat pumps, etc.
30.11.2025 17:44 β π 16 π 3 π¬ 2 π 0(2/3) The ratio of per-capita electricity use of the bottom-12 red states to the top-9 blue states is 2.60:1. In other words, these 12 red states use 2.6x the electricity per person as the 9 blue states.
Similarly, the per-capita electricity use of Texas is 2.67x that of California.
(1/3) Red states appear to intentionally waste electricity by not making efforts to reduce electricity use through better insulation, appliance standards, etc.
The nine states with the lowest per-capita electricity use are all blue
The 12 states with the lowest per-capita electricity use are red
All-of-the-above IS a failure. Let's focus on what works.
linkedin.com/posts/energy...
CA and NV have DECREASED their year-on-year grid electricity demands by growing roof PV more than new grid demands (datacenters, EVs, heat pumps) have increased
CA has the 3rd-most data centers and by far the most EVs
Other states could take a lesson in how to avoid increases in grid demand
13 American states generated 49-120% of their electricity from wind, water or solar. Wind has become the dominant source of electricity in 8 states.
29.11.2025 16:55 β π 11 π 7 π¬ 0 π 1And before anyone says, "but CA has such high elec prices," the elec price increase in CA during this time was only 0.23 c/kWh vs a US avg inc of 0.75 c/kWh
TX increased 0.6 c/kWh
NV decreased 2 c/kWh
So, CA & NV decreased grid demand with roof PV & kept price increases lower than other states
CA and NV have DECREASED their year-on-year grid electricity demands by growing roof PV more than new grid demands (datacenters, EVs, heat pumps) have increased
CA has the 3rd-most data centers and by far the most EVs
Other states could take a lesson in how to avoid increases in grid demand
New EIA data
From Oct 1, '24-Sep 30, '25, 13 states generated 49.7-121% of their electricity demand with WWS
Wind was #1 overall generator 8 in states (SD, IA, WY, KS, ME, NM, ND, OK)
Hydro #1 in 3 (MT, WA, OR)
Solar #1 overall in CA and #1 WWS generator in NV
web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/j...
The evidence keeps piling up that β contrary to popular belief β more clean renewables means cheaper electricity
11 of 12 US states with the highest proportion of clean renewables have cheaper than average electricity