SIGB Literary's Avatar

SIGB Literary

@sigbliterary.bsky.social

SIGB Literary will be a small press, publishing polyamory content without the smut. Queer, kinky & neurodiverse positive fiction, poetry, essays & art all welcome. Created by @faerywhimsy.bsky.social No Gen AI. No Porn. No Erotica. AS YET UNLAUNCHED

18 Followers  |  125 Following  |  1 Posts  |  Joined: 10.09.2025  |  1.8986

Latest posts by sigbliterary.bsky.social on Bluesky

The biggest issue with polyamory is not just how people don't understand it and don't want to, but that in western culture we are very self-centric and so many don't understand the concept of love in a non-sexual way. Asexual polyamory can be really beautiful. Love doesn't have to be horny and weird

01.09.2025 21:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Text reads: SIGB Literary: Publishing Polyam.
Watch this space
against a cropped polyamorous flag.

Text reads: SIGB Literary: Publishing Polyam. Watch this space against a cropped polyamorous flag.

Interested seeing a bit more separation from the overt sexualisation in upcoming polyamorous creative arts & non-fiction?

So are we! Watch this space for upcoming news, events and hope for seeing this pipedream come to life, with polyamorous editor and novelist @faerywhimsy.bsky.social at the helm.

12.09.2025 02:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Cover art of Happiness in Numbers, edited by Nicole Field.

Cover art of Happiness in Numbers, edited by Nicole Field.

In February 2019, I was the proud editor of an anthology called Happiness in Numbers.

It was a trailblazer - not just because it was the first anthology to tell solely polyamorous stories, but because it was then, and is still today, the only polyamorous anthology without sex at its core.

10.09.2025 03:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Text reads: If people continue to see polyamorous people and characters as nothing more than the sex itโ€™s possible for them to have, theyโ€™ll never see anything else in the potential of polyamorous stories.

Text reads: If people continue to see polyamorous people and characters as nothing more than the sex itโ€™s possible for them to have, theyโ€™ll never see anything else in the potential of polyamorous stories.

As an asexual polyamorous person, I think about this all the time.

I'm even in the middle of an essay, analysing 27 polyamorous stories published between 2010-2024, that features the line:

10.09.2025 03:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
A list of genres polyamory might fit into: Disability & polyamory!
Polyamorous found family!
Polyamory in Space!
Polyamorous royal line of succession in fantasy!
Polyamorous final girls!!
Spaghetti Western Polyamory!
It takes a village polyamory!
Polyamorous red herrings!!

A list of genres polyamory might fit into: Disability & polyamory! Polyamorous found family! Polyamory in Space! Polyamorous royal line of succession in fantasy! Polyamorous final girls!! Spaghetti Western Polyamory! It takes a village polyamory! Polyamorous red herrings!!

It's 2025. Is it still too soon to see an independent publishing house opening its doors solely to polyamorous fiction?

I'm not fussy, Really, I'll take polyamory in literally every genre I can get it including, but of *course* not limited, to

10.09.2025 03:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

@sigbliterary is following 20 prominent accounts