Jens E. Pedersen's Avatar

Jens E. Pedersen

@jegp.bsky.social

Researching neuromorphic computing. Curious about abstractions. Cares about FOSS. Author of Neuromorphic Intermediate Representation in NatComm: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-52259-9

385 Followers  |  29 Following  |  20 Posts  |  Joined: 07.02.2024  |  2.0009

Latest posts by jegp.bsky.social on Bluesky

I'm proud to chair this initiative, bringing together leading scientists, students, and volunteers to build an open and sustainable ecosystem for neuromorphics.

Check it out and sign up. We can use your help :-)

06.11.2025 08:39 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

#neuromorphic #ComputerVision #EventBasedVision

05.09.2025 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My humble hope: this could be a turning point for SNNs to excel in what they were designed for: sparse, spatio-temporal signal processing.

The best part? Everything is open-source. Steal it, modify it, send it to hardware with the Neuromorphic Intermediate Representation - just please cite us :-)

05.09.2025 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Covariant spatio-temporal receptive fields for spiking neural networks - Nature Communications Neuromorphic computing mimics brain efficiency but lacks theoretical guidance. Here, authors develop a computational foundation for processing signals in space and time in spiking neural networks that...

New paper on covariant #neuromorphic networks!

We're connecting decades of work in computer vision with decades of work in spiking networks. And, in an event-based vision task against regular ANNs of similar complexity, spiking networks are doing much, much better!

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

05.09.2025 21:05 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can you unpack this a bit?
Some argue that large models work well in machine learning because of the mysterious fact that gradient descent improves at scale, despite non-convexity (arxiv.org/pdf/2105.04026).
Would you agree? If so, how does this apply to simulations?

20.12.2024 10:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah, yes, thank you. I initially read the quote to mean that physics restrict the algorithm, not that physics IS the algorithm.
For finding solutions, as you write, this distinction is important. Restrictions have to be baked in from the beginning, otherwise any β€œsolution” will be meaningless.

20.12.2024 10:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is actually interesting. Did she believe that the role of silicon in VLSI systems is similar to the role of neural substrates in nervous systems?

If so, I would agree with Brad that I don't see the big difference. But simulations will always be a poor man's approximation

18.12.2024 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Why stop there? If I had something to sell, I would want to hijack every neuromodulator I could get my hands on. Eternal chemical bliss πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

16.12.2024 14:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That's a great point! We cannot equate the hardware with the model. "NeuroAI" is indeed not a model.

I wonder whether the ambiguity would stand if we had a solid understanding of how the substrate related to the algorithm. Where does physics/hardware stop and where does computation begin?

16.12.2024 13:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh dear, that's terrible and borderline denigrative 😬

16.12.2024 13:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm wondering how to address this. Isn't part of the reason why some words remain less viscous that they have strong definitions? Could it be that part of the problem is that #NeuroAI is too vague? What if we need better definitions?
We could start with "intelligence"...

16.12.2024 13:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I agree that languages inevitably evolve, but at the same time words have to *mean* something.
Personally, I consider "neuromorphic" to apply to concepts outside hardware. I am open to changing my mind, but there have been so many conflicting takes on this that I am, frankly, confused.

16.12.2024 13:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Neuromorphic Programming: Emerging Directions for Brain-Inspired Hardware The value of brain-inspired neuromorphic computers critically depends on our ability to program them for relevant tasks. Currently, neuromorphic hardware often relies on machine learning methods adapt...

Curious about #neuromorphic computing? πŸ§ πŸ’»
We want to revolutionalize the way we program brain-inspired systems and are plotting a course in a new publication with Steven Abreu: ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/doc... (or open access arxiv.org/abs/2410.22352)
Let's build better neuromorphics together! πŸš€

08.12.2024 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It seems like a neat paper on DSP, but could you tell me how this relates to continous computation?

08.12.2024 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
GERD: Geometric event response data generation Event-based vision sensors are appealing because of their time resolution, higher dynamic range, and low-power consumption. They also provide data that is fundamentally different from conventional fra...

New preprint out on a data generator for geometric event responses. Here's to hoping this will make event-based models more aware of geometry and symmetry ✨

#neuromorphic #computervision #dataset

arxiv.org/abs/2412.03259

05.12.2024 09:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think that's exactly the right mindset. It'll be hard to balance concerns when the new wave of hardware hits, but sticking to the "fast weights" bit is crucial. Nice.
My hunch still is that this requires a continuous representation, but I may be wrong πŸ€” maybe we should do a survey?

24.11.2024 07:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

open-neuromorphic.org ☺️

24.11.2024 07:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm still not sold on the MLIR angle. It may help integration of existing models, but MLIR is inherently digital. Wouldn't that hinder the computational expressivity of mixed-signal hardware?

23.11.2024 18:39 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Just listened to the Lex Fridman podcast with Yann Lecun, emphasizing the importance of open #AI. Couldn't agree more!
As an open source maintainer for #neuromorphic tech, thank you for the praise and encouragement. I needed that today ❀️

open.spotify.com/episode/0bXy...

21.03.2024 09:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

#neuromorphic computing is promising to drive artificial intelligence much further---and this blogpost benchmarks SNN libraries, so you know where to start.
Join us on Discord discord.gg/C9bzWgNmqk

open-neuromorphic.org/blog/spiking...

21.02.2024 18:21 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@jegp is following 20 prominent accounts