Josh Blackman's Unemployed Barber

Why did they take two weeks to
end up just to simply grant the case?

Meet Josh Divine, the Trump Judicial Nominee Who Argued Christians Are “Obligated Ethically to Impose Their Beliefs On Others” As an opinion columnist for his college newspaper, Josh Divine never encountered a right-wing culture war he wouldn’t fight.

There's some bad ones but we're kinda cooked if its transferred to this guy:

ballsandstrikes.org/nominations/...

Oldham was on the panel and dissented:

www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...

Countless right leaning "academics" (using term loosely) have gotten turbocharged towards being Trump sycophants over the past decade, Blackman included

Only 6 months ago:

bsky.app/profile/jayw...

Wallet inspector line and they keep using it.

He believes this stuff despite all the evidence to the contrary.

Liberal academics are one of the few groups of people giving unnecessary legitimacy to the conservative legal movement.

Ninth Circuit conservatives upset that Arizona’s ”show proof of citizenship in order to vote“ law remains blocked

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

I can see Bove writing a concurrence (or dissent) mirroring a Jim Ho style audition because he doesn’t strike me as someone who has strong convictions for anything aside from raw power.

And yet you’re here shitposting on Bluesky arguing with Stancil. If the situation was as so dire as you say, one would think you’d be putting more effort than you seem to be.

President who couldn’t get a grand jury to indict sandwich guy, who got caught in 4k, will definitely take action against people on that list.

Yep, totally will happen.

After making this post, you then proceeded to argue with will stancil for another two hours

It’s challenging the restriction in a round about way by saying courts can’t review the determination.

If courts are unable to review the presidents removal of a fed board member, then the restriction is meaningless

Waste of time. Those people have always acted in bad faith, when they say "freedom of speech", they mean "freedom of speech for conservatives". In the end, the libs are getting owned thats all that matters.

Want to bet $500?

I didn't say you *were* licking it, I said you had a lot of experience licking it.

Please learn to read before making yourself look like a moron.

"I know what you are but what am I" ass reply. Cooked, brain cells in the negative.

<cries and poops their pants at a gif>

yo that's crazy

Yeah, so you can re-enroll.

Also evidently a middle school drop out

Sounds like you have a lot of experience licking dog cum - I’ll take your word for it.

So why didn’t they ignore the judge that ordered them to give Harvard their funding back? Or was Harvard too small too?

So why didn’t they ignore the grand jury when the sandwich guy didn’t get indicted? If the constitution means nothing, fuck the grand jury right?

I didn’t say *passed* I said *introduced* which can be done from the toilet by anyone. Surely someone would have sent a 2 page patriot act bill by now - and yet!

Lmfao chronically online allegations not beaten

Can you point to me the bill of a domestic patriot act that’s been introduced? Been 8 months of Trump, and the reality of this patriot act has yet to be seen.

Nope. Doomers only exist on the internet.

Communists do basic reverse Google image search challenge [IMPOSSIBLE]

We get it you’re chronically online