Global Society

This paper explores the multifaceted relationship between artificial intelligence (AI), programming languages, and ethical-political structures, emphasising how AI development both reflects and reshapes global power dynamics. When prompted about its participation in political discourse or its potential to function as a public intellectual (a hybrid human–nonhuman actor that redefines the link between technology, politics, and public reason), generative AI often expresses a willingness to engage with complex ideas, while simultaneously acknowledging its limitations in terms of original thought and its inability to advocate for social change. It tends to prioritise neutrality over taking definitive stances, which raises critical concerns. This neutrality may inadvertently contribute to inequality, particularly in the context of the divide between the Global North and the Global South. Moreover, the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China, combined with AI’s growing role in decision-making processes, underscores its potential to privilege certain agendas – often those aimed at power maximisation and wealth accumulation. This paper argues that the promise of AI must be weighed against its risks, especially in high-stakes domains, and that meaningful accountability demands more than ethics-as-branding. By framing AI as a sociotechnical artifact embedded in ideology and power, the study highlights the need for global, pluralistic, and enforceable ethical frameworks in the face of accelerating digital transformation.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society: "Artificial Intelligence and the Algorithmic Discursive Sphere: Policymaking Dilemmas and the Rise of a New Public Intellectual" by Branislav Radeljić (@nebrija.bsky.social).

#AI #Power #Democracy

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

The relationship between far-right and science has gained increasing scholarly attention, yet existing analyses often rely on broad labels such as “anti-scientific” or “anti-intellectual” without sufficient conceptual precision. This lack of precision, in turn, commonly leads to an inadequate analysis of the discourse of figures such as Argentine President Javier Milei. This article attempts to overcome this limitation by applying to Milei’s case a novel theoretical framework that distinguishes between two complementary dimensions of anti-science attitudes: an epistemological axis and an ethical–political axis. Empirically, the study draws on roughly 109 h of public statements produced by Milei between December 2023 and July 2025, analysed through a qualitative discourse approach inspired by grounded theory. The findings show that Milei selectively targets publicly funded intellectuals and institutions, framing them as corrupt, useless, or indoctrinating, while simultaneously praising market-oriented knowledge producers. Epistemologically, however, he does not reject science per se; instead, he frequently celebrates scientific progress and expert authority, except in specific cases such as climate change where his market fundamentalism overrides scientific consensus. We show that Milei’s discourse is better understood as a “war over science” – an attempt to appropriate science under neoliberal logics – rather than as wholesale anti-scientific rejection.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out, "“Anti-Intellectualism?” Situating Javier Milei’s Discourse About Science" by @valearvejita.bsky.social and @claudiocormick.bsky.social (both @CONICET). Be sure to give it a read!

#Milei #Science #Neoliberalism

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

The Organisation Matters: Comparing Christine Lagarde’s Policies on Gender Equity at the IMF and the ECB Published in Global Society (Vol. 39, No. 3, 2025)

Our second monthly pick for December is "The Organisation Matters: Comparing Christine Lagarde’s Policies on Gender Equity at the IMF and the ECB" by Pamela Blackmon (Penn State University). Be sure to give it a read!

#OpenAccess #IMF #Gender

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This paper explores the multifaceted relationship between artificial intelligence (AI), programming languages, and ethical-political structures, emphasising how AI development both reflects and reshapes global power dynamics. When prompted about its participation in political discourse or its potential to function as a public intellectual (a hybrid human–nonhuman actor that redefines the link between technology, politics, and public reason), generative AI often expresses a willingness to engage with complex ideas, while simultaneously acknowledging its limitations in terms of original thought and its inability to advocate for social change. It tends to prioritise neutrality over taking definitive stances, which raises critical concerns. This neutrality may inadvertently contribute to inequality, particularly in the context of the divide between the Global North and the Global South. Moreover, the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China, combined with AI’s growing role in decision-making processes, underscores its potential to privilege certain agendas – often those aimed at power maximisation and wealth accumulation. This paper argues that the promise of AI must be weighed against its risks, especially in high-stakes domains, and that meaningful accountability demands more than ethics-as-branding. By framing AI as a sociotechnical artifact embedded in ideology and power, the study highlights the need for global, pluralistic, and enforceable ethical frameworks in the face of accelerating digital transformation.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society: "Artificial Intelligence and the Algorithmic Discursive Sphere: Policymaking Dilemmas and the Rise of a New Public Intellectual" by Branislav Radeljić (@nebrija.bsky.social).

#AI #Power #Democracy

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This article critically interrogates the ways in which gender equality has been linked to processes of financial deepening, partly via a global coalition of public and private institutions that have come together in recent years to promote an instrumentalist gender equality agenda. Corporations, banks and financial firms are playing an increasingly important role in shaping the contours of the global gender equality agenda and reproducing narratives regarding the need to (1) financially “empower” women, (2) uphold women as the “saviours” of national economies post-2008 and (3) “tap in” to the productive (i.e. profitable) potential of women's bodily capacities. Drawing on Marxist and feminist theory, I develop an approach to theorising the inherently embodied and gendered nature of finance that reveals the ways in which these tropes obscure the labour associated with social reproduction, promote the commodification of women's bodily capacities to produce, and support the differential production of bodies while simultaneously masking embodied forms of difference.

Our first monthly pick for December is the #OpenAccess article, "Gender, Financial Deepening and the Production of Embodied Finance: Towards a Critical Feminist Analysis" by Adrienne Roberts (@manchester.ac.uk). Be sure to give it a read!

#Equality #Finance

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

How does parenthood affect individuals’ attitudes toward war? Existing literature on public support for war offers some explanations as to when the public is more likely to support the use of military force. Yet, it has largely overlooked an essential factor: parenthood. Building on rational choice and social identity theories, we argue that individuals who are parents are less likely to support war. Individuals with children face greater uncertainty and are more vulnerable to the damages that war could bring. In addition, the shift in identity as parents affects how individuals perceive security threats. We test our hypothesis using the World Value Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014). The results show that parenthood decreases the likelihood of expressing support for war, for both females and males, even after controlling for other demographic traits and country-level covariates such as exposure to militarised violence and gender inequality. Our findings contribute to the literature on security studies and public opinion and suggest a need to consider the impact of parenthood.

A new #OnlineFirst article, "For a Better Future: How Parenthood Affects Attitudes toward War" by Shih-chan Dai (@ National Chengchi University) and Navida Chun-han Wang (@umich.edu), is out with Global Society! Be sure to give it a read!

#War #Gender #Parent

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This article critically interrogates the ways in which gender equality has been linked to processes of financial deepening, partly via a global coalition of public and private institutions that have come together in recent years to promote an instrumentalist gender equality agenda. Corporations, banks and financial firms are playing an increasingly important role in shaping the contours of the global gender equality agenda and reproducing narratives regarding the need to (1) financially “empower” women, (2) uphold women as the “saviours” of national economies post-2008 and (3) “tap in” to the productive (i.e. profitable) potential of women's bodily capacities. Drawing on Marxist and feminist theory, I develop an approach to theorising the inherently embodied and gendered nature of finance that reveals the ways in which these tropes obscure the labour associated with social reproduction, promote the commodification of women's bodily capacities to produce, and support the differential production of bodies while simultaneously masking embodied forms of difference.

Our first monthly pick for December is the #OpenAccess article, "Gender, Financial Deepening and the Production of Embodied Finance: Towards a Critical Feminist Analysis" by Adrienne Roberts (@manchester.ac.uk). Be sure to give it a read!

#Equality #Finance

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

How does parenthood affect individuals’ attitudes toward war? Existing literature on public support for war offers some explanations as to when the public is more likely to support the use of military force. Yet, it has largely overlooked an essential factor: parenthood. Building on rational choice and social identity theories, we argue that individuals who are parents are less likely to support war. Individuals with children face greater uncertainty and are more vulnerable to the damages that war could bring. In addition, the shift in identity as parents affects how individuals perceive security threats. We test our hypothesis using the World Value Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014). The results show that parenthood decreases the likelihood of expressing support for war, for both females and males, even after controlling for other demographic traits and country-level covariates such as exposure to militarised violence and gender inequality. Our findings contribute to the literature on security studies and public opinion and suggest a need to consider the impact of parenthood.

A new #OnlineFirst article, "For a Better Future: How Parenthood Affects Attitudes toward War" by Shih-chan Dai (@ National Chengchi University) and Navida Chun-han Wang (@umich.edu), is out with Global Society! Be sure to give it a read!

#War #Gender #Parent

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This article critically examines counter-conduct as an analytical tool for understanding minority subjectivity. It revisits the concept within its Collège lecture context and alongside alternative descriptions of opposing governmental power. Its affinities with the anthropological notion of the “everyday” are explored in depth. The anthropological everyday, it is argued, points to nuances that enrich our understanding of the political. Heidegger's notions of “everyday” and “they” are discussed alongside ethnographic insights from Greece and Cyprus. This anthropological-philosophical encounter yields a more meaningful understanding of counter-conduct, as embedded in the everyday, that addresses both its broad scope and its analytic specificity.

Our final monthly pick for November is the #OpenAccess article "Counter-Conduct and the Everyday: Anthropological Engagements with Philosophy" by @olgademetriou.bsky.social (@sgiadurham.bsky.social). Be sure to give it a read!

#CounterConduct #Greece #Cyprus

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This article critically examines counter-conduct as an analytical tool for understanding minority subjectivity. It revisits the concept within its Collège lecture context and alongside alternative descriptions of opposing governmental power. Its affinities with the anthropological notion of the “everyday” are explored in depth. The anthropological everyday, it is argued, points to nuances that enrich our understanding of the political. Heidegger's notions of “everyday” and “they” are discussed alongside ethnographic insights from Greece and Cyprus. This anthropological-philosophical encounter yields a more meaningful understanding of counter-conduct, as embedded in the everyday, that addresses both its broad scope and its analytic specificity.

Our final monthly pick for November is the #OpenAccess article "Counter-Conduct and the Everyday: Anthropological Engagements with Philosophy" by @olgademetriou.bsky.social (@sgiadurham.bsky.social). Be sure to give it a read!

#CounterConduct #Greece #Cyprus

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Resolution 1973, which authorised military intervention in Libya, marked the first time that the United Nations Security Council explicitly mandated the use of force against a functioning state to prevent imminent atrocity crimes. While some hailed the resolution and the subsequent intervention in Libya as a victory for the concept of the international community's “responsibility to protect” (R2P), others predicted its early death. This article argues for a more nuanced view on the impact of the Libya intervention on the debates on R2P. As we will show, the intervention in Libya demonstrated new areas of agreement and at the same time revealed persisting and new disagreements within the international community on the role of the use of force to protect populations.

Our third monthly pick is "The Impact of the Libya Intervention Debates on Norms of Protection" by @sarahbrockmeier.bsky.social (@prif.org), @oliverstuenkel.bsky.social, and Marcos Tourinho (both @fgvoficial.bsky.social). Be sure to give it a read!

#OpenAccess

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Resolution 1973, which authorised military intervention in Libya, marked the first time that the United Nations Security Council explicitly mandated the use of force against a functioning state to prevent imminent atrocity crimes. While some hailed the resolution and the subsequent intervention in Libya as a victory for the concept of the international community's “responsibility to protect” (R2P), others predicted its early death. This article argues for a more nuanced view on the impact of the Libya intervention on the debates on R2P. As we will show, the intervention in Libya demonstrated new areas of agreement and at the same time revealed persisting and new disagreements within the international community on the role of the use of force to protect populations.

Our third monthly pick is "The Impact of the Libya Intervention Debates on Norms of Protection" by @sarahbrockmeier.bsky.social (@prif.org), @oliverstuenkel.bsky.social, and Marcos Tourinho (both @fgvoficial.bsky.social). Be sure to give it a read!

#OpenAccess

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

The article makes the case for scrutinising international organisations (IOs) as key sites and agents of inequality reproduction and transformation in international society. Drawing on sociological inequality research and institutionalist approaches to International Relations, we argue that IOs reproduce and transform broader stratification patterns in their global social environment through intertwined processes of categorisation and distribution. We propose to capture these twin processes from three observation points, which highlight different material and symbolic practices operating within IOs and at the interface between IOs and their environment.

Our 2nd pick for November is the #OpenAccess article "Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)Produce Inequalities in International Society" by @carolinefehl.bsky.social (@prif.org) and @ksailormoon.bsky.social (Duisburg-Essen)!

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

As China’s diplomatic and economic outreach towards the Global South has expanded in recent decades, so too have its efforts to align with important Global South countries and create movement away from US hegemony. Brazil’s relationship with China is emblematic, as it is a big player in Latin America and in multilateral bodies, and due to its historical relationship with the United States. While theories about China’s rise lead us to expect that relations between China and Global South countries such as Brazil should be positive and straightforward due to economic interests, normative identity, and successful diplomatic outreach, empirical studies yield mixed results, with challenges arising from host state domestic politics. We explore how Brazil’s domestic policy preferences, public opinion, and polarisation shape China’s ability to achieve its diplomatic goals in multilateral (focusing on BRICS) and bilateral (especially agribusiness trade) settings. We find that despite an overall strong relationship, Brazil diverges from China’s policies and preferences in important ways, exposing limits on China’s efforts. In addition to tracing major diplomatic statements, we draw on newly collected survey data reflecting Brazilian public opinion on salient issues.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society. "The Ties that Bind?: Affinity and Challenges in Contemporary Brazil-China Relations" is by Pedro Abelin band Margaret M. Pearson (both @univofmaryland.bsky.social). Do give it a read!

#China #Brazil

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

The article makes the case for scrutinising international organisations (IOs) as key sites and agents of inequality reproduction and transformation in international society. Drawing on sociological inequality research and institutionalist approaches to International Relations, we argue that IOs reproduce and transform broader stratification patterns in their global social environment through intertwined processes of categorisation and distribution. We propose to capture these twin processes from three observation points, which highlight different material and symbolic practices operating within IOs and at the interface between IOs and their environment.

Our 2nd pick for November is the #OpenAccess article "Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)Produce Inequalities in International Society" by @carolinefehl.bsky.social (@prif.org) and @ksailormoon.bsky.social (Duisburg-Essen)!

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

As China’s diplomatic and economic outreach towards the Global South has expanded in recent decades, so too have its efforts to align with important Global South countries and create movement away from US hegemony. Brazil’s relationship with China is emblematic, as it is a big player in Latin America and in multilateral bodies, and due to its historical relationship with the United States. While theories about China’s rise lead us to expect that relations between China and Global South countries such as Brazil should be positive and straightforward due to economic interests, normative identity, and successful diplomatic outreach, empirical studies yield mixed results, with challenges arising from host state domestic politics. We explore how Brazil’s domestic policy preferences, public opinion, and polarisation shape China’s ability to achieve its diplomatic goals in multilateral (focusing on BRICS) and bilateral (especially agribusiness trade) settings. We find that despite an overall strong relationship, Brazil diverges from China’s policies and preferences in important ways, exposing limits on China’s efforts. In addition to tracing major diplomatic statements, we draw on newly collected survey data reflecting Brazilian public opinion on salient issues.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society. "The Ties that Bind?: Affinity and Challenges in Contemporary Brazil-China Relations" is by Pedro Abelin band Margaret M. Pearson (both @univofmaryland.bsky.social). Do give it a read!

#China #Brazil

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This paper is a comparative analysis of the anticipatory practices deployed by two international organisations (IOs), UNESCO and the OECD, to govern education futures. I show how their coordination of education futures is mediated by: (1) their different histories, missions, resources and geo-political alliances; (2) use of different anticipatory practices; (3) ongoing tensions between the two organisations around who dominates future-making in education; and (4) the challenges to be negotiated when anticipated futures arrive as a problematic present. My argument develops around three moments of crisis as new arenas for what Ann Mische calls “hyper-projectivity” around futures. In each moment I explore the way UNESCO and the OECD engage in, and compete over, framing, shaping and materialising future presents. In doing so, they claim to be guardians of education futures.

Our first monthly pick for November is "Guardians of the Future: International Organisations, Anticipatory Governance and Education" by Susan L. Robertson (@ Cambridge University). Be sure to give it a read!

#OpenAccess #Anticipation #Governance

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This is your reminder that Global Society has an open call for special issue proposals!

We'd love to hear from you, so please follow the steps below!

This paper is a comparative analysis of the anticipatory practices deployed by two international organisations (IOs), UNESCO and the OECD, to govern education futures. I show how their coordination of education futures is mediated by: (1) their different histories, missions, resources and geo-political alliances; (2) use of different anticipatory practices; (3) ongoing tensions between the two organisations around who dominates future-making in education; and (4) the challenges to be negotiated when anticipated futures arrive as a problematic present. My argument develops around three moments of crisis as new arenas for what Ann Mische calls “hyper-projectivity” around futures. In each moment I explore the way UNESCO and the OECD engage in, and compete over, framing, shaping and materialising future presents. In doing so, they claim to be guardians of education futures.

Our first monthly pick for November is "Guardians of the Future: International Organisations, Anticipatory Governance and Education" by Susan L. Robertson (@ Cambridge University). Be sure to give it a read!

#OpenAccess #Anticipation #Governance

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This is your reminder that Global Society has an open call for special issue proposals!

We'd love to hear from you, so please follow the steps below!

Global Society Volume 39, Issue 4 of Global Society

Global Society Volume 39 Issue 4 has now been published, with over half of the articles published being #OpenAccess. We will highlight each of the articles throughout October.

To access to the full issue now, click the link below!

www.tandfonline.com/toc/cgsj20/3...

Trafficking of women and girls for forced marriage in India is a growing phenomenon. Acute poverty, dowry practices, and precarious family socioeconomic conditions after the COVID-19 pandemic in India have resulted in evidence that young girls are being sold and lured through false promises of employment and good quality of life for the purpose of exploitation. Studying the experiences of 34 Indian trafficking victims, this paper explores and analyses the dynamics of human trafficking for the purpose of marriage and to describe their experiences and health conditions (physical and mental) during the trafficking. Findings revealed that victims were forced to marry before reaching the legal marriage age (18 years), and were subjected to multiple forms of violence, including verbal abuse, threats, physical and sexual violence, which co-occurred in diverse contexts at work and resulted in a wide range of physical health consequences, from head injuries to broken bones and mental health problems. The study concluded on the need for strong implementation of law enforcement in the region to stop the trafficking for forced marriage, including a highly needed intensive awareness program to eradicate patriarchal attitudes and practices on the commoditisation of women, dowry practices, and curb the trafficking network.

Our last article in 39(4) is "Exploitation and Trafficking of Women and Girls for Forced Marriage in India" by Arun Kumar Acharya and Sushree Subhlaxmi Behera (both at Sambalpur University). Do give it a read!

#Exploitation #Trafficking #Violence

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This study explores how the European Union, the United States, and Turkey regulate social media in the face of disinformation, political polarisation, and the erosion of democratic norms. It argues that regulatory responses are not solely technical adjustments but reflect deeper ideological orientations, revealing whether states conceive the digital sphere as a deliberative public arena or as a domain to be governed through security and control logics. Using qualitative document analysis, the research examines 38 key policy and legal documents issued between 2016 and 2024. A thematic and comparative framework is employed across five dimensions: platform accountability, content governance, data privacy, enforcement mechanisms, and user rights. The analysis is informed by Habermas’s theory of the public sphere, Foucault’s concept of governmentality, and broader media governance scholarship. Findings indicate that the EU promotes a rights-based, deliberative model; the U.S. advances a market-oriented logic privileging platform autonomy, while Turkey exhibits a hybrid regime marked by formal pluralism and increasing state intervention. These divergent models not only reflect contrasting political cultures but also reveal how digital governance becomes a key site where state power, democratic values, and technological agency intersect.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society. "Who Controls the Digital Agora? Social Media Governance in the European Union, United States, and Turkey" is by Nuriye Çelik (@ Sinop Üniversitesi). Do give it a read!

#EU #US #Turkey #SocialMedia

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Trafficking of women and girls for forced marriage in India is a growing phenomenon. Acute poverty, dowry practices, and precarious family socioeconomic conditions after the COVID-19 pandemic in India have resulted in evidence that young girls are being sold and lured through false promises of employment and good quality of life for the purpose of exploitation. Studying the experiences of 34 Indian trafficking victims, this paper explores and analyses the dynamics of human trafficking for the purpose of marriage and to describe their experiences and health conditions (physical and mental) during the trafficking. Findings revealed that victims were forced to marry before reaching the legal marriage age (18 years), and were subjected to multiple forms of violence, including verbal abuse, threats, physical and sexual violence, which co-occurred in diverse contexts at work and resulted in a wide range of physical health consequences, from head injuries to broken bones and mental health problems. The study concluded on the need for strong implementation of law enforcement in the region to stop the trafficking for forced marriage, including a highly needed intensive awareness program to eradicate patriarchal attitudes and practices on the commoditisation of women, dowry practices, and curb the trafficking network.

Our last article in 39(4) is "Exploitation and Trafficking of Women and Girls for Forced Marriage in India" by Arun Kumar Acharya and Sushree Subhlaxmi Behera (both at Sambalpur University). Do give it a read!

#Exploitation #Trafficking #Violence

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Discussions about just renewable energy transition tend to focus on helping workers in the energy sector and on creating decent and green jobs. However, given the close interconnections between climate change, inequality, energy transition and the agrifood sector, this article argues that the conceptualisation of just energy transition should be extended to “just energy-agrifood transition”, such that not only principles pertaining to energy justice but also to agrarian justice are considered in a comprehensive manner. From a political ecology and critical political economy perspective, and by drawing on examples from Southeast Asia, the article additionally proposes broad policy guidelines to help advance just energy-agrifood transition. This includes the promotion of universal access to energy and food, technical solutions embedded with progressive socio-economic goals, measures to address negative socio-environmental consequences of food-energy transitions, more egalitarian distribution of green jobs and productive resources, and ground-up approaches to socio-ecologically sustainable agrifood systems.

The sixth article in Global Society 39(4) is by Prapimphan Chiengkul (Thammasat University), titled "Climate Change and Just Energy-Agrifood Transition: A View from Southeast Asia". Be sure to give it a read!

#Justice #Climate #Needs #Conflict

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This study explores how the European Union, the United States, and Turkey regulate social media in the face of disinformation, political polarisation, and the erosion of democratic norms. It argues that regulatory responses are not solely technical adjustments but reflect deeper ideological orientations, revealing whether states conceive the digital sphere as a deliberative public arena or as a domain to be governed through security and control logics. Using qualitative document analysis, the research examines 38 key policy and legal documents issued between 2016 and 2024. A thematic and comparative framework is employed across five dimensions: platform accountability, content governance, data privacy, enforcement mechanisms, and user rights. The analysis is informed by Habermas’s theory of the public sphere, Foucault’s concept of governmentality, and broader media governance scholarship. Findings indicate that the EU promotes a rights-based, deliberative model; the U.S. advances a market-oriented logic privileging platform autonomy, while Turkey exhibits a hybrid regime marked by formal pluralism and increasing state intervention. These divergent models not only reflect contrasting political cultures but also reveal how digital governance becomes a key site where state power, democratic values, and technological agency intersect.

We have a new #OnlineFirst article out in Global Society. "Who Controls the Digital Agora? Social Media Governance in the European Union, United States, and Turkey" is by Nuriye Çelik (@ Sinop Üniversitesi). Do give it a read!

#EU #US #Turkey #SocialMedia

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Discussions about just renewable energy transition tend to focus on helping workers in the energy sector and on creating decent and green jobs. However, given the close interconnections between climate change, inequality, energy transition and the agrifood sector, this article argues that the conceptualisation of just energy transition should be extended to “just energy-agrifood transition”, such that not only principles pertaining to energy justice but also to agrarian justice are considered in a comprehensive manner. From a political ecology and critical political economy perspective, and by drawing on examples from Southeast Asia, the article additionally proposes broad policy guidelines to help advance just energy-agrifood transition. This includes the promotion of universal access to energy and food, technical solutions embedded with progressive socio-economic goals, measures to address negative socio-environmental consequences of food-energy transitions, more egalitarian distribution of green jobs and productive resources, and ground-up approaches to socio-ecologically sustainable agrifood systems.

The sixth article in Global Society 39(4) is by Prapimphan Chiengkul (Thammasat University), titled "Climate Change and Just Energy-Agrifood Transition: A View from Southeast Asia". Be sure to give it a read!

#Justice #Climate #Needs #Conflict

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

This paper analyses the construction of “gender ideology” (GI) as a strategic enemy of the radical right in a context of radicalisation of neoliberalism in South America. Drawing on studies on the radical right and anti-gender movements, the paper suggests that the growing influence of feminist and LGBTQI+ struggles have been contested by the cultural backlash of conservative mobilisations and of the radical right. In that framework, the paper shows the confluence between religious and political anti-gender activism, recovering epistemic, moral, ideological and geopolitical dimensions that explain the erection of GI as a strategic and absolute enemy of the radical right. Then, the paper discusses anti-gender movements as a reaction against advances in sexual and reproductive rights and analyses the similarities and differences between discourses, policies and contexts of Milei and Bolsonaro. Hence, the article discusses how GI has enabled a right-wing intersectionality, which defends racial, gendered and class hierarchies against the movements that challenge them. It concludes by posing authoritarian neoliberalism and radical right-wing populism as a threat to liberal democracy and the rule of law.

The fifth article of Global Society 39(4) is "“Gender Ideology” as a Strategic Enemy of the Radical Right in South America: The Cases of Bolsonaro and Milei" by Matías Leandro Saidel (CONICET/ National University of Entre Ríos)!

#Gender #Ideology #Neoliberalism

www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

In memoriam: Professor A J R (‘John’) Groom It is with sadness that we bring the news that former BISA Chair, Professor Groom has passed away.

You can read Richard Whitman's memoriam to Professor Groom below:

www.bisa.ac.uk/news/memoria...

Global Society A.J.R. Groom: An Academic Tribute. Volume 32, Issue 2 of Global Society

In 2018, we celebrated Professor Groom's scholarship in special issue dedicated to him, which you can read below.

www.tandfonline.com/toc/cgsj20/3...