So like normal?
03.02.2026 15:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@columnist.bsky.social
‘The view from the column is ever distant’
So like normal?
03.02.2026 15:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Errrr no
03.02.2026 15:24 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Sure but as you know will know that’s a very very tricky talent in prime time situations
03.02.2026 15:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ah ok by ‘government’ I mean current leadership not the current elections.
03.02.2026 15:19 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0So sorry to hear of all of this. My sister in law had it a while ago and was no fun at all.
03.02.2026 15:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I am thinking that our decision to get the shingrex vaccine was a good idea…
03.02.2026 15:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Quoi?
03.02.2026 15:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yeah so this is bring down the government territory if there’s more to come (you woudn’t bet against it) so I think we’ll seem some weird stuff over the next few days.
03.02.2026 15:04 — 👍 30 🔁 0 💬 11 📌 0Nah this has way more legs
03.02.2026 15:02 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The whole thing is 🤯
03.02.2026 15:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0At this point it seems completely unbelievable that someone won’t have to resign re the PL debacle…
03.02.2026 14:59 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 4 📌 0Incidentally, this is a major problem with *theory*.
03.02.2026 14:57 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0💯 actually makes me feel sick
03.02.2026 14:55 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes so if one assumes things are fundamentally uncertain vs certain on a probabilistic basis (not everything is equally uncertain) but those probabilities move around in quite startling ways…you end up with a v complex changing picture…occasionally crystallized by (say) elections…
03.02.2026 14:54 — 👍 8 🔁 3 💬 3 📌 0Genuinely freaks me out that this is what my phd ended up being about but from a completely different direction.
03.02.2026 14:48 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There you go. I knew you’d be interested.
03.02.2026 14:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Choke *1066*
03.02.2026 14:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0(The essential problem is finding physical substitutes for complicated systems moving over time in unpredictable ways)
03.02.2026 14:40 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’d be most interested in quantum physics style metaphorical language…
@paulmainwood.bsky.social @gro-tsen.bsky.social
Ah yes so it’s simply impossible not to use metaphorical language (one can debate why that is but it’s broadly true). The challenge is to use better metaphorical language. And the lever stuff is absolutely the worst.
03.02.2026 14:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0(From Epstein’s perspective the value of PM as a source must have been huge…)
03.02.2026 14:29 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’m not exactly naive but I’m flabbergasted
03.02.2026 14:28 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Don’t know about you but all the financial crisis era shenanigans are making me feel very cross
03.02.2026 14:26 — 👍 17 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0What on earth is the sandwich bag thing
03.02.2026 09:20 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Somewhat relatedly I’m a little surprised there aren’t more senior UK public figures inhabiting the files…
03.02.2026 09:13 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 6 📌 0I’m going to be very surprised if this isn’t a huge problem!
03.02.2026 09:02 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Nooooo
02.02.2026 21:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It’s literally not a hypothesis. It’s a metaphor. Something more and less than a hypothesis.
02.02.2026 21:45 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s ofc absolutely no surprise that we seek to explain things in terms of physical phenomena we have collectively observed (~ metaphor).
02.02.2026 21:40 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This looks really interesting
02.02.2026 21:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0