The left image is not even close to what I can see by make π: it comes from the stellarium app and it shows what I could see w/o clouds and, overall, the extremely high light pollution (right image).
/fin
@manlius.bsky.social
Emergence, Networks & Complexity | Collective Behavior(s) from Cells to Societies π§¬π¦ π§ π Prof. @UniPadova, Galileo's University | Lab: @comunelab.bsky.social | Web: https://linktr.ee/manlius Thoughts at manlius.substack.com
The left image is not even close to what I can see by make π: it comes from the stellarium app and it shows what I could see w/o clouds and, overall, the extremely high light pollution (right image).
/fin
Why it's so exciting?
W/ naked π I saw only 3 stars
W/ the old setup I could take only shots for 0.9s to avoid trailing stars
Now, after a rough (obviously manual) alignment to Polaris, I can easily capture for 10+s, enhancing the signal to noise ratio by order of magnitude.
Now I aim at 30s.
This Pic could appear insignificant to many, but it's gamechanging for me.
For technical reasons and βοΈβοΈ I could point only to the area covered by the red square: this time, the 1st, with my π· positioned on my new star tracker. There are about 1200 stars captured in that red square!
1/
Americans: after the dismantling of science and civil rights, do you really want someone positioning nuclear submarines in response to a tweet?
I mean, I can't understand this world. This is out of control. Where are we heading?
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Thanks Ricard! π
01.08.2025 17:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Max Planck was once advised not to study physics because "everything important had already been discovered."
Luckily, he didnβt listen. And neither should we.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Late-stage capitalism is reaching its most paradoxical form:
AI systems that profile you, predict you and increasingly choose for you.
A poetic irony, if it werenβt such a disturbing trajectory.
www.linkedin.com/posts/rebecc...
Late-stage capitalism is reaching its most paradoxical form:
AI systems that profile you, predict you and increasingly choose for you.
A poetic irony, if it werenβt such a disturbing trajectory.
www.linkedin.com/posts/rebecc...
Climate change in action
Water stressed areas around the world form a band around the northern lower-to mid-latitudes
As if atmospheric circulation which carries heat from the equator to the poles has been disrupted
www.ft.com/content/e67a...
If you are curious about how to assess the emergence of network functionality in empirical systems and why modeling and first principles matter to study #ComplexSystems, let's meet at the #CCS2025 in Siena, 1st September π
28.07.2025 07:21 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0#FunctionalTraits π§ͺπ
28.07.2025 07:07 β π 13 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Nature weaves on the loom of complexity: light with darkness, chaos with calm, destruction with creation.
Until beauty emerges from turbulence.
Pictures are my own: all rights reserved.
27.07.2025 06:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Nature weaves on the loom of complexity: light with darkness, chaos with calm, destruction with creation.
Until beauty emerges from turbulence.
Got it! Many thanks π
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Ricard, do you know published papers from him about this topic?
26.07.2025 09:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0To me, part of this is that these βbillionaire geniusesβ are so bought in to the myth of their own brilliance that their ego canβt acknowledge how they just happened to be standing next to a money making machine at the right moment in history, and that their contributions rest on the work of others.
12.07.2025 14:22 β π 545 π 106 π¬ 16 π 3LLMs don't lie because they want to. They lie because they're trained to role-play, reinforced to please and lack grounding in truth.
This misalignment isn't just theoretical: itβs showing up in fabricated data, hallucinated praise, even red-teamed blackmail.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
LLMs don't lie because they want to. They lie because they're trained to role-play, reinforced to please and lack grounding in truth.
This misalignment isn't just theoretical: itβs showing up in fabricated data, hallucinated praise, even red-teamed blackmail.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
A beautiful instant, vanishingly brief in space and time against the backdrop of the cosmos' evolution.
24.07.2025 22:29 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you caught some of my summerβconference sessions, youβve already seen how the network density matrix and emergent latent geometry let us quantify a system's functionality.
While I finish an updated post, here's a concise #ComplexityThoughts refresher π
#NetworkScience #ComplexSystems
If you caught some of my summerβconference sessions, youβve already seen how the network density matrix and emergent latent geometry let us quantify a system's functionality.
While I finish an updated post, here's a concise #ComplexityThoughts refresher π
#NetworkScience #ComplexSystems
I think that from APS there is publicly available data. After all, that's not representative of all STEM at all.
Still: do we have any plausible argument to think that other fields will behave differently?
"our results indicate that academia pays a price by focusing attention and resources on superstars"
Nice to see this supported by data analysis, now.
H/T: @cxdig.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Cool that to go to the venue, we must wait here
21.07.2025 08:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0On my way to this amazing venue to talk about how to assess the emergence of functionality in empirical complex networks.
Coarse graining, mesoscale, multiscale signal propagation, and much more.
If you are in Venice, show up and say hello!
#ComplexSystems
Sure, the idea is lovely.
But before registering I was wondering if the corresponding podcast entries and the materials will be behind paywall.
Yep
20.07.2025 16:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do you know if the patreon material is accessible only after subscription?
Is that subscription free?
Sure, every study comes with its own limitations. Here just APS data, and the choice of H-index as metric (which is plausibly broadly used to assess superstars).
It gives a good hint.