Kinda made this thread cuz I got sick of people on this site saying shit like "WOODY WOODPECKER WAS NEVER GOOD AND IS JUST ANNOYING" or "WOODY WAS ONLY GOOD IN THE 40'S, EVERYTHING ELSE SUCKS" when it isn't true in the slightest
It's just really lame in general to act as if ALL those studios made only "bad" cartoons and that there isn't any worth to discussing them imo
I can assure you that Walter Lantz, Screen gems, Famous Studios, Van Beuren etc. have their fair share of funny cartoons no matter what Leonard Maltin's glorious animation book says. Take a risk and go watch some of their shorts instead of following 'toon dogma all your life
My favorite thing about golden age cartoon discussion is how every single studio that isn't WB, MGM, or Disney gets labelled as "le slop cartoon studio" and gets ignored by people who can't think for themselves as they talk about the same jones, clampett, and tom & jerry shorts over and over again
nautical nonsense from the other app
forgot i was on here
damn also made his chin too long
accidentally made sylvester's head long while doing this study of a funnie from "crowing pains" (1948)
I'm Jim Tyered of this shit
sticky notes bob i saw @notray1995.bsky.social post on the lower version of this app
drawn by stephen hillenburg
THE NEXT CARTOON SENSATION (s)
dragon couple
doodles (you find more on twitter)
fred is fun to draw
even more
bob clampett cartoons!
The bubble bath conspiracy
?????
