Someone please tell this young feller he needs to put spaces between his letters Gobbless

@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social

Has anyone checked Mar a Lardo for Napoleon's crown jewels?

"Proposed". and "or". Is it in the US Constitution? I'll give you another day or so to learn how to read since critical thinking seems beyond your current capacity.

I might check Blusky tomorrow.

It demonstrates Catholics raising an "army" and overthrowing the Protestants.

Stop. This is a satire. I've read it. It means the "market-man" could serve as a soldier.

This, is a military usage, not a civilian one. Several others are equally irrelevant.

I'm not hiding anything. It's what the Constitution says and that is not what you claim it says. There is no prohibition in the Constitution against the Federal government making laws that regulate guns.

Find a State Constitution that does not largely reiterate what is in the United States Constitution.

Go right ahead, meanwhile Americans will just keep dying for you.

You'll find that most states just went ahead and adopted the Bill of Rights in their own Constitutions.

Wasn't written until 1818.

If "drunk with power" was a milk carton.

TOP NEWS TODAY 🔝 20 October 2025 — Meanwhile in Ukraine Post by Meanwhile in Ukraine

Europe moves to cut Russian gas and tighten sanctions while Kyiv fast-tracks air defense and rejects any “Donbas deal.” Moscow escalates strikes; the West debates Tomahawks and next-steps.

https://buymeacoffee.com/meaninuak/top-news-today-20-october-2025

Tens of thousands of Americans die year after year because of opinions like yours.

Hey you're spewing irrelevant references here. I'll look stuff up when and if I feel like it. Because I do not work for you.

Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833) Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore: The Bill of Rights applies only to the federal government rather than state or local governments, since there is no textual evidence to support a different...

BTW the opinion that the B of R didn't apply to the states, wasn't the work of the Founders. It wasn't until 1833. So your case falls apart right there. supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...

I already answered multiple times.

YOU look up that document. I do not work for you.

To "bear arms" is a distinct phrase. What we are seeing here is an author, trying to stretch the term into something it isn't.

Also beware when you can't access the full document when an author has a bias.

That's an entirely different term than the distinct phrase "bear arms". Irrelevant and obfuscating.

So what do YOU think the Founders were saying here?

I'm the one who should be insulted, you're the one who never bothered to read the two most essential documents in American History. It's that lack of knowledge that the gun lobby capitalizes on.

I've been posting facts the whole time. You even tried to duck down a Henry VIII rabbit hole. Americans are dying by the tens of thousands based on the opinions you're parroting.

The 2A doesn't do what you claim and you posted only opinions having nothing to do with the Founders. You never read the Declaration of Independence, or the Constitution before.

You never actually studied this topic before have you.

The 2nd Amendment says nothing either way on the topic of gun confiscation laws.