omer

[in that regard, liberals and centrists are prone to hypocrisy much more than any of their political opponents from any side. they also seem to be the least self aware. whether it’s because they generally aren’t or conniving i usually can’t tell]

and if they are being self aware vocally about being a grifter, then i feel they might actually get a different treatment, something in the vain of ‘better the devil you know…”, it doesn’t serve to redeem their politics, but to save their character, mostly from liberal attacks on hypocrisy tho

oh that’s funny, i forgot self awareness as a quality can be something that is completely internalized in the sense that is devout of ironically or sincerely voiced. how many grifters tell you explicitly they are grifting? [it’s not a rhetoric question, i actually don’t know]

חחחח בגלל שאין כאן יישור לימין לעברית חשבתי שה״(אחרי נרמול)״ בהודעה קודמת שלך מתייחס לכוסיין סימילריטי כי זה כתוב באנגלית. אוברכורכטינג די מטורף מצידי

is it lacking legibility? this is nitpicking tho the more pressing question is imo is what if legibility is not really possible even when we judge ourselves?

2. this taps into another question the my irony poisoned soul gas grappled with: the supposed redeeming quality of self awareness

ok these aren’t fully formed thoughts but
regarding 1: this is a beautiful observation imo what came into my mind is say visibly queer ppl who are also religious, for example. the contradiction does not negate their existence, they are living within it. they don’t necessarily lay an argumant

אבל זה כן כונספציה שונה של מרחק, לא??
אם כוסינוס נותן לך תוצאות טובות יותר זה אומר שהכיוון חשוב יותר מהמרחק עבור שליפה

but js there any merit at all, to the insistence on consistency? being flippant is obviously repugnant, but holding contradicting beliefs isn’t obviously so

ever since al aqsa flood i’ve seen so many arguments online derailing into “you’re not morally consistent!,””” e.g two ppl who’ll agree on palestine and would go on to disagree on ukraine or syria. these positions can be made “morally”/“intellectually” consistent with different frameworks

is there actually any significance, in your opinion, to intellectual consistency?
not ofc in the shallow ad hominem sense cuz lmao or the obvious “they used to belive X, now they are advocating for ~X” cuz ppl do change their minds

i’m really enjoying! just started the women question part of the pilot

i have many thoughts none of which are interesting but i’ll use part of the discussion on his life and the circumstance of his successes and intellectual quality of his writing to ask a bigger question i have

ye b

i didn’t know you were hosting a podcast sarah! i will listen 🥰❤️ xx

ogey

hi

what’s acategory?

they’ve been hiding so much stuff from me omgg??

who should i follow if i want the end of the zionist entity and i also like music and films and books and i kinda know math but not too well aanymore

what are you guys doing on this site? i just log in every once in a while to see what ramona brendan sarah and olivia are up to

my name is omer and i'm really glad to meet you. you were recommended to me by some people

all you are is we, by Emma Goldman 12 track album

more ppl who like sass should listen to emma goldman’s album
emma-goldman.bandcamp.com/album/all-yo...

ogey <3 have a good night b

hi b are you familiar with the band "first day back"

UK politics is so intellectually exhausted that they just launched like their eighth ostensibly left political party with the twist of hating trans people and muslims

סליי רק לך אכפת

לאף אחד לא אכפת מה אני חושב על האלמנט הפנטסטי בדיסכו אליסיום סתם יצאתי נודניק

לאף אחד לא אכפת 🤦‍♂️

אני חושב שמה שמעניין בעל־טבעי בדיסכו אליסיום זה לא שהוא לא נסתר, אלא שהוא בסיס אונטולוגי למציאות, לשוהים בעולם יש גישה אליה: הפייל לדעתי המשמעותי מבינהם, אבל גפ השיברז, הט׳וט כבינט, האינלנד אמפייר ובסוף הףאסמיג. האלמנט הפנטסטי הוא לא קסם, אלא מטאפיזיקה ציבורית שהיא נחלת הכלל

עמר עדעכונים

דה איירון דרואיד כרוניכלס?