New on Early View: "Rethinking Face-to-Face Interaction: Lessons from Studies of “Autistic Sociality”" by Lars E. F. Johannessen doi.org/10.1002/symb... #sssi #sociology #interactionism #autism #sociality
22.08.2025 10:38 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1@larsjohannessen.bsky.social
Sociologist and Prof. in Knowledge, Expertise and Professions at Oslo Metropolitan University • Fellow at Center for Cultural Sociology, Yale University • Digital culture • Qualitative methods • Theorizing • Microsociology • STS
New on Early View: "Rethinking Face-to-Face Interaction: Lessons from Studies of “Autistic Sociality”" by Lars E. F. Johannessen doi.org/10.1002/symb... #sssi #sociology #interactionism #autism #sociality
22.08.2025 10:38 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 1✨ New publication ✨
Face-to-face is often treated as the “gold standard” of interaction. My new article shows how autistic sociality complicates this view, revealing alternative ways of connecting.
Available open access in Symbolic Interaction:
#sociology #anthrosky #autism #neurodiversity
Reading list:
Theorizing in Times of Crisis, Fragmentation and Disorder (2025)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Abstract This article argues that in an age of artificial intelligence (AI), sociologists have not adequately thought about the challenges posed to their work and pedagogy. Drawing on examples from Hong Kong, we foreground the challenges that AI poses to sociological education, student success and working conditions, amid the marketization of higher education and broad shifts in funding toward STEM disciplines. We then suggest four tactical strategies for sociology to respond and live with AI: (1) incorporating computational training into sociological education; (2) incorporating AI into instrument design for sociological research; (3) incorporating AI into models of inference; and (4) incorporating AI into classroom and campus design. We contend that, in doing so, we may rethink the repertoires of professional sociology with new frontiers for AI applications and modalities of student education.
Reading list:
The promises and perils of AI for sociology (Au & Fong, 2025, published in Sociology)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Thanks! She has been a nice little companion so far! :-)
31.07.2025 13:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A selfie of me trying to rock a dual monitor-setting in our couch while our new baby sleeps on my chest
Work-life (im)balance
31.07.2025 12:30 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0First-person picture of our new baby sleeping on my chest while I'm reading a nice little book
Optimal combo
03.07.2025 08:24 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I seems to be fixed on my end now, but let me know if you still experience any issues!
21.06.2025 09:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thanks for the notice! I'm on vacation but will see if I can fix it nonetheless.
21.06.2025 08:54 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 030+ microsociologists in Trondheim
Time for day one of the Norwegian microsociology meeting! Look at this beautiful room of people 😍
16.06.2025 08:32 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Nice water view at 10 pm in Trondheim
It's finally here: the second annual meeting of the Norwegian Microsociological Network! This year we're in Trondheim, with Gary Alan Fine and Iddo Tavory as special guests. The drinks reception is over; now we have two full days of talks to look forward to 🤠
15.06.2025 20:03 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Reading list:
Monika Krause (2024): Theorizing from Neglected Cases
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
My not so impressive view of the livestream
Hartmut Rosa just gave the Vilhelm Aubert memorial lecture at the University of Oslo. The guy packed two auditoriums (!) and half of us had to watch on livestream.
24.04.2025 13:43 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Currently reading "Generative AI for academics" by @drmarkcarrigan.bsky.social It's a refreshing, sociological take on a topic dominated by self-help books, and Mark is particularly good at articulating his ambivalence towards GenAI and what it means for scholarship.
15.03.2025 07:55 — 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0The list of words the Trump administration has banned from research grants is even longer than the lists I’ve seen online. Here are screenshots of the words confirmed by the NYTimes and listed in this article www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
08.03.2025 08:33 — 👍 426 🔁 310 💬 32 📌 132Isaac A. Reed gave a brilliant guest lecture at @oslomet.bsky.social earlier this week, discussing the balance between under- and overinterpretation when using theory in empirical social research. The lecture can be seen here: youtu.be/3vmmafrv9kY?...
#sociology #philsky
That would be a "drita full professor"
14.02.2025 05:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's a Nordic thing!
13.02.2025 18:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Rookie mistake!
13.02.2025 13:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That would be "bakfull professor". Completely different ballgame.
13.02.2025 13:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Fun fact: "Full professor" means "drunk professor" in Norwegian.
13.02.2025 13:17 — 👍 49 🔁 1 💬 4 📌 0Abstract New technology brings new methodological opportunities. While long limited to face-to-face interviewing, today’s interview researchers can choose from a plethora of options, including email, instant messaging, telephone, and video interviews. Consequently, the issue of interview modes and their relative strengths and weaknesses has received increased attention. In this article, we take stock of existing writings on interview modes in qualitative interview research. Drawing on key insights from more general theorizing about face-to-face and remote interaction, we identify and challenge five key assumptions in writings about interview modes: (1) that physical copresence ensures more and better data; (2) that interview modes have determinate effects on interaction; (3) that remote interviewing should seek to replicate face-to-face interviewing; (4) that interviews modes should be held constant within each study; and (5) that face-to-face interviewing is unmediated. We counter each assumption with a series of more productive methodological principles and advance instead a view we call interview mode pluralism, which offers a more nuanced and relational understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different interview modes. The article thus helps increase the methodological literacy of those conducting and evaluating qualitative interview research, enhancing the likelihood that researchers select those tools best suited for their tasks, and reducing the chance that evaluators dismiss research based on their methodological prejudice.
📢 New paper 📢
We bust 5 myths about face-to-face vs. remote interviewing and argue for "interview mode pluralism" as a more context-aware way of assessing the strengths and weaknesses of different interview modes.
Link: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
#Sociology #comsky #STS
Smug ski selfie
Went off pist for a short while and left my mark in the snow
A beautiful sunny day at Storefjell
Random horse grassing (?) in the snow
Went skiing for the first time in 10+ years. Fell on my ass a handful of times. Met a horse. Good times.
01.02.2025 11:11 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Overall assessment Considering the submitted material and of the criteria for promotion laid down in the regulations, guidelines for assessment of competence in hiring and promotion at OsloMet, the Committee finds, based on the academic portfolio, education, academic degrees, scientific papers, participation in management of research and development projects, work experience, and pedagogical qualifications, that Lars Emil Fagernes Johannessen is highly qualified for promotion to the post of professor in knowledge, expertise and professions. The conclusion is unanimous and indubitable
Mountain view from my hotel room at Storefjell
Got promoted to full professor today! AND I'm at a mountain resort for three days of sociological bliss. It's going to be one hell of a weekend!
31.01.2025 11:08 — 👍 135 🔁 1 💬 8 📌 0The Fremen walk works though! I haven't fallen on my ass in several years 😎
27.01.2025 18:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The trolley meme but with Dolly Parton controlling the lever
Can I interest you in a Trolley Parton?
27.01.2025 06:44 — 👍 36 🔁 3 💬 2 📌 0Correction: The future of MEANINGFUL work. Blargh.
26.01.2025 08:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Title: Automating Technologies and the Future of Meaningful Work When artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies change the content of people’s work, will people lose the link to what makes their work meaningful or will it free them up to do more meaningful work? The main objective of the AUTOMA project is to explore how AI and related technologies affect work and the opportunities and/or challenges this entails with regard to meaningful work. The project aims to develop a deeper philosophical understanding of the factors that make work meaningful, while also collecting new empirical data on how the perception of meaningful work is affected when tasks and skills that were previously reserved for people are digitalised to a greater degree. The AUTOMA project consists of two work packages: one aimed at a philosophical and normative analysis of ‘meaningful work’ and one aimed at an empirical examination of meaningful work in workplaces where AI and related technologies have been adopted.
My department at @oslomet.bsky.social is hiring a postdoc for the project "Automating technologies and the future of work". Application deadline: 24 February 2025. Read more here: www.oslomet.no/en/work/job-...
#sts #commsky #philsky #sociology
This is too good to be true <3
"Many qualitative methodological approaches are already very vibey [...] In this article, I reflect on these approaches and outline some vibes-based methods. I discuss how vibes-based methods help us consider and work with the generative ambiguities of social life."