@danielheck.bsky.social
Professor of Psychological Methods @Phillips-Universtät Marburg Mathematical psychology | Cognitive modeling | Psychometrics | Bayesian statistics Personal: www.dwheck.de Team: https://www.uni-marburg.de/de/fb04/team-heck
Konservative 🤝Rechtsextreme = politischer Selbstmord?
In vielen EU-Ländern versuchen konservative Parteien durch Kooperationen, rechtsextreme Parteien zu „zähmen“. Die CDU-nahe Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung hat untersucht, was das für Konsequenzen hat. Spoiler: Es funktioniert nicht. 1/6🧵
That's interesting - thanks for comparing the methods and for letting me know!
Analytical solutions are of course more elegant than numerical integration.
For all who use Bayesian hierarchical models, have a look at our new preprint, out now together with @linushof.bsky.social @nunobusch.bsky.social and @thorstenpachur.bsky.social
osf.io/preprints/ps...
Still, it is worthwile to have a paper elaborating on this in detail!
16.09.2025 11:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Just a remark regarding "The same incorrect computation appears in implementations of latent-trait multinomial processing tree models":
The issue has been mentioned in the literature (shorturl.at/Ajx0W), and the R package TreeBUGS has the function probitInverse as a solution (shorturl.at/mRp1S).
Looks and reads great, I especially like the concise figure!
This is an important issue which is often overlooked, so the contribution will be useful for many modelers. 👍
New paper showing that both the test–retest stability and the split-half reliability of the repetition-based truth effect is close to zero:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
At the FORRT Replication Hub, our mission is to support researchers who want to replicate previous findings. We have now published a big new component with which we want to fulfill this mission: An open access handbook for reproduction and replication studies: forrt.org/replication_...
03.09.2025 06:54 — 👍 59 🔁 35 💬 2 📌 2Help us show there is support for offering registered reports at one of Psychology's leading method's journal! chng.it/TwwnVBScVb
21.08.2025 18:44 — 👍 15 🔁 6 💬 0 📌 3Reading this and trying to take in the full enormity of what is happening. The scale of it. open.substack.com/pub/christin...
21.08.2025 20:30 — 👍 457 🔁 170 💬 15 📌 121/3 I think the premise is worth some attention: why is there a (frequently wrong) expectation that science is precise? I am often confused even by textbooks for university student audiences. Confused about how frequently findings and expert judgements are portrayed as certain and final.
22.07.2025 15:39 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0It would be good to learn already in school that uncertainty is a fundamental aspect of science.
I guess people generally dislike being in a cognitive state of uncertainty. But I vaguely remember some studies showing that scientists are better at coping with it.
"Science is expected to be precise, and admissions of uncertainty (especially large levels) can be perceived as scientific failures, rather than natural limitations of knowledge of a topic." 😕
Broomell et al. (2025). Expert judgment and communication of uncertainty. doi.org/10.1007/978-...
Just submitted a minor bugfix of RRreg to CRAN:
github.com/danheck/RRre...
The R package focuses on analyzing univariate & multivariate data collected with the Randomized Response Technique (RRT), which protects anonymity in surveys by randomly scrambling responses.
I also added a new logo 🚀
What an incredible resource from the indefatigable @chrischirp.bsky.social . No one can say we didn't know -- it's all happening in broad daylight.
22.07.2025 06:09 — 👍 29 🔁 10 💬 1 📌 0Ein ganz ganz wichtiger Text in diesen Zeiten. "Die vorliegende Kampagne gegen eine deutsche Top-Juristin ist nichts anderes als ein weiterer Versuch der Trumpisierung deutscher Politik. [...] es liegt kurzum an wirklich allen Demokraten, dies nicht zuzulassen." 👊
22.07.2025 06:57 — 👍 74 🔁 18 💬 1 📌 0of course, we also need a new badge!
08.07.2025 09:35 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0proper link: osf.io/preprints/os...
08.07.2025 09:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The effort by the authors is laudable and may be useful in itself.
But I am not sure where all the checklists will lead us...
Yet another checklist for science 🚀
✅A checklist...
✅for incentivizing...
✅and facilitating...
✅good theory building
✅https://osf.io/preprints/osf/7qvfz_v2
Luckily enough, we can nowadays use AI to fill out all the checklists during the research process 😅
Here's a paper with a skeleton of the idea, but there is really lots of research to do on the structure of workflow networks, now to make them robust, how to development diagnostics and calculi for steps within them. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
03.07.2025 06:56 — 👍 65 🔁 15 💬 1 📌 3Experimentology cover: title and curves for distributions.
Experimentology is out today!!! A group of us wrote a free online textbook for experimental methods, available at experimentology.io - the idea was to integrate open science into all aspects of the experimental workflow from planning to design, analysis, and writing.
01.07.2025 18:25 — 👍 534 🔁 228 💬 10 📌 15Simplifying ethics applications and their evaluation 👍
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) provides a free webtool for ethics proposals in collaboration with #Chemnitz #University of #Technology
👉 ethiktool.org/en
Thank you @volkswagenstiftung.de
#ethic #psychology #humanities
Please read this article.
Once you see it, you can't not see it.
And it will make you a better consumer of the news and therefore a better and more informed citizen.
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
#WissenschaftlicheIntegrität: Die Leitung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeitseinheit trägt die #Verantwortung für die gesamte Einheit. Leitlinie 4 des #GWP Kodex beschäftigt sich mit Aufgaben, Rollen & Pflichten - auch in Bezug auf Karriereförderung oder Machtmissbrauch:
fcld.ly/rcy0aos
A few months ago, Nature published how-to guide for using ChatGPT to write your peer reviews in 30 minutes.
This is, of course, a horrible idea. Here’s my response with @jbakcoleman.bsky.social .
Paper by @lknochelmann.bsky.social now published in the European Journal of Social Psychology 🥳
In an intervention tournament, we investigated how to best enhance a person’s intellectual humility.
--> doi.org/10.1002/ejsp...
Thanks for this overview!
A related issue regarding the mixed results is the ambiguity of fluency theories regarding the required boundary conditions:
If the manipulation is too salient, it is assumed that people can discount the effect; but if it is too weak, there might be no effect at all. 😕
Research on processing fluency used to be very popular with publications in Psychological Science, PNAS, etc. Now there are several prominent failed replications of fluency effects. A newest one: bsky.app/profile/dani... >
13.06.2025 06:52 — 👍 7 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0