Sysiphus

Lee Strobel’s evidence doesn’t prove God scientifically—science tests natural causes, not the supernatural.

How can something so simple create things that are complex (like us)?

You “see” the author and don’t ask “did I invent the author?”

Oversized Amygdala: There is no conclusive evidence that conservatives have an "oversized" amygdala. While some studies have found differences in brain structure between liberals and conservatives, these findings are complex and cannot be reduced to simple cause-and-effect.

Conservative Psyche: The claim that conservatives are motivated by fear, greed, and cowardice is a broad generalization. Psychological studies suggest that conservative individuals may prioritize stability, tradition, and social order. These traits do not inherently equate to fear or cowardice.

Amygdala Function: The amygdala is involved in processing emotions, including fear, but it is not solely a "fear center." It also plays roles in aggression, reward processing, and linking emotions to memories. Labeling it as the "reptilian FEAR CENTER" is an oversimplification.

Sure bro. The intellect is clear for all to see. You are the refuting master.

Tut tut.

5. Hasty Generalization: The tweet makes broad generalizations about voters and their beliefs without sufficient evidence to support such sweeping claims.
These fallacies undermine the argument's validity and make it less persuasive.

4. Slippery Slope: The claim that voting for a particular candidate will lead to a "Fascist Theocratic Totalitarian DICTATORSHIP" is an example of this fallacy. It assumes without sufficient evidence that one action will inevitably lead to extreme and undesirable outcomes.

3. Ad Hominem: By labeling someone a "Nazi" based on their vote, the tweet attacks the person rather than addressing the actual argument or policy differences.

2. False Dilemma: The tweet presents a binary choice, implying that voting for a certain political party automatically makes one a Nazi, ignoring the complexity and diversity of political beliefs and motivations.

@irondonkey.bsky.social
This tweet contains logical fallacies:
1. No True Scotsman: The statement "there's no such thing as a Conservative Atheist" is an example of this fallacy. It arbitrarily redefines the criteria for being an atheist to exclude conservative, which is not a valid argument.

How about I just invoke spontaneous symmetry breaking in SU(2)xU(1) group theory applied to 3 dimensions. I get logic as a Lie group and define all the fundamental particle plus space-time. I created the universe ! Am I god?

“God is the process of that very logical unfolding, not a separate entity.” Is that true?

You always have to ask “is it true?” You are right, logic is the true substrate to reality. Not your definition of god. You are stuck in the video game of logic. Logic govern, not God. Walk into the light of truth Bro, before it’s too late.

You are just defining God using statements. They can be proven either true or false, ergo epistemology is the substrate to which your God definition is measured. Thus, God is not ultimate. The relationship between belief and knowledge is. Atheists are outside your FPS - First Person Sermon.

Atheism with Karma?

Let’s do meme wars not religious ones (less death)

“How “X” is better than any other religion” - by a follower of religion “X”. Blistering balderdash Batman, a hypocrite.

Which god? There are so many we lose count. And which book should I refer too?

Christian Atheism If we want to be true atheists, do we have to begin with a religious edifice and undermine it from within?Slavoj Žižek has long been a commentator on, and criti…

Bro! WTF

www.bloomsbury.com/au/christian...

I say go with it.

What a time to be alive. How are we going to describe this time to our grandchildren? Who in history witnessed such a thing? Russians in 1917? Americans in 1816? English in 1642 ?

Don’t forget humble.

What’s the denominator for most investments ?

When you create a wallet (like an email address and password) you get a public and private keys. Buying coins gets them send them to your public address (also called wallet). The blockchain records your balance to the wallet. Only you have the private key to send on to anyone else.

Looks like it was written by McKinsey consultants. They always love a good working group.

Have an opinion.

And don’t forget Jesus. He didn’t believe in God either and the bible is totalitarian.
Exodus 22:20
“Whoever sacrifices to any other god … MuST Be DeSTROyeD!” (Emphasis my own)