So you can’t back it up. Got it.
Don’t be surprised when everyone rejects your “opinion” as empty, you waste of oxygen.
Patting people on the back for making empty claims isn’t the W you think it is.
If you’re going to call someone racist, you need to be prepared to back that shit up.
Still waiting on the “race hustling”.
No. No it isn’t. You can’t just wave your hands and make your claim true.
You have to show evidence.
Nope. One is race baiting, the other…is not.
Not the same coin at all.
That’s all I was looking for, thanks!
How does a concept exhibit anything?
It’s the person doing the conceptualizing who does the exhibition.
You skipped a step there. How does all that lead to “therefore gods”?
Still waiting for the “race hustling” explanation.
How does “speaking the flip side” = “race baiting”?
Isn’t the flip side of race baiting NOT race baiting?
He does?
Based on…?
"My opinion"
And that opinion is based on...?
"And my understanding"
That is based on...?
Repeating a baseless claim doesn't make the claim true.
One thing is for certain, for better or worse: everyone alive right now will be leaving a very different world than they were born into, and that is not true of most of human history.
"That’s my understanding and opinion"
Based on...?
Did he defrock and excommunicate the pedophile priests? Did he turn them over to the proper authorities?
Did he decide to give away the obscene wealth the Vatican hoards?
Did he tell Catholic hospitals to provide healthcare for free?
No?
Then you can STFU about anything else that evil man says.
Did he say anything about defrocking pedophile priests and turning them over to the proper authorities?
Di he say anything about the obscene wealth hoarded by the Vatican?
No?
Then shut up about him saying anything else. He's an evil man.
Or...and hear me out on this...you could stop looking to fictional characters to justify being nice to people.
That's the problem with fictional characters, anyone can make them say anything they want and there's no ground to tell them they are wrong.
Try reality instead.
It looks like the OP shut down the thread.
It wasn’t clear you were agreeing with me. But thank you for the clarification.
I don’t address justification of slurs.
How is it *not*? The derivation of a slur doesn’t make it not a slur.
Then make that clear. You replied to someone replying to me. The implication is that you are referring to me.
Your point was a slur and does not stand. You can make other points that are valid, but they will not erase the slur.
What “points”? Can you address something I’ve actually said, or do you just have ad homs.
Then refer to them as such. Not with a slur.
“Race-hustling grift”?
Well, a good step would be to not refer to them with slurs.
SERVE
Respecting fallen troops is “stupid shit”?
Good to know where you stand.
Don't use "muppet" as a derogatory.