Liebe Medien, ich kann die Schlagzeile "Keine Einigung zwischen USA und Dänemark" nicht mehr sehen. Wenn ein Bewaffneter eine Bank stürmt, titelt ihr doch auch nicht: "Räuber und Kassiererin finden keinen Konsens über Geldübergabe." Hört auf, imperiale Aggression als normale Diplomatie zu framen.

Don't forget Snider's!

I agree that Mallet >> Gensim, but VI can also work well. It's just more finicky, and Gensim's implementation doesn't do the things that Mallet does to optimize hyperparameters. So just like we shouldn't let LDA get a bad rap because of Gensim, we shouldn't let VI get a bad rap because of Gensim.

I'm so ahead of the curve on AI, I've been using this strategy for a decade.

Um, actually, that's a Diaeresis:

www.frathwiki.com/Diaeresis_an...

I believe the planet Diaeresis is also the planet where Reva Sevander kidnapped Leia until she was rescued by Obi-Wan.

YouTube video by Hörspiel Teutone Der Meister des jüngsten Tages - Krimi Hörspiel - Leo Perutz

Audio book?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgkf...

I think you mean: Terror has spread. Even in The Loop, hundreds run from gunshots. Traffic has ground to a halt. Unable to do anything to prevent the stampede, hundreds scream from the sidewalks. "Police" stand by, doing nothing.

We had come at it more from the position of trying to use as few dev examples as possible (to keep them secret). I.e., use the best items you could and every model uses the exact same. But it makes sense to use the adaptive testing scenario if you don't mind potentially exposing more dev.

Link to paper since I ran out of room:

users.umiacs.umd.edu/~ying/docs/2...

In 2021, we proposed using IRT to find bad examples and to create more targeted leaderboards (Evaluation
Examples Are Not Equally Informative: How Should That Change NLP Leaderboards?).

From my reading, the big difference seems to be that they're also using the agent's skill, which is super cool!

We also found that it's helpful for improving uncertainty estimation of models:

arxiv.org/abs/2205.12507

If it said that 1990 was "about 10 years ago", I would say that it has reached tenured faculty-level intelligence.

Today's the deadline to apply for an AI-specific teaching track position at UMD:

umd.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/UMCP/job/Uni...

Please join us!

A couple of weeks ago I left my family behind at a cable car station to finish climbing to the peak of a mountain because they were too scared to continue. When I reached the top, my phone gave a notification: new podcasts available for download. Apparently LMU has an observatory on Wendelstein.

Do you mean salary, physical facilities, work environment, or funding ecosystem?

At the risk of picking out one of my favorite children, this was the paper with our best traditional video of this cycle (thanks to Jon May for playing along):

t.co/QQlgwzo6jf
t.co/2G6kwAAPMy

Joy Wongkamjan on X: "Our paper CTRL-D is accepted to ACL Findings and will be presented at ACL 2025! 🗓️Poster session: 18:00–19:30 (Level 0 Exhibit Halls X4/X5) I’m sad I can’t be there, but Jordan (@boydgraber) will! You’ll enjoy learning about CTRL-D from him. Now… what is CTRL-D? 🔍 https://t.co/ucIPZRHBF1" / X Our paper CTRL-D is accepted to ACL Findings and will be presented at ACL 2025! 🗓️Poster session: 18:00–19:30 (Level 0 Exhibit Halls X4/X5) I’m sad I can’t be there, but Jordan (@boydgraber) will! You’ll enjoy learning about CTRL-D from him. Now… what is CTRL-D? 🔍 https://t.co/ucIPZRHBF1

Finally, this evening I'll be standing in for
@wwongkamjan.bsky.social
at the Findings poster (18:00, Hall X4/X5): Should I Trust You? Detecting Deception in Negotiations using Counterfactual RL

x.com/joywwong/sta...

t.co/j3Iibs9hEn
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJKd...

Yoo Yeon Sung@ACL2025 on X: "I’ll be presenting this work in Room 1.62 today! If you're curious about how calibration errors in LLMs can be measured through human calibration, come find me and @enfleisig! 📍Oral Session 3 - HC: Human-centered NLP 📅Monday, July 28@ 2PM" / X I’ll be presenting this work in Room 1.62 today! If you're curious about how calibration errors in LLMs can be measured through human calibration, come find me and @enfleisig! 📍Oral Session 3 - HC: Human-centered NLP 📅Monday, July 28@ 2PM

In the second oral paper (14:22 PM, Room 1.62),
@yysung.bsky.social is presenting: GRACE: A Granular Benchmark for Evaluating Model Calibration against Human Calibration

x.com/YooYeonSung1...

(Short version: quiz bowl, a dumb trivia game, shows humans' calibration > LLMs'.)

t.co/LagmrMjVgi
t.co/aGM7LC2m0q

Nishant is ill-prepared for ACL2025 on X: "While personalization is great, it's not perfect. We found our strategy could easily let users jailbreak the model 😭 With some extra safeguards (e.g. refusal training), we think inferred personas could become a promising way to boost personalization in post-training recipes! 🧑‍🍳 https://t.co/Fpu1Bl34fI" / X While personalization is great, it's not perfect. We found our strategy could easily let users jailbreak the model 😭 With some extra safeguards (e.g. refusal training), we think inferred personas could become a promising way to boost personalization in post-training recipes! 🧑‍🍳 https://t.co/Fpu1Bl34fI

In the first poster session (11AM Monday, Hall X4/X5),
@nbalepur.bsky.social is presenting: Whose Boat Does it Float? Improving Personalization in Preference Tuning via Inferred User Personas

x.com/NishantBalep...

My students and I are presenting three papers on Monday at #ACL2025 and this thread will recap them (including their videos).

The precursor to this paper "The Incoherence of Coherence" had our most-watched paper video ever, so I thought we had to surpass it somehow ... so we decided to do a song parody (of Roxanne, obviously):

youtu.be/87OBxEM8a9E

Which makes this:
users.umiacs.umd.edu/~ying/docs/n...

"The Hobbit"

2025 QANTA Player Signup Sign up for the human competition for our 2025 QANTA event. More information: https://sites.google.com/view/qanta/2025-competition/2025-human-teams

And you can signup for online mirror (June 21, 12:00 EST) here:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

[Signup deadline: June 18 Anywhere on Earth]

QANTA Project - 2025 Human Teams How this Works It's always difficult to try something new, but we think this will be fun! Short Version: You'll play multiple rounds of tossup-bonus quiz bowl with computer teammates. The computer ca...

If this sounds like fun, we have more information on the setup here:
sites.google.com/view/qanta/2...

There are more reflections here:
hsquizbowl.org/forums/viewt...

Sara’s Crias went 4-2 to win the tournament (and $150 dollars). Noah Sheidlower’s music packet was the most difficult for computers, and Jame Carlson’s Spatial Reasoning was the fan favorite. We’ll announce writer and computer prizes after our online mirror. (And also post the packets.)

Human-Computer AI Collaborative Tournament Gameplay

We had our first human–computer cooperative AI tournament at the UMD. Key takeaways: 1) computers are getting better at trivia 2) they still suck at calibration 3) our teaming mechanic kept the games competitive and mostly fun (at least that’s what the players said).

QANTA Project - 2025 Human Teams How this Works It's always difficult to try something new, but we think this will be fun! Short Version: You'll play multiple rounds of tossup-bonus quiz bowl with computer teammates. The computer ca...

And get more information here:
sites.google.com/view/qanta/2...