Important paper from @anderskjelsrud.bsky.social and Sahar!
21.06.2025 08:35 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0@anderskjelsrud.bsky.social
Economics professor, Oslo Metropolitan University https://sites.google.com/site/anderskjelsrud/home
Important paper from @anderskjelsrud.bsky.social and Sahar!
21.06.2025 08:35 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Female PhD students (in economics) benefit tremendously from having female faculty around.
When female professors go on leave, it decreases third-year female PhD studentsβ likelihood of publishing & securing academic positions.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Kult, Askill! Gratulerer.
19.06.2025 21:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Update: We submitted the comment to the Journal of Population Economics, and today we got a desk reject with this motivation. However, we do not know their conclusion about the main results and why the paper was not retracted. Clearly, they do not hold. 1/4
15.05.2025 17:41 β π 84 π 33 π¬ 6 π 10π¨ REPLICATION REPORT UPDATE: One year ago, a tweet by John Holbein alerted me, @ollefolke.bsky.social, and @jopieboy.bsky.social to a paper with a shocking result about Swedenβs law criminalizing the purchase of sex.π§΅
09.05.2025 09:29 β π 389 π 199 π¬ 7 π 30π¨Β New #EconHistory research alert!
Our paper βStrikesΒ &Β Machines: Investment decisions in interβwar Norwayβ conditionally accepted in JournalΒ ofΒ EconomicΒ History ask
"What did strike threats really do to technology?"
π 1/6
#GDRI_rep Update 6: Some of the authors have responded to our report on "Raising Health Awareness in Rural Communities" @ The Review of Economics and Statistics. Authors received our report Feb 6. A short π§΅
25.03.2025 12:05 β π 17 π 6 π¬ 1 π 2This gem is hidden in the response to the response. ββ¦within a few hours and under extreme time pressure 11,843 households were visited and 22,686 respondents interviewed (two spouses in each household).β Indeed hard to believe π«
15.03.2025 09:37 β π 20 π 10 π¬ 1 π 2In a new @i4replication.bsky.social report we replicate Islam (2019). Main issue: the randomized controlled trial was not randomized. And many other things on top of that. See full report for details. (w/ @carlbonander.bsky.social, @nikljako.bsky.social, @flxhlzmstr.bsky.social, Bensch & Brodeur)
11.03.2025 18:56 β π 24 π 9 π¬ 2 π 1#GDRI_rep Update 4: We have a new report. We reproduced the paper entitled "Parentβteacher meetings and student outcomes" by Islam @ European Economic Review. See below for links to report and author's response.
11.03.2025 17:12 β π 20 π 15 π¬ 1 π 3#GDRI_rep Update 2: I4R sent a report to the original authors for the PLOS One article "βFood insecurity and mental health of women during COVID-19: Evidence from a developing country". All authors have now emailed PLOS One to withdraw their names. osf.io/7tzek/
03.03.2025 18:40 β π 10 π 9 π¬ 1 π 4#GDRI_rep Update 1: I4R are now reproducing all published papers that use data from GDRI, or are closely related in other ways. Here is a first update on our work. π§΅
03.03.2025 01:48 β π 27 π 20 π¬ 1 π 4Opprop! Vi er 47 samfunnsΓΈkonomer som tar til orde for en kraftig ΓΈkning av Norges stΓΈtte til Ukraina.
www.aftenposten.no/meninger/deb...
There is still time to submit one of your papers to NCDE!
24.02.2025 14:49 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 02nd report reproduces βRaising Health Awareness in Rural Communities: A Randomized Experiment in Bangladesh and India'' by Siddique et al. Review of Economics and Statistics. Authors received our report Feb 6. See same statements from some of the authors and full report here: osf.io/c3k6f/
24.02.2025 01:55 β π 14 π 3 π¬ 1 π 1π Good news for researchers working with Swedish register data and who want their research to be reproducible π If you include in your ethics application/research plan that replication may be part of the project, then external replicators (e.g. data editors) can be given access to the data!
19.02.2025 19:49 β π 60 π 16 π¬ 2 π 2Abel: I am writing in my capacity as Chair of I4R. Last year, I was contacted by a researcher that alerted me of potential scientific misconduct in a set of papers all using data from a specific NGO.π§΅
19.02.2025 03:10 β π 49 π 22 π¬ 1 π 10Reminder to send your papers to the Nordic Conference in Development Econ. Oslo is beautiful in summertime, we will swim in the fjord! (and talk research of course) #econsky
17.02.2025 12:23 β π 20 π 12 π¬ 1 π 0Actually, Sahar presented some of your results during our Annual Lecture on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. And the video is available online here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ44...
And by the way, you have super interesting results!
Thanks! strange, it works on my Chrome. You can also find the paper here: sites.google.com/site/andersk...
11.01.2025 16:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Come to Oslo for the 23rd Nordic Conference in Development Economics! June 17β18, 2025.
Keynotes: Eliana La Ferrara (Harvard Kennedy School) Kalle Moene (University of Oslo).
No conference feeβjust bring your passion for research! Submission deadline: Feb 28, 2025.
Link below:
π’ Call for papers π’
Submit your paper to the Nordic Conference in Development Economics
Where and when: Oslo, June 17-18
Submission deadline: Feb 28
Keynotes: Eliana la Ferrara and Kalle Moene
www.oslomet.no/en/about/eve...
Jepp, det kan kanskje virke sΓ₯nn.
08.01.2025 20:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you! And thanks for sharing- I will definitely take a look.
07.01.2025 20:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Want more? Read the full paper here:
github.com/parsahar/par...
How does it all matter?
Our findings underscore the importance of same-gender mentorship in male-dominated fields like Econ. A counterfactual exercise suggests that hiring one extra female prof at each of the top-50 schools would close 1/3 of the gender gap among ass profs at the top-25 schools.
To support this interpretation, we β among other things β provide evidence of gender homophily in advisor-advisee relationships. Even controlling for department-year-field fixed effects, we find that female students are 50% more likely to have a female advisor compared to male students.
07.01.2025 16:37 β π 8 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0What explains these results?
We argue that the effects are connected to gender homophily in professional and social networks. The absence of female mentors hinders the development and placement of female students, while indirectly benefiting male students (perhaps through reduced competition).
Still, placements are not of equal βquality". Females are missing from the top-ranked institutions, while males fill lower ranked positions.
07.01.2025 16:36 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 03. For male students, we find what looks like a zero-sum game: affected males publish more and are more likely to stay in academia.
07.01.2025 16:36 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0