Further unraveling: we'll see, I'm not that optimistic. I would have preferred it if the US had unilaterally withdrawn from the WTO. I agree on incidence.
29.07.2025 15:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@johannesmboehm.bsky.social
Professor of Economics, Geneva Graduate Institute & CEPR. Growth, Trade, Productivity, Organization, Environment, South Asia. https://jmboehm.github.io/
Further unraveling: we'll see, I'm not that optimistic. I would have preferred it if the US had unilaterally withdrawn from the WTO. I agree on incidence.
29.07.2025 15:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes, that's exactly what I'm worried about (but it will take 5-10y to evaluate). The EU is effectively showing the middle finger to MFN.
29.07.2025 07:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But at the price of sacrificing the world trading system...
28.07.2025 21:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If this is accurate, then unless the EU eliminates all tariffs on industrial imports from all its WTO partners, it will be joining Trump in destroying the international trade rules that have applied since WW2. The difference being that while Trump hates the rule-based order the EU claims to value it
28.07.2025 20:44 β π 36 π 17 π¬ 7 π 2Today's trade deal between the US and the EU -- if as reported in the press, and if independent from other agreements -- is a massive mistake on the EU's side. Instead it should have called Trump's bluff. Trump would not have imposed 30% on EU imports for long.
27.07.2025 20:26 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Contracts as reference points"?
13.07.2025 12:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Does that mean that the 'mistake' was merely to use this particular justification, and if they find a somewhat less creative justification, there is little that the courts would do to stop tariffs?
29.05.2025 11:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thank you βͺto @peterfrankopan.bsky.socialβ¬ for discussing our paper on his terrific substack blog: peterfrankopan.substack.com/p/coins-in-t...
20.05.2025 19:27 β π 14 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0The real Austrian response is "depends on who's asking" :)
13.05.2025 14:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Whenever you need a model/estimator that isn't already available in 'canned' form (i.e. whenever you need to write the optimization problem yourself). If you stick with OLS/IV/PPML/logit/probit your're usually fine w/ R or stata.
29.04.2025 18:30 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0They can't; the Calvo fairy didn't let them today
28.04.2025 15:50 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Are you a PhD student working on topics related to globalization? Come hang out with us at Dartmouth for a term as a Globalization Ph.D. Fellow! We're now accepting applications for the 2025-2026 academic year:
globalization.dartmouth.edu/programs/glo...
Thank you! The CEPR discussion paper version is gated; here's the ungated (and up-to-date) draft: jmboehm.github.io/coins.pdf
18.04.2025 17:33 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Trade and the End of Antiquity featured in today's Chartbook Top Link.
18.04.2025 17:03 β π 81 π 21 π¬ 7 π 3Call for papers: @theigc.bsky.social/@yaleegc.bsky.social conference on Firms/Trade/Development, Oct. 24-25, 2025.
The leading conference in the firms & development space!
Early decision deadline (to accommodate visa processing): May 30.
General submission deadline: July 18.
On 14th April, as part of a first of a series of events, nine Institute professors gave briefings, tying their expertise to the the first 100 days of Donald Trumpβs second presidency and its global implications.
Watch the recording now, in case you missed it
π
shorturl.at/xnGla
That document is very unclear about this
10.04.2025 11:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There is still a time to apply for our Master in International Economics
Third and final deadline on April 15
@gvagrad.bsky.social @dominic-rohner.bsky.social @johannesmboehm.bsky.social
Please repost
Dekle, Eaton, Kortum (2007): "We incorporate imbalances into a quantitative model of bilateral trade, calculating how relative factor costs and welfare would change if current accounts were all balanced." US welfare declines 6%.
pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/...
Just such beautiful variation though
02.04.2025 22:53 β π 53 π 18 π¬ 4 π 181/ NEW RESEARCH: Our study reveals 46% of pesticides embedded in EU agricultural consumption originate from imports, despite imports constituting only 17% of consumption. This includes substances prohibited in the EU. This regulatory gap fuels leakage effects and hurts EU competitiveness π§΅
27.03.2025 07:31 β π 18 π 12 π¬ 2 π 0The research group at the Workd Bank is doing an off-cycle hire for a trade economist worldbankgroup.csod.com/ux/ats/caree...
28.03.2025 16:48 β π 18 π 24 π¬ 1 π 1I gave a talk in Edinburgh a few weeks ago and had a great time. They have a fantastic group.
21.03.2025 20:27 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Europe is about to commit its greatest strategic mistake. on.ft.com/4bVGZZ9
21.03.2025 15:53 β π 48 π 22 π¬ 5 π 11On Europe as a destination for US-based scientists: it's a great place to live and work. Salaries aren't as high as US ones, but for seniors they're fine and we live well. (More could be done for juniors in some states.) We get European benefits. And the ERC offers great support for top researchers.
14.03.2025 12:47 β π 74 π 19 π¬ 5 π 2Congratulations!!
13.03.2025 14:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not in a neoclassical/ricardian world, I guess. To be clear, I wasn't advocating this policy, it might just be a perspective that's consistent with some of Trump's statements.
10.03.2025 19:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's hard to know how much he really cares about that though (as with pretty much everything else he's been saying)
10.03.2025 14:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Another (charitable) interpretation is that they're trying to create so much uncertainty about tariffs that it ends up working like a tariff, but without the retaliation. (That would be consistent with Trump viewing import tariffs as "good for America" and the retaliation as "bad for America")
10.03.2025 14:03 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0And also one of the best paper titles in the history of IO ("how to get away with merger")
07.03.2025 18:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0