Oddly, it does.
No, it’s worse that we’re still not addressing violence against women and girls in any useful way. In fact we’re going in the other direction. Ask an Epstein victim how effective the laws are.
It implies the same as it does for those of us, in or out of the service, who are Christian but not Christian Nationalists. They’re aiming at everyone.
Is this in the same category of how many times a day men think about Rome? I can’t say this is a thing that’s ever crossed my mind. The nearest source of antivenin when hiking? Yes. But not anti-python measures.
“They’ll be home for Christmas” has never worked out that way.
Things are only illegal if laws against them are enforced. Rape of all kinds is not a thing we collectively choose to investigate, charge, or punish.
Utter moral cowardice
That slightly flomp ear makes me swoon every time.
This needs to be used to teach the definition of “upstaged.” Chef’s kiss.
When palliative care comes to see you, one of them will be a chaplain.
Narrator: Trump has never tried to be a unifier.
Well that was predictable.
This is bizarre in a clinical sense, and you need to get help for whoever thought of it and anyone who approved it.
He knows what consent is after all.
The Super Bowl halftime show being in Spanish is an outrage, but the mass should be said in Latin.
You mean scientists.
That headline is inexcusable and you know it.
Eh, I don’t care about this one. We haven’t found a thing that works. There’s no reason not to try this. Fiction and feelings is what convinced them not to vax their kids in the first place. It may not work, but it’s not evil.
Who reads the Atlantic though? Probably not lots of evangelical fundamentalists.
A third? Really? You appear to have a lot of feelings and no information. I’ve never lived anywhere where a third of people even know anything about housing policy, let alone spend money on it. Neither have you, and this neighborhood isn’t that place either.
Feel free to continue to “lose your mind” about an insignificant post written by someone’s social media staffer.
How does one social media post about inflation mean she’s failing to meet the moment?
Then stick to the substance of those.
I expect she’s discussed that. If you look I’d bet actual money that you’ll find it. A social media post about affordability she almost certainly didn’t write herself certainly doesn’t mean she hasn’t. I don’t understand the outrage.
What is it that you want her to do about that? Say it’s bad? She has.
Okay, but when I hear that I don’t think it means she expects there to be one, I think she means that’s what ought to happen.
You know she’s said a lot about ICE too, right? I don’t know enough about her to know what kind of governor she’d be, but a cheesy post about inflation she probably didn’t write seems like a weird thing to hate on.
What’s funny is pretending that if you say a thing it means you’ve never said anything else.
She’s talked about ICE quite a bit. Pretending that ever discussing anything else means she hasn’t is odd.
We can talk about more than one thing at a time. You must know she’s said plenty about ICE.
