Pour one out for the UN Charter.
22.06.2025 09:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@rlingur.bsky.social
Defense & Tech Policy consulting. Senior Visiting Fellow at IIA Univ. of Iceland. Former Facebook/Meta, Icelandic Diplo, SAIS Fellow, UN, NATO/ISAF, UNICEF. Oxon ABD on WWI tanks. “Basically a modern day viking”
Pour one out for the UN Charter.
22.06.2025 09:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not surprising in the least.
22.06.2025 09:08 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If he would go to a Federal Penitentiary that would be helpful..
18.06.2025 18:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Trump is the crisis
18.06.2025 15:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Russia continues to celebrate the Putin-Trump call. Today’s Russian papers: “Trump’s stance couldn’t be more advantageous to Moscow.” “Trump is our ideological partner.” Another paper tells European leaders: “Just breathe in the smell of the new world order.” #ReadingRussia
21.05.2025 08:16 — 👍 348 🔁 159 💬 20 📌 15Stick to economics 😘
07.05.2025 18:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also risky for him
01.05.2025 19:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0How about this bathroom art at Arlington restaurant in London 😉
23.04.2025 20:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The US “peace plan” is a capitulation that rubbishes the UN Charter. Europe has to reject this American collusion with Russia. Full stop.
23.04.2025 19:53 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Bananas
21.04.2025 19:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Tomorrow marks 250 years since the "shot heard round the world" as Emerson described it.
It was a good run, but this bold experiment might have run its course.
At least John Winthrop’s “city on a hill” is no more. No matter what. The way that idea has been broken it cannot be put together again.
Yeah, agree. China can win big here.
18.04.2025 13:28 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Was he there as himself or as Ron Vara?
14.04.2025 07:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree protectionist talk has increased, and there’s a fun debate to be had about how we have enabled China.
But your post reads as if its lending reason to what is a deeply irrational, uniquely stupid, Trumpian policy approach with no real understanding of economic impact (or theory).
Alignment on underlying challenges doesn’t mean policy alignment. Your sign is not very helpful 😉
14.04.2025 06:35 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0A billionare simp.
13.04.2025 21:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Rogue state
13.04.2025 15:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Iskander?
13.04.2025 15:03 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0FUNDSTRAT tonight:
“.. in the last few days, we have had many conversations with macro fund managers. .. A few have quietly wondered if the President might be insane.”
Happy with Pistorius!
09.04.2025 19:08 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Troismanuel
09.04.2025 10:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You had a decent innings… 250 years
07.04.2025 21:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0💯
07.04.2025 13:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Careful what you wish for 🙃
07.04.2025 12:54 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I'd prefer pretty much anyone
07.04.2025 11:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“for what **** so iPhones can be nine thousand dollars?”
youtu.be/inlDT62oGy8?...
Surprise that the failed businessman doesn’t understand fiscal and trade policy.
06.04.2025 23:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0and demolishing US soft power, but tbf he’s not the only one working on that…
04.04.2025 14:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0