Nature is taking a good step forward.
All journals should publish all peer reviews.
Here's why:
the-scientist.com/opinion-we-m...
blog.slavovlab.net/2023/04/15/p...
Nature is taking a good step forward.
All journals should publish all peer reviews.
Here's why:
the-scientist.com/opinion-we-m...
blog.slavovlab.net/2023/04/15/p...
🔥 How do you think reviews will evolve?
04.09.2025 09:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
If you want to read more on the history of review writing, the rise of LLMs, how expert researchers still play a role, the foreseeable cultural shift, and how this might destabilize the entire publishing ecosystem, then have a read on the full article:
www.embopress.org/doi/full/10....
In EMBO ‘Science & Society’ I show that today, reviews make up one-fifth (!) of all publications - do we need them all?
👉 Researchers spend months summarizing articles. Now if LLMs promise to generate coherent syntheses from thousands of papers in seconds: why should humans keep writing them?
For centuries, distilling existing knowledge has been the scaffolding of science: From Hippocrates, to Galen, and eventually the explosion of systematic reviews that shaped evidence-based medicine.
#ScientificPublishing#ResearchIntegrity #AI #LLM #FutureOfWork
10 more days to apply!
employment.ku.dk/faculty/?sho...
🚨 **We’re hiring a #postdoc in Bioinformatics/Data Science/ML!** 🚨
🔍 PhD required (bioinformatics, ML, data science, etc.)
🛠️ Python/R, protein models, big data handling
📍 Copenhagen | Start: May 2025
Apply by March 5, 2025! More details here: [link](employment.ku.dk/faculty?show...)