This study was powered by #CatBoost, a machine learning model whose name was too perfect to pass up 🐱
Paper also available here: www.herbert-chang.com/researchport...
@herbertchang.bsky.social
Assistant Professor of Quantitative Social Science @Dartmouth // I study how AI & algorithms reshape human networks // Prev. @USCAnnenberg //
This study was powered by #CatBoost, a machine learning model whose name was too perfect to pass up 🐱
Paper also available here: www.herbert-chang.com/researchport...
💵 Cat owners > Dog owners in total donations.
One reason: the urban–rural divide—cats are more common in high-cost-of-living cities, where donation levels are higher overall.
💵 Cat owners donate more frequently and to a wider variety of causes. This may be linked to higher psychological openness and neuroticism often associated with cat people.
26.09.2025 14:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0💵 Non-pet owners give the most money overall—but they give less frequently and to fewer causes.
26.09.2025 14:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 Alert! Are you a #dog person or a #cat person? Since the dawn of time, we have debated their superiority… but your answer reveals how you give to charity.
I analyzed 787M donations ($69B) across 10 years. A thread 🧵
Paper: www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/...
The unavoidable has happened: here's a study on pet ownership and donation behavior. Can you DAG this?
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927936.2025.2544418
Grateful for my co-authors (and mentors as this was a dissertation chapter) James Druckman, @emilioferrara.bsky.social, and @robbwiller.bsky.social
#SocialMedia #Politics #ComputationalSocialScience #PNASNexus #RetweetAsymmetry
3/ Our analysis shows that
🔹 Liberals = more diverse, more toxic info environments
🔹 Conservatives = more filtered, less cross-cutting exposure
These results show that blanket, one-size-fits-all content moderation could have unintended ideological effects.
2/ Liberals also amplify toxic tweets—especially when Democrats criticize Republicans. However, when Conservatives avoid toxic content, when sourced from Democrats.
08.08.2025 15:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 01/ Liberals retweet both Democrat and Republican lawmakers—across many issues.
Conservatives, by contrast, mostly share Republican-owned content.
📢 Our new paper is out in PNAS Nexus!
We analyzed 13M users, 1.3M congressional tweets, and 3.5B tweets of media diet to uncover how liberals and conservatives share political content differently. 🧵
Full paper: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Special shout out to my two brilliant collaborators @ebharrington.bsky.social and Dan Rockmore.
17.07.2025 14:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Huh? Yes: elites in well-governed countries (Scandinavia, Singapore, etc.) also offshore wealth.
Why? To dodge high taxes, strict enforcement, or just to stay under the radar.
Secrecy is essentially a tool for both fear of authoritarianism and transparency.
Some highlights from the data. Corrupt countries or where asset confiscation is likely, elites use diversification.
And paradoxically: strong democracies = some form of identity concealment.
Elites don’t just stash money in tax havens—they strategically choose how and where to hide it.
We find three main “secrecy strategies”:
1. Diversify assets across jurisdictions
2. Conceal identity (nominees, bearer shares)
3. Use blacklisted havens despite stigma
We analyzed 6.9TB of leaked offshore data (Panama, Paradise, Pandora Papers) from the @icij.org and combined that with established Rule of Law indices from the World Justice Project.
17.07.2025 14:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What conditions foster the use of offshore finance?
Excited to share our work on how elites across 65 countries use the offshore financial system to keep their assets hidden.
Coverage: home.dartmouth.edu/news/2025/07...
Paper Link: doi.org/10.1371/jour...
Incredibly proud to be part of @mingyuezha.bsky.social top paper at #ica25!
If you’re interested in using game theory to quantify collaboration dynamics, she’ll be presenting this at #Cysoc #ICWSM in Copenhagen tomorrow, please swing by!
Full paper: lnkd.in/gegvA4g7
Excited to be at #MPSA for the first time! Will be presenting two papers:
Use of AI generated images in the 2024 US Presidential Election. (LaSalle 3, 7th floor, 11:40-1:10 PM Th)
Then, misinformation and conjoint analysis of the 2024 Taiwanese elections on Friday.
Please stop by! #mpsa2025
🚨 Call for Papers 🚨
We are organizing a Special Issue on "Risks and Unintended Harms of Generative AI Systems" at ACM TIST!
More details here: dl.acm.org/journal/tist...
Deadline: May 31, 2025 (review on a rolling basis)
#LLM #misinformation #disinformation #AI #genAI
Thrilled to be on Forbes Under 30 for Science!
(Still getting used to Bluesky 🥳 😅 )
Congrats to @herbertchang.bsky.social, assistant professor of quantitative social science and Dartmouth 2018 alum, who is featured in the 2024 #ForbesUnder30 in Science list! 🎉 Via @Forbes ⤵️ bit.ly/40WgZHG
28.11.2023 15:20 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Dartmouth professor @herbertchang.bsky.social led a study into how pop culture icons’ social media messages influenced mask-wearing habits during the pandemic, via Vermont Public ⤵️
19.10.2023 20:04 — 👍 11 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0🎉🎉 Let me use my first post here to announce that my first dissertation paper has been accepted to the Annals of the AAG. Pre-print forthcoming to my website, and hopefully published by AAG soon! 🎉🎉
02.10.2023 20:38 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0final week to apply to the Quantitative Social Science opening at dartmouth!
apply.interfolio.com/130125
I'll be presenting our new paper "Subscriptions and External Links Help Drive Resentful Users to Alternative and Extremist YouTube Videos" (science.org/doi/10.1126/...) in the OSoMe Awesome Speakers series on Zoom Wed. at 12 PM ET
Join us! Registration here iu.zoom.us/meeting/regi...
Reflections from my UW colleague @mikecaulfield.bsky.social: “Anecdotal evidence that X is failing this stress test is plentiful. Go on the platform, do a search on Israel or Gaza — you don’t have to scroll very far to find dubious or debunked information.” www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
09.10.2023 03:49 — 👍 279 🔁 109 💬 6 📌 6Researchers of online misinformation (and related topics) aren’t “buckling” to politically-motivated attacks. Our critical work to understand and address online deception and manipulation continues. But only with the support of our colleagues and institutions. www.seattletimes.com/opinion/uw-m...
07.10.2023 19:02 — 👍 375 🔁 137 💬 5 📌 4In our new paper out today at Trends in Cognitive Science, @lisik.bsky.social and I argue that social interaction perception is a visual process–computed by the visual system. (1/3)
tinyurl.com/nhh2dhx
#PsychSciSky #CogSci #CogPsyc #compneuro