Thanks.
I understand it is SBL 2023.
Have not seen a url.
Any help appreciated!
@purebible.bsky.social
believer https://purebibleforum.com/index.php specialty research Authorized Version, the pure word of God Jehovah for Tetragram, yahweh == jupiter 1 John 5:7 Sinaiticus, Mt. Athos, 1840s, Constantine Simonides scribe PureBible group, Facebook no-virus
Thanks.
I understand it is SBL 2023.
Have not seen a url.
Any help appreciated!
Hi Greg,
Neat!
Do you know if there is any transcript or audio available on the Constantine Simonides talk?
(The evidence is strong that he actually was part of the Codex Sinaiticus production at Mt. Athos c. 1839-1840.)
Thanks!
Steven
Hi Andrew,
Neat!
Do you know if there is any transcript or audio available?
Thanks!
Steven
Hi Coffee,
3 columns - so it is likely Codex Vaticanus.
Sinaiticus probably goes all the way back to Mt. Athos, c. 1840.
Hi Max,
3 columns - so it is likely Codex Vaticanus.
Sinaiticus probably goes all the way back to Mt. Athos, c. 1840. :)
Also the manuscript lacked monk handling grime.
So the Russians saw the Brits as marks, and liked the exorbitant selling price. They carried it in a shabby wooden box to London
The whole story has many humorous elements
After 2009 the Leipzig 1844 pages could be compared to 1859 St. Petersburg.
Hi Emmanuel,
True, here is the back-story.
Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov (1854-1946), Honorary Member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, had examined the manuscript and in a 1914 book he pointed out that the condition of the manuscript was far too flexible and pristine to be ancient.
Steven
Your welcome.
And I believe that savvy historians can study the forgery/replica dynamic with far more insight than those on the inside, like textual critics.
Forests and trees, circularity, presuppositions, consensus all work to skew.
Hi Jona,
And a book with a checkered history.
The condition of the parchment bewrays the theory of 1650 years old.
The difference in the colouring of the 1844 Leipzig and the 1859 St. Petersburg (to London) pages points to artificial colouring.
The colouring was accused in 1863 by Simonides.
Any time I see the 34 felony absurdity I know the post is worthless,
18.08.2025 02:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Stephen Colbert lost any relevance and credibility in one hyphenated word.
"Vax-Scene"
Hi Sammie,
Were you encouraging the Amish on your caseload to receive the covid jabs?
Thank you pharma-$$$ bot.
23.06.2025 12:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There is Simonides and Hodgkin correspondence at the British Library that really needs examination, some of it has to do with the efforts to show the Sinaiticus history, including the fascinating lithographed Autographa/Spoudaion Kallinikos material given as 1853/1854 published in Odessa and Moscow.
20.06.2025 11:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hi Christoph,
Updated URL
07.02.1859: Konstantin von Tischendorf entdeckt die Γ€lteste erhaltene Bibelhandschrift der Welt
www1.wdr.de/radio/wdr5/s...
Thanks, JD.
The new cabal that supports mutilation of children by pseudo-professional $$$-grubbing pressure is not really capable of discussion, reason, understanding.
Wonderful SCOTUS decision.
Thank you for emphasizing how the Pfizer thugs can operate.
And your cowardice.
Discovery!
What a wonderful legal tool to help get the Pfizer fools.
Wonderful job!
Naomi Wolf is especially a hero to young woman who she warned about the jab dangers.
It is humorous and sad watching the Bluesky-ites missing the elephant in the living room, woman's fertility, miscarriages, etc.
Many of us had one or two as children back in the 1950s, we did not know any better, after that ...
Zero, zilch, nada.
It is true that Amish children's health is far better than the norm, and jab resistance is a major reason.
19.05.2025 05:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"rampant viral replication"
- one of the great comedy scientific myths, one great lacuna in the pseudo-science of virology. Dead or inactive "viruses" entering cells and hijacking cell functions for replication never had a scientific base, accepted only by ossified osmosis and ongoing circularity.
The Bluesky crew does not seem interested in the reproductive harm and the miscarriages that were caused by the jabs (focus on Pfizer) or the spectacularly effective efforts of the "right-leaning" Naomi Wolf that has made her a true hero this decade - especially to young woman.
18.05.2025 16:18 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Naomi Wolf's most important work in the last years of "covid" has been exposing Pfizer malfeasance and deception in their jab trials and the effects on woman's reproductive cycles & miscarriages.
Critics shilling for Pfizer? Basically zero mention on Bluesky. To many women, Naomi Wolf is a hero.
The best info is in a paper by Federico Zuliani
Schede per la biografia di Costantino Simonidis, Β«Quaderni di storiaΒ», xcvi (2022), pp. 195-228.
S moved to Canada and Z discusses his work as a Journalist for the Brighton Observer up to 1862.
English Extract
www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?th...
18F looks like a classic boondoggle, over a decade to get their IRS filing software partially running, 3 offices and remotes everywhere, the ASF funding often going down the drain.
"elite" in spending $$$
Note that Marc Veldhoen, the apparent expert on virus history, does not like being asked about the amazing cell hijacking theory, so he goes to good old:
BLOCK!
Are there any other virus defenders who want to try to come up to speed, now that Marc has conceded the glaring scientific lacuna?
Marc Veldhoen
"One virus becomes thousands"
So what were the amazing original studies that showed that this multiplication of "viruses" occurred by hijacking cell functions for replication?
Was there lysis, infection, transmission?
"moment viruses were discovered"
Quite vague, how about a date?
Marc, consider the possibility that you have been duped, led down a primrose path. The virus myth is pushed by pharma-$$$ for the ultra-lucrative jabs!
Stefan Lanka broke out of the virus fantasy, and the replication hijacking nonsense was a major piece of the puzzle.
Tabula rasa!
Real science.
Hi Marc,
Throw 100 circular papers against the wall, hope something sticks. No proof of the wild theory that dead/inactive "viruses" enter cells and hijack cell functions for replication.
Ironically, even you say that virology had no evidence for this wacky theory for 50+ years!
Anyone else?