Chatting with @anacabrera.bsky.social on MSNBC in a few minutes about the Trump administration quietly plotting the first step of its attack on birthright citizenship slate.com/news-and-pol...
05.08.2025 15:33 — 👍 104 🔁 53 💬 9 📌 6@mjsdc.bsky.social
Senior writer at Slate covering courts and the law. Co-host of the Amicus podcast. Dad to one toddler and several other animals.
Chatting with @anacabrera.bsky.social on MSNBC in a few minutes about the Trump administration quietly plotting the first step of its attack on birthright citizenship slate.com/news-and-pol...
05.08.2025 15:33 — 👍 104 🔁 53 💬 9 📌 6What are we thinking for a title? "If I Did It: Confessions of the Dobbs Leaker"? "Afraid of the Subway”?
I personally envision an unauthorized sequel to Uncle Bobby's Wedding in which Chloe converts to Catholicism then turns him straight: "Uncle Bobby's Conversion."
www.cnn.com/2025/08/04/p...
Conservative legal luminary Jack Goldsmith points out that Justice Barrett's opinion in the universal injunction case rests on an error: For the purposes of historical analysis, she looked at the wrong statute and got the relevant date wrong by nearly *a century.*
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Oh, and this one's also available on YouTube for those who prefer video! (Sorry you have to look at Emily Bove's face.) www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ztm...
04.08.2025 18:53 — 👍 66 🔁 17 💬 1 📌 1The Supreme Court punting a big Voting Rights Act case on the last day of the term was weird, until last week, when it became very clear that the justices did so because they want to use it to get rid of what remains of the Voting Rights Act
04.08.2025 17:01 — 👍 227 🔁 100 💬 11 📌 1I also had the immense honor of guest-hosting an episode of Strict Scrutiny with @leahlitman.bsky.social! There was simply too much legal news for one podcast last week! You can listen here: www.crooked.com/podcast/stac...
04.08.2025 17:09 — 👍 78 🔁 18 💬 2 📌 1And as Mark says, our convo is part of the most ambitious legal podcast cross over event in history! Here’s the Amicus episode that’s paired with this Strict Scrutiny! @mjsdc.bsky.social podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a...
04.08.2025 12:39 — 👍 56 🔁 7 💬 2 📌 0Interesting and timely. I broadly share Holding’s view that it’s way too early to abandon hope that the imperfect lower courts can hold the line against Trump and his Supreme Court majority.
04.08.2025 14:36 — 👍 35 🔁 14 💬 0 📌 1My New One at @slate.com on the Supreme Court Potentially Killing the Remaining Pillar of the Voting Rights Act: “The Supreme Court Just Signaled Something Deeply Disturbing About the Next Term” slate.com/news-and-pol...
04.08.2025 14:28 — 👍 499 🔁 240 💬 34 📌 31And for Plus: A fabulous and infuriating conversation with @leahlitman.bsky.social about Trump's Justice Department lying—a LOT—and actually getting caught. Plus: The first stage of Trump's attack on birthright citizenship is starting to become a reality. slate.com/podcasts/ami...
04.08.2025 14:19 — 👍 78 🔁 20 💬 3 📌 0This week on Amicus: A reason NOT to give up on the courts despite the horrific confirmation of Emil Bove. We look at three remarkable district court judges who refuse to give up on equal justice and use every ounce of their power to fight courageously for the rule of law. slate.com/podcasts/ami...
04.08.2025 14:17 — 👍 199 🔁 60 💬 7 📌 3CORDER LIST: 606 U.S.) FRIDAY, AUGUST 1, 2025 24-109 24-110 ORDER IN PENDING CASES LOUISIANA V. CALLAIS, PHILLIP, ET AL. ROBINSON, PRESS, ET AL. V. CALLAIS, PHILLIP, ET AL. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question raised on pages 36-38 of the Brief for Appellees: Whether the State's intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution. Supplemental briefs for appellants are due on or before Wednesday, August 27, 2025. Supplemental brief for appellees is due on or before Wednesday, September 17, 2025. Reply briefs are due on or before 2 p.m., Friday, October 3, 2025. The time to file amicus curiae briefs is as provided for by this Court's Rule 37.3. Word limits and cover colors for the briefs should correspond to the provisions of this Court's Rule 33.1(g) pertaining to briefs on the merits rather than to the provision pertaining to supplemental
😬The Supreme Court will consider whether the intentional creation of a majority-minority congressional district violates the 14th or 15th Amendments.
If the answer is yes, SCOTUS will effectively declare that what remains of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. This is very, very ominous.
So the government made it sound like it was facing significantly worse “harm”—if we’re defining harm as being unable to unlawfully purge civil servants from the federal workforce—and ran to the Supreme Court jumping up and down with these eye-popping numbers. And Judge Illston came back and said: Those numbers were obviously wrong. And the fact that they were wrong shows exactly why I am allowing this discovery, because you are not giving the whole truth. Exactly. I mean, the judge was vindicated. And this is part of a pattern of what the administration is doing with lower courts: It is trying to block them from uncovering the facts, dragging its feet, then waving its hands to create some uncertainty about the facts—all designed to obstruct lower courts’ ability to enforce the law against the administration.
Spoke with @leahlitman.bsky.social about ANOTHER federal judge calling out the Trump administration for lying to the Supreme Court, and where all this legal gaslighting could eventually lead us. slate.com/news-and-pol...
01.08.2025 18:17 — 👍 216 🔁 55 💬 2 📌 5Maryland Bookstore Donates Proceeds From GOP Senator’s Book Sales to Immigrant Charity People's Book says it encourages Dave McCormick to "buy additional books from us so we can give more of his massive piles of wealth to other worthy causes."
One of my favorite bookstores in the DC area, People's Book, revealed the Republican lobbyists who bought bulk orders of GOP Sen. McCormick's dumb new book from the store to goose sales numbers. Then it gave all the profits from the sale to an immigrant charity. www.washingtonian.com/2025/08/01/d...
01.08.2025 17:59 — 👍 317 🔁 72 💬 12 📌 6Under pressure from the White House, the Smithsonian censored an exhibit that mentioned Trump’s impeachments, now inaccurately suggesting to visitors that he was never impeached at all (let alone twice). www.washingtonpost.com/entertainmen...
31.07.2025 23:29 — 👍 326 🔁 163 💬 36 📌 31Crowd of people at Butterworth’s for Emil Bove’s confirmation party Photo: Alex Swoyer on Twitter
Bove in a suit gives remarks in front of American flag at Butterworth’s Photo credit: Mike Davis/Article 3 project on Twitter
Todd Blanche gives remarks at Butterworth’s. He’s wearing a suit and speaking into a microphone next to Bove Photo credit: Mike Davis/Article 3 project on Twitter
Drinks at the party included “A Bove & Beyond” Photo credit: Mike Davis/Article 3 project on Twitter
Last night, Emil Bove celebrated his confirmation as a federal appeals court judge at Butterworth’s, the MAGA hot spot in D.C.
The Article III Project hosted the party, with guests including Steve Bannon, Jack Posobiec, Judge Jeanine, Todd Blanche, Chad Mizelle, Ed Martin, and Jeffrey Clark.
Awww I love him! Thank you for sharing these beautiful photos!
31.07.2025 20:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The filing, which is not public, was submitted to the inspector general’s office in electronic form on May 2, and a longer, printed version that included documentary evidence was delivered on May 5, according to people familiar with the filing. The inspector general appears to have done nothing with the information for more than two months, and many in that office did not realize they even had the material until a day or two before the full Senate voted on Mr. Bove’s nomination. He was confirmed Tuesday by a razor-thin margin, 50 to 49. Last Friday, when the whistle-blower group went public about the filing’s existence, the inspector general’s office told lawmakers that it had no such complaint, according to people familiar with the case, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. The office only found the documents after lawyers for the whistle-blower presented electronic and FedEx delivery receipts for them. The implications of that inaction are potentially significant, given that Republicans have cast skepticism on another Justice Department whistle-blower, Erez Reuveni, describing his account as part of a politically timed effort by Democrats to scuttle a Trump nomination. That someone appears to have come forward about Mr. Bove’s conduct well before his nomination was known would undercut those claims. The complaint, according to people familiar with it, outlines a set of allegations that largely tracks with Mr. Reuveni’s account.
Oh boy.
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/u...
NEW: I spoke with a woman named Andrea about her experience being detained by ICE after calling the cops for help during a domestic violence incident.
She was recently postpartum, breastfeeding & put in an all-male facility. She was detained for 2.5 months.
After Emil Bove’s confirmation, I do not want to hear shit from conservative legal movement types about how they want “good constitutionalist judges who do law, not policy” or whatever ever again
31.07.2025 01:16 — 👍 668 🔁 107 💬 18 📌 7I fear some of you are misunderstanding my complaint ... I am not suggesting that flossing is unimportant, I am saying that dentists don't need to be harshly critical or rude to a patient whose flossing techniques do not satisfy their incredibly demanding standards! Be nice about it!
31.07.2025 13:39 — 👍 151 🔁 3 💬 16 📌 0Why must dentists always criticize me for not flossing well enough? I don't criticize you for not knowing enough about the Supreme Court or the assassination of James Garfield or my other areas of niche expertise. Can't we call it even and make this a judgment-free zone?
31.07.2025 13:20 — 👍 698 🔁 43 💬 50 📌 4😍😍😍He is SO gorgeous! What’s his name?
31.07.2025 12:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Brown's capitulation to the state is as great a threat to academic freedom in America as Columbia's cowardice. Anonymous student course evaluations have been potentially weaponized to punish speech that might anger students in the classroom. A serious chilling effect. www.brown.edu/sites/defaul...
31.07.2025 11:41 — 👍 216 🔁 74 💬 3 📌 0Correct
30.07.2025 21:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Josh Divine was one of the lawyers asking Matthew Kacsmaryk to ban the abortion pill. He just withdrew from the case … because Trump made him a judge. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
30.07.2025 21:19 — 👍 129 🔁 74 💬 7 📌 4The Trump administration has quietly released the first stage of its plan to revoke birthright citizenship from the children of immigrants. It uses dry legalese to conceal the barbaric reality of ICE agents in maternity wards and deportation flights for babies. slate.com/news-and-pol...
30.07.2025 21:17 — 👍 822 🔁 478 💬 32 📌 79Green parrot licking rainbow popsicle
To be a bird licking a rainbow popsicle on a hot July day
30.07.2025 19:54 — 👍 3717 🔁 314 💬 54 📌 17The ONLY REASON Trump could give Emil Bove this spot on the 3rd Circuit is because cowardly Democratic senators refused to confirm Biden's nominee to the seat following a bad-faith, Islamophobic smear campaign by Republicans.
Utterly shameful and self-defeating. slate.com/news-and-pol...
Today is a good day — any day is a good day — to read and share this February resignation letter from SDNY prosecutor Hagan Scotten to Emil Bove.
It’s the type of thing you show your kids as an example of how to be.