Probably a different communication goal then!
02.03.2026 23:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@grimalkina.bsky.social
Psychologist for the humans of tech. Author of The Psychology of Software Teams (2026). Founder: Catharsis Consulting (strategy * science). she/her π³οΈβπ https://www.drcathicks.com/ Host at: https://www.changetechnically.fyi/
Probably a different communication goal then!
02.03.2026 23:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0please give me some credit that after spending every ding-dong working day collaborating in some very tangible way with software teams for the past 10+ years I have actual experience here; it is not a rare word.
02.03.2026 22:23 β π 63 π 2 π¬ 5 π 1but then there would be fewer jobs for people like me hehe
02.03.2026 21:39 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0happy birthday!!!!
02.03.2026 21:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I can relate so much to this. Glad for your ability to transmute this into something that benefits others!!
02.03.2026 21:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I don't think we can avoid our context-specific ways of speaking, but just that it helps to be aware of them when there are repeatable patterns of misunderstanding that can be gently guarded against for those who care about these collaborative convos :)
02.03.2026 21:32 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Some people have joint conversational and communication goals, hard as it may be for you to imagine (or impossible, perhaps!)
02.03.2026 21:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π«Ά
02.03.2026 20:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0...but genuinely, the psychological role I've played on this has been the most impactful thing I've left a lot of partners with, especially in spaces of working on social problems
02.03.2026 20:09 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0literally just being a person who is "not afraid to think about how we make an argument with numbers" (I do not at all mean this in a contemptuous way, many people are very unfairly treated when they HAVE tried this) has made me invaluable to many partners. Ofc I have many richer complex skills....
02.03.2026 20:09 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0much of the "help people with technology" work in the world is way more stuff like this than anything else
02.03.2026 20:08 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0very underappreciated way of seeing all of this right now is reckoning with HOW MUCH most of the world has been cut off from truly being able to analyze data and how much they want to. No one ever really believed me on this when I was doing data science consulting but I keep thinking of it now
02.03.2026 19:48 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I feel like it's a mix
02.03.2026 19:08 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes that's what I'm pointing out
02.03.2026 19:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(excluding people who are actually math*educators*, the very folks most underappreciated by your average math prof)
02.03.2026 19:07 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah well math can't figure out how to teach most of the people on the planet so I don't pay much attention to what math profs say about human learning and problem-solving
02.03.2026 19:06 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Oh all good all additive
02.03.2026 17:54 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I mean I do think it serves important communication goals in that context
02.03.2026 17:41 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Makes sense!
02.03.2026 17:41 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0trivial-as-joyful-scaffolded-ease-by-relying-on-some-innovation vs trivial-as-dismissive-replacement context essentially
02.03.2026 17:36 β π 27 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0I don't really have an opinion about which side should cave on this, I just observe it, constantly
02.03.2026 17:34 β π 19 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0this is one of those little emotional context conversation traps I see every single day
02.03.2026 17:34 β π 21 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0just a general observation from someone at the intersections: folks in software do not usually realize that people outside of software find the convention of calling things "trivial" incredibly off-putting!
02.03.2026 17:33 β π 111 π 10 π¬ 12 π 6βPlotkin knew what would happen if Kennedy became health secretary. βOh, I expected it,β he said of the myriad changes that Kennedy has overseen. βI did everything I could when Kennedy was up for confirmation, to convince people like Senator [Bill] Cassidy to vote against him β and failed.β
02.03.2026 12:49 β π 67 π 9 π¬ 1 π 1We're getting into "could do a better powered study than many of the developer case studies people are freaking out about" sample size territory with number of people using my Learning Opportunities skill, based on stars
02.03.2026 17:23 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Happy to share that I'm joining the research advisory for Quotient as a Strategic Advisor. In a time of great opportunity and change for software development, it's a joy to collaborate with a team that is building for lifting their partners with shared evidence.
www.linkedin.com/posts/lizzie...
Either way I shall continue on my chosen path of, as one of my wonderful readers described my book in one of the best quotes I've gotten about it: "a compassionate obliteration of the way I would have explained the last fifteen years of my life, but somehow I want to say thank you"
01.03.2026 18:18 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
But question the pipe itself???? Heresy.
Situation is different now. Not sure if we'll calcify back down into "the SWEs have to look exactly the same" or seize this as an opportunity to *actually* question the narrow mental model of technical problem-solving.
The model in everyone's minds back then was "oh lord we do not have enough software engineers", but essentially ZERO curiosity available to question what software engineering skills were or bad assumptions about that. Some ppl did very good work achieving goals of getting more people into the pipe
01.03.2026 18:14 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0It's not that there's not room for a lot of voices, it is necessary to have many perspectives, but the way "I was an engineer" was always elevated over those of us who worked on the social science side of education was noticeable
01.03.2026 18:10 β π 8 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0