I don't know who needs to hear this, or why I need to say it, or what it means, or how it isn't stupid, but...

Not where facts and logic usually lead, in my experience

We tried impeachment twice before.

But THIS time, we'll use ARTICLE 2, SECTION 4, which is a different form of impeachment (FACT CHECK: IT ISN'T) and removes the whole administration at once! (FACT CHECK: IT DOESN'T)

Hope unchecked by reason is the complacency which brought on all this madness--a very high price indeed

You can hope for something and still think it's unlikely...

'cause that was totally about Mickey Mouse off-year elections

It also doesn't say you can impeach the whole administration at once!

Article 2, Section 4: "All the dishes in the kitchen shall shatter upon being struck with a hammer."

See? Hit one dish with a hammer & they all shatter!

9

A condiment but not the kindimeant

You have to understand MAGA logic.

All they need is a stupid way to say "same thing on your side!" (even if it's an obscure rumor about Andrew Jackson) and that means every complaint about their side can be dismissed as hypocrisy. Complaint dismissed = exoneration!

Yes, they really are that dumb.

It's called 'thumbing'

A very simple test of whether that's a no or a yes is to imagine "so, no" or "so, yes" following it.

Cassidy's words basically amount to "I'm such an unreflective dipshit that I don't even bother to THINK about it."

So, NO.

Also the fucking Breakfast Club

Everything in the past 30 years

We have no evidence / the odds say we should.

Kinda sounds like we "calculated" the "odds" based on crap instead of evidence, doesn't it?

I'm sorry to sound like such a looser, but I'm going to loose it if people don't loose a certain lose approach to spelling. Maybe I need to losen up.

To put it another way: we already tried impeaching him under Article 2, Section 4, twice in his first term.

Article 2, Secton 4: "All our entrees come with fries."

See? Just order fries an' ya git all the entrees at once!

Fun Fact: Article 2, Section 4 is not some special form of impeachment, distinct from forms of impeachment mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution. It's just one of the places in the Constitution which talks about impeachment.

Ahem. I believe the correct term is 'ephebantic'.

Article 2, section 4: "All composite integers can be factored into a set of primes."

See? Says all, not any! Facter one of 'em an' you'se factered 'em all!

Plenty of people still struggling with this

No president has ever been removed from office at any point in American history

And again...

Not all of us will remember which ones caved. The least intelligent, least moral people amongst us will find it easier to conclude "fuck all Democrats!" and help the Republicans to win in the future, caving in the most disgustingly hypocritical way possible.

I have this book, I think, & another like it (with cats!) but I only ever read bits of them. For me, the problem wasn't too many words (I love words) but that the "story" makes them awkward to dip into as you can with a dictionary or well-indexed text. I need piecemeal options or I get overwhelmed.

Dying inside because someone with an M.S. in science journalism is using begrudgingly to mean disparagingly

$80 if I'm strict. Stretching things a tad, I can get to $160

MAGA: Duzzit ownya? Well, duzzit? Den dats wut I voted fer! Heh heh