I love her too.
“From The Depths,” William Balfour Ker
Why?
I have to go to bed but real quick Ernie has always been in the wrong and Bert has always been absolutely correct to be frustrated by Ernie’s chaotic bullshit
#DismantleZionism
What makes you say this is going away? Sorry, did I miss something?
"The track bleeds their characteristic minimalist darkness while driving forward a hypnotic portrayal of rhythmic exchanges of discomfort, disquiet, and blindness inherent in only the most lovingly sadomasochistic relationships."
That's glorious!
Dismantling an apartheid state doesn't mean genociding 9 million Israelis. It means a free Palestine where everyone is equal under the law.
100% on the politics exam, Steve. Well done! ⭐
We’re not approaching fascism, we’re living its rehearsal. Arendt warned us: isolate the people, destroy truth, create enemies, hollow institutions, and wrap it all in legality. If this feels terrifying, it’s because your instincts are working. The curtain’s rising we must name the play.
It's a true statement. Jewish Israelis have rights which non-Jewish Israelis don't. Please look up the 'Nation State law'.
palestine.beehiiv.com/p/8-tiers-is...
Fuck off, genocide apologist.
And... ?
You're absolutely delusional if you think this conflict started on October 7th. It started in 1948 -- in fact, before, Israel was founded there were roaming Jewish Zionist gangs terrorising the population of Palestine, killing them or forcing them to leave.
Well, I've got news for you. The right to resist an occupation is enshrined in international law.
The United Nations resolution that affirms the right of occupied people to resist is UN General Assembly Resolution 37/43, adopted on December 3, 1982 as well as Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions
The ICRC, which you cited earlier agrees (see 'What the law says'), as do various other aid groups.
www.icrc.org/en/document/...
This is another factually incorrect statement:
Under Article 42 of the Hague Regulations (1907) and Article 6 of the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), a territory is considered occupied when it is "actually placed under the authority of the hostile army."
1/2
Why do you think that's rebuttal? That's making my point for me. I didn't think that when he was speaking he wasn't being rhetorical. I'm aware that he's framing it as wrong. That's my point. I'm pointing out how Israelis view Palestinians. Of course there are some left and dissident voices.
The important difference is, of course, that one group is an occupied people fighting for their survival and to not be ethnically cleansed, and the other is a racist colonialist state which wants to cleanse all of Palestine for their ethno-state.
2/2
I can provide you examples of Israeli TV with a kids show where they make fun of Christ, or talk shows where they debate whether 'all Gazans are guilty' and entertainment shows where the suspect Israeli soldier rapist is praised as a hero. 1/2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLdb...
I can provide you with plenty of evidence of extremism being widespread in Israel -- not only amongst the population, a significant number who call for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, but in the govt. where numerous officials have made various genocidal statements.
No, I want Israelis to stop their killing and attacking their neighbours, end the apartheid, and give equal rights to all people under the law. The state should be Palestine, where all faiths and all ethnicities are free and equal under the law and free to practice their faith.
There's no war, it's a genocide. And Israel started the war before 1948, when it was unilaterally founded by Ben Gurion without the consent of the population who lived there. It has always been the intention of Zionists to violently expel the non-Jewish population for their ethno-state.
Even if your assertion was true, you cannot justify starving two million people because you want to crush a resistance group. That's Nazi thinking, and it's illegal and a war crime.
You're right about the IRCR, I must have been thinking about another group. What I'm saying isn't my opinion that I pulled out of my hat, I'm literally citing the opinons of human rights groups, lawyers, and people who have been to and understand the situation better than either you or I.
Ah yes, the ol' "The United Nations, ICJ, and every major human rights group, including some Israeli ones" are anti-semitic gambit. This nonsense doesn't convince anyone except Zionist. Literally no one. It's absurd. By the way, you can add various genocide scholars and historians to that list, too.
