StoneCrow3

Not likely.

Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore Trump's so-called "executive orders." Ignore HIM! Treat him like the narcissistic toddler that he is by taking away his audience!

Yes! Civil disobedience! Ignore his so-called "execute orders." Keep organizations running that he is trying to shut down! Ignore HIM, AND anyone who supports him! That's the absolute worst insult to a narcissist--take away his audience (btw, also the best way to deal with a toddler's tantrum.)

All The Federal Lawsuits Related to Trump Admin Executive Orders We put them all in one place.

If you want to know who is suing the shit out of the Trump administration here you go!! These folks, thousands of documents to give you this information‼️ #court #law #trump #lawsuits #musk

www.courtwatch.news/p/lawsuits-r...

canada us border rights clinic, https://canadaborderclinic.org/migrant-info/can-i-make-a-refugee-claim-at-the-canadian-land-border/ info on claiming asylum, https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refug... TikTok video by 🇨🇦 Lyss 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🇵🇸

www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2rMUg4o/

I think the only ones who are going to do that is us.

Would that it were that simple. Unfortunately, no state is solidly one or the other. They all have both sides present.

newer stuff, and sell to other, richer people at higher prices? That's unconscionable, even as a business practice, much less as diplomacy. What, is he channeling his old, real estate robber-baron persona? Or, is he too senile to realize that was decades ago and has nothing to do with a presidency?

THIS THREATENS A STUPID ACT OF WAR!
1. The President has no authority to commit troops anywhere without Congressional approval. He certainly can't declare war on a whim. Only Congress can declare war. 2. His diplomatic solution to Gaza is evict the tenants, bulldoze existing infrastructure, build

20. Congressional Research Service, "Recall of Legislators and the Removal of Members of Congress from Office," January 5, 2012

noted legal precedent is U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, in which the Supreme Court decided that states did not have the right to impose new terms, qualifications, or conditions of service on federal officials.[20]

not included in the final version. Some state constitutions have stated the right of citizens to recall their members of the United States Congress, but whether it is constitutionally legal at the federal level has not been yet been ruled upon by the United States Supreme Court. One of the closest

I hate to burst your bubble, but I found the following online.
"Recall of federal officials
ballotpedia.org/Laws_governi...
The United States Constitution does not provide for recall of any elected federal official. The option was considered during the drafting of of the document in 1787, but was

I would support impeachment of the entire Trump administration, complete cancellation of everything it has tried to do, strict laws put in place to limit executive power and use of executive orders, and laws facilitating federal prosecution of money influence and gerrymandering.

Well said. Xenophobia, especially justified mostly by stale paranoia, is useless time wasting when we have bigger problems closer to home. I may not trust the Chinese Communist Party blindly, but Chinese people on Rednote seem as curious about us as we are about them. I find that refreshing.

That's the spirit!

Keep up the pressure on your end. We'll keep up the resistance here. Together, we will put these democracy-hating fascists where they all belong.

vote. Basically, if it stands, it would completely disenfranchise anyone who disagrees with the Retrumplican party line. Vigorous legal challenges are in the works, and many of us are incensed beyond words. For me, Canada, I stand with you, Mexico, China, and anyone else Trump thinks he can bully.

I'm in Tennessee, whose Republican-supermajority state legislature has just passed a law making it a Class E felony for, among other things, public officials to vote against the Trump administration's immigration policies. That would carry a 1-6 year prison term, after which one could no longer

I don't think those are rocks. Instead, I see them as pieces rising from the hand to materializing into a bird of prey, perhaps an eagle. It's being summoned magically by someone we can only partially see.

Don't forget China. Trump has slapped tariffs on them, too, even if it isn't as much. He just did it to try to appeal to his war-hawk supporters.

What Is Stochastic Terrorism? Stochastic terrorism refers to public figures using hateful or dehumanizing language to incite violence. They don't give direct instructions, but their words create a dangerous environment in which violence becomes more likely. How It Works • The Speaker: Uses hostile or demonizing language about individuals or groups that's vague enough to deny responsibility or claim it was misinterpreted. • The Listener: Feels validated or triggered and interprets it as a call to action. • The Result: Unpredictable acts of violence. Why It Matters • Words have power. • Words and even gestures can mislead and manipulate, and rhetoric can shape decisions. • Recognizing this tactic helps people make choices. • Learn to spot it for your own growth and for others. • Stand up for kindness and accountability. It's not implusive. It's intentional. Recognize it. Stay informed. Help others. Take Back Control.

#StochasticTerrorism refers to ..hateful or dehumanizing language to incite violence. They don't give direct instructions, .. in which violence becomes more likely.
• Speaker: Uses hostile or demonizing language ..vague enough to deny responsibility
• Listener: interprets it as a call to action.”

Me, either. I applaud them.

first administration reported. One description I read likened his first administration to a 12-year-old trying to run an air traffic control tower by randomly pushing buttons. This one seems far worse. He isn't even reading the stuff he's signing, instead istening to an aide explain it all to him.

Also, keep the explanation to a single, simple point, and be prepared to repeat that same point over and over until you're sure he's gotten it. For visual aids, too, use pictures only. He hates having to read words in print except for his own name. That was what people trying to deal with his

Not unless we give up for good. I haven't, and I won't.

Oh, yes, we will, even if we have to force the issue!

Doesn't mean we can keep trying, or that we should. Quite the opposite, in fact.

My wife has made noises about siding with Canada if Trump tries to annex it. I can't say I disagree at all.

I don't blame you one bit. I'm ashamed and disgusted to have been born an American at this point.