There will be.
31.10.2025 03:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@markhertling.bsky.social
Former soldier. Student of leadership & national security. Now a teacher, author, speaker & analyst. Always looking for civility…and new adventures. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-hertling-dba-57987066
There will be.
31.10.2025 03:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That’s very kind. Everyone is special.
31.10.2025 02:15 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, @pksjones.bsky.social if your pre-order from @ballastbookco.bsky.social all the pre-orders will have my signature in the book, no book plates. I’m hoping I sign many, because half of all proceeds will go to the National Ability Center.
31.10.2025 02:14 — 👍 59 🔁 11 💬 1 📌 0Yeah, sorry for my non-poker face when I heard what the speaker said.
31.10.2025 01:52 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thank you!
31.10.2025 01:51 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Looking forward to the discussion, Jen! @briefingwithpsaki.bsky.social
31.10.2025 00:32 — 👍 78 🔁 9 💬 2 📌 0No, we should not. This is a simple training memo and people are making it a bigger deal than it is. And please stop asking me to comment on x.
30.10.2025 20:52 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 2Thanks for this, Kevin. You’re spot on.
30.10.2025 13:17 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0“I think it’s an approach that can safely be described as tactics without a strategy,” said Jonathan Czin, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who previously analyzed Chinese politics at the C.I.A.
30.10.2025 12:50 — 👍 239 🔁 51 💬 14 📌 1Thank you Jim.
30.10.2025 02:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Come join us in Gettysburg on 11/6 as we ask how do we keep our institutions strong, civilian leadership accountable, and armed forces apolitical?
Our speakers will be:
@sykescharlie.bsky.social @walshfreedom.bsky.social  @markhertling.bsky.social @milestaylor.bsky.social @conorlambpa.bsky.social
Thank you.
29.10.2025 22:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sure does.
29.10.2025 22:14 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And that is still true. What I was pointing out is the officer’s oath doesn’t have the “obey” part.
29.10.2025 22:00 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is just a thought, but what if it isn’t the military doing it?
29.10.2025 21:59 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0Thank you.
29.10.2025 21:58 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s late there! Thanks.
29.10.2025 21:44 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Both @mcfaulmike.bsky.social and I will be joining @nicollewallace.bsky.social on @msnbc.com at 5:30 ET. Lots to talk about.
29.10.2025 21:22 — 👍 119 🔁 14 💬 12 📌 1Some discussion recently on the use of NDAs in the military  
My thoughts in the @thebulwark.com 
www.thebulwark.com/p/why-milita...
All these would make for good discussion in the current civilian-military environment. I don’t know you or your actions, but I did find it unfortunate you’d condemn a book by a bright scholar without reading it, and then insult me, since you don’t know me either. Your call. I’m out.
29.10.2025 05:16 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There was really only one “point.” It appears you missed it thinking instead of another rude reply.
29.10.2025 02:37 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Oh, so you’ve read her book? Or no, just making a judgement on the title? What an informed take on a new book. And I’m sure the “work” you’re doing is consuming you.
29.10.2025 01:04 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0This isn’t good, for Walmart or more importantly the people who need food and rely on this program.
28.10.2025 23:55 — 👍 362 🔁 105 💬 28 📌 7Congratulations, once again, Dr @kschake.bsky.social on yet another triumph.
28.10.2025 23:53 — 👍 79 🔁 12 💬 2 📌 0As a former member of the Bipartisan Policy Center and Nutrition Security Task Force, I signed and wholeheartedly support this action.
28.10.2025 23:12 — 👍 244 🔁 51 💬 6 📌 3Joining @rieckhoff.bsky.social & @samsteindc.bsky.social and @aliciamenendez.bsky.social (who is sitting in for @nicollewallace.bsky.social at 5 ET on @msnbc.com
28.10.2025 20:45 — 👍 82 🔁 10 💬 10 📌 0Beautiful!
28.10.2025 13:44 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Some thoughts on the shift of a Carrier Strike Group from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean. My latest in @thebulwark.com
27.10.2025 18:40 — 👍 184 🔁 46 💬 10 📌 4This guy? I might recommend an eye exam. 😊
27.10.2025 02:26 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I was asked to be on a bi-partisan committee supplying congress with information on food insecurity. 
Yes, there are going to be A LOT of people surprised when they see the extent of our fellow citizens who use SNAP (about 40 million, lots of veterans) and WIC (over 6 million) programs.