Zach Rosenberg

Allie’s forces

They had the Einzatsgruppen units ready to go into Mandatory Palestine to kill Jews there. Including those who fled in 1933.

They literally killed Jews outside of Europe and Jews who wished to flee were not allowed to do so in Nazi controlled territory

They literally prevented Jews from fleeing. Many who survived were those who reached safe borders before the Nazis caught up Whixh was a matter of pure geography.

They had already begun killing some Jews in North Africa witj plans to move onto the rest

That was in 1933. They fully planned to kill them later after they finished with europe

LEt's just join hands and agree you do not get one free use of Nazi symbology as a treat

There are, perhaps better messengers than others for certain clauses

I'm sorry, but you cannot actually really believe the Nazis wanted a Jewish state.

It’s what-oh my G-D

He has a totenkopf on his chest. I am very happy with "do not have the symbol of the SS on you" as a purity test tbqh.

This isn't really out of the norm for Grim. He was all in on defending Aaron Coleman a few years ago

We should all be more like you.

No sarcasm intended, the world would genuinely be better. Surlier, but better

I think in this case tje advice of “don’t admit to illegal drug use” is needed for people. I’m not deriding anyone who does but giving any admission to lawbreaking online can be unwise for multiple reasons

Yeah but you think that about like pizza toppings too

Some people have a role necessitating visibility. Those are protesters, litigators, politicians. Some people have roles that need to stay invisible

I think it’s more important to do good than to appear to be doing good.

We’re attorneys. Telling people how best not to make themselves targets is helping against injustice

I’m very fond of reminding people the courts are still an amazing defense for the vast majority of cases. If you’re going to hide people…

Don’t give the Feds a reason to search your house!

Well to be fair. Depends where

Please do not post probable cause online. Please

In 1729

I’m revoking your New Yorker card

Claudia…

This isn’t the way, Dwight. It really isn’t. Don’t do it.

"Received a favorable settlement."

David, please show me where this is. In the court documents. Not some leak to a favorable journalist. A certified court record and joint statement by parties.

Where is that settlement figure mentioned in a court record or anything beyond an attorney’s comment to one friendly journalist?

There is a settlement where it is unknown who paid whom. Except for the listed number which the defendants did not have to pay.

No, David, we didn't. and I don't care about these anonymous friends you have, to be frank. Unlike you, we know these situations and how to read a settlement.

You have been obsessed with this for two years and frankly, it is creepy

Yes that’s part of the settlement.

David when a bunch of attorneys have told you that you’re wrong, maybe it’s time to consider why people in a field may know something you do not

Given the issues over jurisdiction, I don't think that's very odd at all.

Especially when they didn't retract anything. It does not preclude him paying their fees