New YouTube video on socionics with Trey (@trey4l)! Premiering in 2.5 hours (3pm ET):
youtu.be/22aFsbwirc4
This covers all the major points of my research. Not to be missed!
@ibrahimtencer.bsky.social
Socionics • Mathematical psychology • Personality types for self-knowledge and personal growth. Creator of http://sedecology.com, a social network for typology.
New YouTube video on socionics with Trey (@trey4l)! Premiering in 2.5 hours (3pm ET):
youtu.be/22aFsbwirc4
This covers all the major points of my research. Not to be missed!
Introducing my first ever YouTube video, an introduction to socionics!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzwV...
Alright then
17.08.2025 06:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0How much did it cost? If they're using Reinin dichotomies then I'm afraid the length of the interview will not mean much. Not to mention the diminishing returns.
17.08.2025 05:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 07 hours??
16.08.2025 23:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We have personality and machines don't.
10.08.2025 12:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I have a simple introduction to socionics here:
www.sedecology.com/articles/24/...
They use it to ask questions about typology too.
LLMs are quite bad at socionics in particular because there aren't a lot of sources out there for it and it mixes it up with MBTI.
If you're interested in knowing yourself better
21.06.2025 01:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Realistic. If you go far enough into the future they would use incompatible file formats.
11.06.2025 01:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Socionics is not a spinoff of MBTI; it was developed independently.
18.05.2025 22:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's true
14.05.2025 12:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Above all what?
24.04.2025 07:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Socionics isn't an offshoot of MBTI, it was developed independently. And Jack didn't come up with it either.
24.04.2025 07:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0He didn't invent socionics
24.04.2025 07:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What do you mean by biased history?
24.04.2025 07:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Wisdom comes from experience and undergoing hardship. Very easy to be smart without having that.
07.04.2025 18:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Silly clickbait title
07.04.2025 18:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Alien people" lol, my interest in this subject is casual at best. My understanding was that the other hypotheses didn't fit very well. Which one better explains the data? You only need one.
03.03.2025 00:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It took seeing adult bullies to understand that my childhood bullies didn’t even really want to hurt me, they just wanted to feel powerful and how I felt about it wasn’t even in the equation.
I can’t imagine someone not outgrowing that, but apparently it happens quite a lot!
We already know 2 is true (at least for travel, if not communication) due to the speed of light. And then again there is Tabby's star which proved that even if you have convincing evidence, people still won't believe it.
02.03.2025 15:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1When I worked in UK academia I recall hearing of a Japanese man who was baffled at how Britain had decided to run its universities like firms. “Why? Your universities are excellent and your firms are terrible.”
25.02.2025 22:24 — 👍 5472 🔁 1495 💬 23 📌 38"You can type someone as a Ni user by what they talk and how they talk etc."
I broadly agree with your point here, we type people by the content of their expressions (Fe) and actions (Se). I guess I'm not really sure what the problem is then — rationality in socionics is different from J/P in MBTI.
In socionics all the IMEs are "external" i.e. observable to different degrees, not just the extroverted ones. Observability is determined by which function they occupy: sedecology.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-...
06.02.2025 22:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0?
20.01.2025 21:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The algorithm is garbage, Twitter's actually promotes intelligent content (if you want it to at least).
20.01.2025 18:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0New history of socionics posted! A timeline of some of the most important publications and events in the history of socionics ideas and the Western socionics community.
www.sedecology.com/articles/57/...
"writes Kenneth Gergen"
What does the name Kenneth Gergen refer to, if not a unified self?
Much of the terminology in socionics is old and outdated: id, superid, creative/demonstrative/mobilizing functions. Even ethics is arguably worse as a name than feeling. Unfortunately it doesn't seem worth it to change them. Maybe after the semantics are nailed down once and for all.
04.12.2024 11:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0