Well, that's this camel's straw.
Fun while it lasted.
You should consider reading the petition fully.
It's called a double standard. You asked, I answered, not my problem you didn't like it.
The absolute CRINGE of Snoop pausing to let the audience say 'six in the morn' and nobody responded because there are only 12 Black video game devs
Honestly, I expect the overt betrayal of trans users to be announced following the use of the phrase "as we pivot".
After the perfunctory apology, of course. Jay's reposting about capital investment.
Posting content from users who have him blocked, contacting users around blocks, posting bluesky content on other sites to further a beef. That's three TOS violations ofc the top of my head.
A US military without queer people will have the cybersecurity of your dad's Yahoo mail.
11yo’s class had their final D.A.R.E lesson today. Apparently the cops promised ice cream to the class with the most kids wearing D.A.R.E shirts - my kid’s class - and then they just… didn’t give out any ice cream. So thanks, D.A.R.E, for teaching my kid the most vital lesson of all: that cops lie.
Shootings in America have been out of control for my entire lifetime. We have been shooting our own children regularly for decades now. Members of congress are beholden to organizations that advocate for unlimited guns.
But one CEO gets shot and NOW it's an emergency?
Go fuck your entire self.
I think I may restart my prior hiatus. Back for like a week after seven months away lmao.
This isn't changing. It's not even on their radar.
Jay seems to have time for what matters. Capital.
The central premise of the title is refuted by me reading it here, Michael.
I was gone for seven months. I forget what his deal was, and am having trouble tracking it down. Any help appreciated!
Note that this report mentions the Dutch method you cited to me as a reason to oppose this treatment model. Which I found odd, as that report you cited seems to side with this model, too.
I'll specifically call out this one bit.
Resharing for ease of reference, so it's clear what I mean.
Okay. Then. In light of the fact that death is doubtless a worser outcome than inability to orgasm, can you tell me why you DO have an issue with standards of care outlined in my 2023 US meta report?
That, again, wasn't my question. Do you think you making that decision for your kid means other parents can't treat their kid's endometriosis?
I have friends who are professional academics and I used to grant write in another field in another life. It's likely worse in the US, I imagine.
But I *do* have studies I can point to to support my position, and yours seems to amount to 'I want more'. I don't disagree. Show me harm, tho.
As a former licensed banker I just want to stress (not to you, Matthew, I'm certain you know) just how catastrophic losing the FDIC would be.
It's just laughably absurd. It would gut the US economy in a year as all those little banks dying lead to runs on the big banks.
This is clown nose stuff.
But you better respond to this when you do.
I'm not reading that one, sorry. I don't need opinion pieces. Feel free to share the email excerpt, though. Not averse to the point you're trying to make.
These also aren't negative findings. (With the exception of the non-controversial surgical intervention study lack.) They're appeals for more research. (that I think we both want to see happen)
Governments saying 'we'd like more proof' isn't proof of harm exceeding benefit.
