Jonathan Simons 's Avatar

Jonathan Simons

@jonathansimons.bsky.social

Partner, Public First and Head of Education Practice. Education strategy + policy advisory. Former civil servant + think tanker. Occasional loud LFC. Centrist Dad, so naturally I also have a Substack.

3,047 Followers  |  830 Following  |  472 Posts  |  Joined: 24.10.2023  |  1.976

Latest posts by jonathansimons.bsky.social on Bluesky

I meanโ€ฆ.justโ€ฆ..

21.11.2025 09:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

God love Test cricket

21.11.2025 07:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Youโ€™ve cursed us

21.11.2025 06:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

John, I have some news

21.11.2025 03:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I donโ€™t care what anyone says, however elegant and English he is, he ainโ€™t a reliable Test opener

21.11.2025 02:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Well that already bodes well. Ffs

21.11.2025 02:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Alarm set for 2am - see all the ๐Ÿ lovers in a few hoursโ€ฆ.

20.11.2025 22:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Funnily enough, โ€œI will win! I will win! I will win!โ€ serves both as the last line for Nessun Dorma and could be repurposed for that alternative opera, which Iโ€™d definitely watch

20.11.2025 21:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Great thread. But apart from this, thereโ€™s no issues

20.11.2025 20:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I ask this question approximately weekly

19.11.2025 09:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

The BBC Scotland commentary for Kenny McLeanโ€™s halfway line goal is glorious. Stuff of dreams. ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Congratulations #Scotland, see you at the World Cup.

18.11.2025 22:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 921    ๐Ÿ” 369    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 30    ๐Ÿ“Œ 76

Oh come on.

Tho Iโ€™m delighted that K+C has solved all serious problems in its borough, and therefore has spare resources for a stupid stunt

17.11.2025 21:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Trying hard to imagine a meeting more awful than Trump meeting Infantino, and failing news.sky.com/story/trump-...

17.11.2025 20:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Strong "recently divorced dad trying to hit on much younger women" energy here.

14.11.2025 20:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 143    ๐Ÿ” 26    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 11    ๐Ÿ“Œ 5

Yeah. And indeed, probably not tired their hands pre election. But given we are where we are, and given the capabilities of key personnel, you can see the logic of this move

14.11.2025 17:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I just think they wouldnโ€™t have had the character or communication skills or politics, frankly, to have styled it out and made the case. And as such it would be pretty terminal for the Starmer - Reeves duopoly.

14.11.2025 17:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Right! And thatโ€™s the precise trade off. But much (not all) of the discourse has been of the โ€œwhy on earth would you not raise income tax, itโ€™s self evidently a good ideaโ€

14.11.2025 17:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is a self inflicted wound! Causing the U Turn also makes them look stupid! Theyโ€™ll need to work harder to raise the money elsewhere! Income tax rises would have been horrendously bad for the government!

These things can (and probably are) all true at once!

14.11.2025 17:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes, political leadership is sometimes about taking on and winning an argument. But Iโ€™d barely seen anyone even make the case that a tax rise (especially in the context of manifesto brief) would have been horrendously unpopular - and those who did were castigated for Not Thinking Long Term

14.11.2025 17:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Quite a contrast to the BlueSky consensus the last 24 hours

14.11.2025 17:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 59    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 38    ๐Ÿ“Œ 11

Wait, youโ€™re saying sometimes a carrot works better than a stick?

14.11.2025 11:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

See also: our call centres are very busy at this time. Spoiler alert, no theyโ€™re not, youโ€™re just building in permanent under capacity. Donโ€™t treat people like idiots.

14.11.2025 11:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Dear @britishairwaysque.bsky.social, when you put on a flight w a certain number of seats, and when people then buy those seats, and bring with them the hand luggage you allow them, please do not hector us that โ€œthe flight is very busy and we have no bag spaceโ€. You literally designed it this way!

14.11.2025 11:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Departments Split On Size Of International Student Levy Exclusive: There is disagreement within the government over how bigย the new levy on international students should be.

I understand there's a split within govt over how big the controversial new levy on international students should be

The q at the moment is whether it should be 6% or a ยฃ1,000 fee

Different depts & unis would favour one over the other....read more below๐Ÿ‘‡
www.politicshome.com/news/article...

13.11.2025 12:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

The misspelling is a real connoisseurโ€™s touch ๐Ÿ‘

12.11.2025 09:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As late as the 1960s, the Prime Ministerโ€™s driver used to always have to make sure he had four one penny coins in his pocket because if there was an alert of imminent Soviet nuclear attack when the PM was travelling, that was how the PM would dial Whitehall and coordinate the UKs response.

10.11.2025 14:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

(And theyโ€™d have done better to drop half the signatories, however grandly titled, who have irrelevant bugbears shoved in)

09.11.2025 10:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 11    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But for the elite scientists and mathematicians here, writing about more elite science and maths, it is wholly untrue to say a prescription of more woolly relevance and more breadth would give us more of that, or indeed more Fellows of the Royal Society in future.

09.11.2025 10:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

We absolutely need more people with greater maths capacity at all stages (GGSE 4+ at a minimum, ideally higher), and we need everyone to be more mathematical for society and the economy. Not just cos AI, but because almost every field of life is becoming more mathematical.

09.11.2025 10:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 13    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Thirdly, they espouse the tired trope of real world relevance. For an august body that focusses on evidence, this is very disappointing. Work from David Thomas and Axiom maths, and our own work in Maths Horizons, shows a necessity for problem solving and challenge, not โ€œmaths through recipesโ€

09.11.2025 10:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@jonathansimons is following 20 prominent accounts