Trump’s power and by extension his entire movement are built around the idea that by asserting something you manifest it in reality. Even if it’s not true many people will behave as if is so you can get away with it.
It is alarmingly effective in law, domestic politics. It cannot unblock a strait.
I wonder what Trumpo's thinking about while that's happening
Not a lawyer either but to my understanding, he's declaring the state of Texas's "interpretation" of the law, which affects enforcement of it (e.g. medical licensing, prosecutions). The letter of the law has not changed, the courts will decide it, with horrendous state persecution in the meantime.
fujoing out
These people are poison. They will unleash racist thugs on the streets of this country and call it security. They will subjugate us to the US and call it patriotism. They must be stopped. There is no more important task in politics.
First a Nobel prize, now this... Is there anything that orange wonderkid can't do?
Laws are there to protect social norms, not people.
Sometimes I worry that my signal corps just think flags are fun for waving any which way
Jane Fonda stole my back pain
I need everyone to know that on the crochet subreddit the mods made a big post about how they're taking a week off because there was too much fighting/political posts. so there's currently no mods on r/crochet and people are being absolutely insane
www.ft.com/content/d0b7...
No thank you.
“Zia Yusuf, the party's head of policy, told the Times last year that his party would adopt a 'Trump 2.0' approach to immigration, saying: "We are going to move at great speed. It'll be much more like Trump mark two than Trump mark one"
When they tell you who they are, you better listen”
NEW: Google’s “Auto Browse” AI tool includes a warning that attributes responsibility to users for the bot’s actions.
“Use Gemini carefully and take control if needed,” reads a disclaimer on the demo version. “You are responsible for Gemini’s actions during tasks.”
www.wired.com/story/google...
Trump does get random weird one-off obsessions like Greenland, but a disturbing amount of what he does makes sense if you ask: “Is this intelligble as part of a plan to guarantee the success of a second coup?”
She is amongst us! @claireberlinski.bsky.social
Being proactive needn't be at the expense of wrong and counterproductive messaging.
Stella post Stella post Stella post then BAM!!
Drive by but: It's important to get the "semantics" right because you risk depressing the vote for people who are actually on your side.
This to me is one of the most telling moments in recent US political history. At the time, the story was "look at John McCain, standing up for small l liberal values that make us great!" But the real story was, holy shit, the GOP rank and file doesn't buy that shit anymore. youtu.be/jrnRU3ocIH4?...
I've had success when pair programming with an AI though I've had to stay absolutely on top of things, generating in very small portions and refining and refactoring as 'we' go, and it's only been better than hand-writing in a small number of cases. Just let 'em fly and they're death-traps.
Come on UK. It's not as though we want an army over there, just a few people to confirm our commitment to NATO. Please?
AI is only useful for anything you can confirm independently. If it's the same effort to confirm it as it is to find it out in the first place, there's no point in using AI.
For writing software, it's great. Does it work? Let me run it and see. For most other things, I can't imagine a time saving.
Ham
Tomato
Mozzarella
Linguine
I think given the ridiculously leading context, respondents well understood the subtext of the question, but it's all such a hopeless crock of shit that it does indeed say more of the public than the matter in question. Which is why we need to leave this to the experts and the children involved.
Cars should never be driven by anyone. Supporters say academics need to better understand, opponents say it's unethical to drive machines that can kill people, particularly when the driver may be drunk or have mental health issues and may not know how to drive.
Gimme a break.
Link to full survey: www.whitestoneinsight.com/s/Transgende...
The emphasis on "never" was added by Hinder. The poll was commissioned by a very terfy organisation. The question headline is ambiguous (though I still concur with the OP's conclusion), the 'context' for the question incredibly leading.
If you can substitute "hungry ghost trapped in a jar" for "AI" in a sentence it's probably a valid use case for LLMs. Take "I have a bunch of hungry ghosts in jars, they mainly write SQL queries for me". Sure. Reasonable use case.
"My girlfriend is a hungry ghost I trapped in a jar"? No. Deranged.
Not for Farage according to this
