Aurélie Méjean

Une photographie de J. A. Schumpeter qui a l’air très pincé

POV : tu entends à la radio que P. Aghion a inventé la destruction créatrice.

We’re running out of backstops.

Il est possible de trouver des arbitrages entre équité et efficacité économique avec une tarification du carbone.

Notre article « The equity and efficiency trade-off of carbon tax revenue recycling: A re-examination » parait dans Energy Economics : kwnsfk27.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F...

Huge thanks to @emmanuelcombet.bsky.social for leading this work @cired.bsky.social, and to our wonderful co-authors Gaëlle Le Treut and Antoine Teixeira

We find that this recycling scheme is more efficient and equitable than subsidising energy prices for all

We use a general equilibrium model to analyse carbon tax revenue recycling that combines labour tax cuts and targeted transfers to the poorest households

Yellow vest demonstration in Paris in December 2018, Véronique de Viguerie, Getty Images

We study the macroeconomic and distributive impacts of carbon taxation in France

Our paper on the equity and efficiency of carbon tax revenue recycling in France is finally here shorturl.at/4X2Ev

1km grid disposable income per capita in Europe for 2015

I'm thrilled to announce that my latest research, "High-Resolution Downscaling of Disposable Income in Europe Using Open-Source Data," has been published in Earth's Future. 🌍📊
@agu.org

🌍 New paper out!🌍 🧵

As 2024 concludes and 2025 brings a lot of exciting challenges and perspectives, I’m delighted to announce the publication of one of my PhD articles: "International Climate Justice: What the People Think". You can find it at the following link: link.springer.com/article/10.1...

🚨New Paper🚨
Would people support global redistributive policies?
Surveys in 20 countries show strong majority support for:
- global climate policies
- a global wealth tax
- a global democratic assembly
- transfers from high- to low-income countries
1/N

With the correct link: doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad376e

Thanks. Here is the correct link: doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad376e

With the correct link: doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad376e

Merci !

See also our guest post on @carbonbrief.org : t.co/5aAitpB7Le
10/10

Huge thanks to our fabulous team of authors
@bjoernsoergel.bsky.social, Céline Guivarch, Nicolas Taconet, Franziska Piontek and Peron Collins-Sowah
@cired.bsky.social @pik-potsdam.bsky.social @cnrs.bsky.social
9/10

To help decision-makers achieve this, future research must provide inequality metrics whenever appropriate, to build a more robust quantitative assessment of those effects
8/10

At the country level, policy-makers should ensure adaptation and loss and damage funding is directed to low-income households
7/10

The regressivity of climate change impacts calls for targeted compensatory mechanisms through international adaptation finance
6/10

The channels through which this occurs include economy wide effects, decreasing agricultural revenues, and decreasing labour productivity
5/10

These results are valid across all types of physical impacts (temperature, precipitation, sea level rise, extreme events), assessment methods (econometric, simulation, etc), economic sectors and types of inequality (GDP, household income, consumption)
4/10

The evidence gathered from 127 peer reviewed papers shows that climate change impacts increase economic inequalities and disproportionately affect the poor, both globally and within countries on all continents
3/10

We provide the first systematic literature on the issue doi.org/10.1088/10.1...
2/10

You had a hunch climate change impacts would increase economic inequalities? You were right!
1/10