Also, naming for clarity is just one way of naming
My epiphany this morning: It’s a lot easier to name something when you have the scope figured out, when you know what a thing truly is.
Code lines as liability lines
My research also surfaced this how-to for setting up LanguageTool locally on a macOS:
ben.balter.com/2025/01/30/h...
My feed is abuzz with people asking about linters and alternatives to Grammarly. 🐝....
Here are some open source options:
- Harper: writewithharper.com
- LanguageTool: languagetool.org
- Vale: vale.sh
If you know of others, feel free to share!
Something internal for now 😁
Oooo, I was just looking for a docs team owned set of skills yesterday to test something.
Anyone else dream of launching the next wordle and retiring early?
I wonder if new word games like this one get a lot of agent traffic. Excited to try it.
From an engineering community's Slack. That's an engineer wondering. I giggled.
“The IBM 704 could handle only about 4,000 ‘words’ of code in its memory. A good programmer was concise and elegant and never wasted a word. They were poets of bits.”
From “The Secret History of Women in Coding” by Clive Thompson
Curious about the last one. What do you mean by turning speed vs regular speed? Speed to pivot or change something major vs scale?
Want to learn all about web components this week? My 8-hour online course, Web Components Demystified, is on sale for $10 through March 13th. Use the code JUST10
scottjehl.com/learn/webcom...
Use your words.
I keep returning to this question: “How much time was actually saved if you factor in PR review?”
Also, I see a lot of generated PRs abandoned when scrutiny comes because it can be easier to rebuild to understand & test than to fix something.
I maintain that science writing is a form of technical writing.
And that story-driven science writing adapted for young people (and/or the visually inclined) can be a fun, creative form of explaining things.
I wonder if there’s a broader word for technical writing craft now.
This is human earned context in an academic setting. 😆
This is why I like Git version control & ‘git blame’ for understanding the writing/drafting process.
I responded on LinkedIn but sure wish more tech writers were on Bluesky.
Sample bias seems ancient. Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a woman?” comes to mind . . .
A cartoon reminder that tomorrow is World Book Day (In the UK anyway). Originally for the @theguardian.com
This sums up the tech writing edict "Know thy audience"
I’m convinced now tech writers increasingly need more technical expertise so they can spot the plausible but very wrong assertions of LLMs/AI agents.
Reviewing PRs generated by AI can be the worst when no one can answer why certain assertions are made. It can take more expertise to debunk.
Dear article writers, bloggers, and thought leaders: before you ask a diffusion model to barf up a banner image, please just go on one of these archives and pick something nice.
Love this take on using AI strategically to support tasks and learning. 😍
Bibliotherapist
You might be continvoucing someone else, but not me.
#unmorged
Your ability to deeply understand a problem, explore new approaches & iterate all gets kneecapped when you outsource the first draft to AI. Even if you're reviewing/refining the AI output, it doesn't matter; you're not well-equipped to do so because you haven't spent time thinking about the problem.
Legit reason and helpful perspective that just might help me write more myself.
it’s important to keep caring about how things work and how they’re built