J H's Avatar

J H

@jpjh88.bsky.social

Disgruntled Roman Catholic, Retired USAF aircraft mechanic (E-7), Former VA Rating Veteran Service Representative (GS-11). AAS Aerospace Maintenance Technology, BA Criminal Justice, MA Legal Studies. My opinions are my opinions! πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈπŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

823 Followers  |  229 Following  |  3,908 Posts  |  Joined: 19.11.2024  |  2.8941

Latest posts by jpjh88.bsky.social on Bluesky

She voted for this!

07.10.2025 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As a Catholic who has many disagreements with the Catholic Church, I hate having to agree with them!

06.10.2025 04:02 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I am getting tired of Judges reminding DOJ attorneys they are officers of the court! They need to start holding them accountable!

06.10.2025 04:00 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Under what legal authority would you even be pulled over for them to find it?

06.10.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But you could easily drive from Manhattan to PA and buy a gun

06.10.2025 03:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Hearing is concluded

06.10.2025 03:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why do people think Democrats aren't well armed Second Amendment supporters because we simply want background checks and limits of certain arms?

06.10.2025 03:23 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

It's about time you woke up! The irony is MAGA wants the files released the most because they created the entire QANON conspiracy around this very topic, just with dems.

06.10.2025 03:21 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

With discovery and an evidentiary hearing

06.10.2025 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Issue an order to show cause against the DOJ and DOD for trying to circumvent her order!

06.10.2025 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Doubt it but this is the legal system.

06.10.2025 03:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yup

06.10.2025 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait so only California could sue, but they can't establish standing?? WTF garbage is that?

06.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

She is pissed!

06.10.2025 02:59 β€” πŸ‘ 62    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If I was a violent person I would say, 2nd Amendment, but I do not wish that on anyone!

06.10.2025 02:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Well historically the Supreme Court has disregarded the well regulated clause of the Second Amendment and let the second half of the clause apply to all citizens. It's a mess SCOTUS Created for themselves.

06.10.2025 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No the statute wasn't, the rationale of using it was!

06.10.2025 02:48 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not here to argue with ya. When I worked for the VA, answering this was literally part of my job, and in many instances if it fell under Title 32 the Veteran got fucked because Congress never gave approval.

06.10.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And this statute was just dismantled in Oregon last night by a Trump appointed Judge!

06.10.2025 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So if a Texas National Guardsman gets injured in Illinois. Under what statute are they going to be eligible to receive disability benefits? Title 10 or Title 32. Congress has not provided any legislation to allow anything unfer title 10

06.10.2025 02:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Under what statutory authority? That is the problem here! The TX Governor could have said no!

06.10.2025 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It is still the militia of the state of Texas, invading the sovereign state of Illinois without approval of Illinois!

That is a civil war, or a quasi civil war, or whatever other legal term people want to create.

06.10.2025 02:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But only Congress has the authority to call the militia into Federal Service. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Art 1 Sec 8

06.10.2025 02:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes I get that, but there federal legislation dictating how that happened, because under Article I of the Constitution only Congress can call the National Guard (Militia) to federal service.

It's not an executive authority!

06.10.2025 02:36 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

mobilizing their own.

06.10.2025 02:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You get my point! The militia of one state invading another without authority if the state is an act of war. I.e. a civil war!

If the governors of Illinois, California, Oregon, etc couldn't handle an emergency without the help of foreign militias they would request it. Hell here they aren't even

06.10.2025 02:33 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

The Governors control their militias, which is the National Guard! Trump is usurping that Constitutional provision, so if the Fed activates the militia to attack its own state, whose authority do they follow?

06.10.2025 02:30 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Then go take up arms against them!

06.10.2025 02:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also there is no statute that allows for martial law. The statute requires Congress to be in recess and the courts to be closed, when have the courts actually closed?

SCOTUS is literally hearing Merits cases starting tomorrow.

06.10.2025 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Constitutionally there still is. They still have a role, absence is not approval. It takes an ACT OF CONGRESS to do what Miller wants to do!

06.10.2025 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@jpjh88 is following 20 prominent accounts