She voted for this!
07.10.2025 01:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@jpjh88.bsky.social
Disgruntled Roman Catholic, Retired USAF aircraft mechanic (E-7), Former VA Rating Veteran Service Representative (GS-11). AAS Aerospace Maintenance Technology, BA Criminal Justice, MA Legal Studies. My opinions are my opinions! π³οΈβππ³οΈβπππ³οΈββ§οΈπ³οΈββ§οΈ
She voted for this!
07.10.2025 01:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0As a Catholic who has many disagreements with the Catholic Church, I hate having to agree with them!
06.10.2025 04:02 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I am getting tired of Judges reminding DOJ attorneys they are officers of the court! They need to start holding them accountable!
06.10.2025 04:00 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Under what legal authority would you even be pulled over for them to find it?
06.10.2025 03:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But you could easily drive from Manhattan to PA and buy a gun
06.10.2025 03:32 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Hearing is concluded
06.10.2025 03:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Why do people think Democrats aren't well armed Second Amendment supporters because we simply want background checks and limits of certain arms?
06.10.2025 03:23 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0It's about time you woke up! The irony is MAGA wants the files released the most because they created the entire QANON conspiracy around this very topic, just with dems.
06.10.2025 03:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0With discovery and an evidentiary hearing
06.10.2025 03:16 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Issue an order to show cause against the DOJ and DOD for trying to circumvent her order!
06.10.2025 03:16 β π 16 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Doubt it but this is the legal system.
06.10.2025 03:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yup
06.10.2025 03:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Wait so only California could sue, but they can't establish standing?? WTF garbage is that?
06.10.2025 03:01 β π 39 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0She is pissed!
06.10.2025 02:59 β π 62 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If I was a violent person I would say, 2nd Amendment, but I do not wish that on anyone!
06.10.2025 02:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Well historically the Supreme Court has disregarded the well regulated clause of the Second Amendment and let the second half of the clause apply to all citizens. It's a mess SCOTUS Created for themselves.
06.10.2025 02:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No the statute wasn't, the rationale of using it was!
06.10.2025 02:48 β π 12 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not here to argue with ya. When I worked for the VA, answering this was literally part of my job, and in many instances if it fell under Title 32 the Veteran got fucked because Congress never gave approval.
06.10.2025 02:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And this statute was just dismantled in Oregon last night by a Trump appointed Judge!
06.10.2025 02:45 β π 16 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So if a Texas National Guardsman gets injured in Illinois. Under what statute are they going to be eligible to receive disability benefits? Title 10 or Title 32. Congress has not provided any legislation to allow anything unfer title 10
06.10.2025 02:44 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Under what statutory authority? That is the problem here! The TX Governor could have said no!
06.10.2025 02:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It is still the militia of the state of Texas, invading the sovereign state of Illinois without approval of Illinois!
That is a civil war, or a quasi civil war, or whatever other legal term people want to create.
But only Congress has the authority to call the militia into Federal Service. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Art 1 Sec 8
06.10.2025 02:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yes I get that, but there federal legislation dictating how that happened, because under Article I of the Constitution only Congress can call the National Guard (Militia) to federal service.
It's not an executive authority!
mobilizing their own.
06.10.2025 02:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You get my point! The militia of one state invading another without authority if the state is an act of war. I.e. a civil war!
If the governors of Illinois, California, Oregon, etc couldn't handle an emergency without the help of foreign militias they would request it. Hell here they aren't even
The Governors control their militias, which is the National Guard! Trump is usurping that Constitutional provision, so if the Fed activates the militia to attack its own state, whose authority do they follow?
06.10.2025 02:30 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Then go take up arms against them!
06.10.2025 02:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Also there is no statute that allows for martial law. The statute requires Congress to be in recess and the courts to be closed, when have the courts actually closed?
SCOTUS is literally hearing Merits cases starting tomorrow.
Constitutionally there still is. They still have a role, absence is not approval. It takes an ACT OF CONGRESS to do what Miller wants to do!
06.10.2025 02:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0