Day 8: Brilliant experiments that explain voter bias against LGBT candidates, from @gabrielemagni.bsky.social & Andrew Reynolds www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
08.06.2025 21:40 β π 8 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1@gabrielemagni.bsky.social
Professor, chair of the political science department, director of the LGBTQ+ Politics Research Initiative at Loyola Marymount University π³οΈβπ he/him #firstgen
Day 8: Brilliant experiments that explain voter bias against LGBT candidates, from @gabrielemagni.bsky.social & Andrew Reynolds www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
08.06.2025 21:40 β π 8 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1Edmund White, Novelist and Pioneer of Gay Literature, Dies at 85 www.nytimes.com/2025/06/04/a...
04.06.2025 12:54 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And (6) "How Crises Shape Circles of Solidarity: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy" by Jeremy Ferwerda, Gabriele Magni @gabrielemagni.bsky.social , Liesbet Hooghe @liesbethooghe.bsky.social , and Gary Marks
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Interesting data from Pew that pairs nicely with Nathan Chanβs and @gabrielemagni.bsky.socialβs new article in BJPS:
02.06.2025 17:04 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you, Quinn!
18.03.2025 16:31 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Choosing not to run for US Senate in Michigan in 2026 clears a path for Buttigieg for a potential 2028 presidential campaign instead
www.politico.com/news/2025/03...
Interesting new article by Friedman & Scotch in SSQ based on in-depth interviews with 21 candidates with physical disabilities
"Stories From the Trenches: The Difference Disability Makes in the Campaign Experiences of Candidates With Disabilities"
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
BJPolS abstract discussing the political behavior of LGBTQ+ individuals, focusing on community strength and political attitudes. The paper uses data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey among other sources.
#OpenAccess -
The Group-Basis of Political Behaviour among Minoritized Communities: The Case of LGBTQ+ Linked Fate and Sexual and Gender Minorities - cup.org/437Euk4
- Nathan K. Chan & @gabrielemagni.bsky.social
#FirstView
TL;DR: Group identity drives LGBTQ+ political behavior. Linked fate boosts turnout, liberal ideology, & Democratic support
LGBTQ+ voters are a key electoral bloc
11/11
Future studies should further explore political diversity within LGBTQ+ communities
They should explore barriers to voting, especially for trans individuals, who face ID & legal hurdles. Lower turnout in this group suggests systemic challenges
10/n
LGBTQ+ voters already leaned Democratic in 2020, but those with high linked fate were 3 percentage points more likely to vote for Biden
9/n
LGBTQ+ individuals with stronger linked fate are 8 percentage points more likely to identify as strong Democrats
GOP alignment is much lower in this group
8/n
LGBTQ+ linked fate correlates with liberal ideology
Even controlling for demographics and political attitudes, those with high linked fate lean significantly more liberal
7/n
LGBTQ+ voters with a strong sense of linked fate are more likely to vote
We found a 29 percentage point gap in turnout between those with high vs. low linked fate
6/n
LGBTQ+ linked fate is strongest among white, cisgender, gay and lesbian individuals, as well as those who have experienced discrimination
5/n
We develop the empirical analysis with an oversample of βΌ2,000 LGBTQ+ Americans from the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey
4/n
We examine both the determinants of LGBTQ+ linked and its political consequences, including its impact on ideology, party ID, voter turnout, and vote choice
3/n
LGBTQ+ political behavior is shaped by group identity
Building on work in race and ethnic politics, we develop the concept of "LGBTQ+ linked fate," showing how a shared sense of destiny influences voting and ideology
2/n
Happy to see this article with Nathan Chan out in @bjpols.bsky.social
We propose "LGBTQ+ linked fate" to explain the consistent political behavior of the LGBTQ+ community despite its internal diversity
We use a sample of βΌ2,000 LGBTQ+ Americans from CMPS
1/n
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
3 Convicted of Murder for Luring Men From Gay Bars to Their Deaths www.nytimes.com/2025/02/10/n...
10.02.2025 21:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Apply to the APSAβs Kenneth Sherrill Prize
β’ For grad students working on LGBTQ+ politics
β’ Recognizes best dissertation proposal for empirical study of LGBTQ politics
β’ $1,000 prize
β’ Deadline: 12 Feb 2025
(named after Ken Sherrill, pioneering LGBTQ politics scholar)
apsanet.org/programs/aps...
Interesting new article using data from Norwegian lottery winnings to challenge the causal relationship between affluence and turnout
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Is Pete Buttigieg (now a Michigan resident) going to run?
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/u...
Scott Bessent, a Wall Street veteran and campaign megadonor, was confirmed as Treasury secretary in a 68-29 vote
He becomes the highest-ranking openly LGBTQ+ official in American history
go.politicoemail.com?qs=b5c46439e...
Thank you, Quinn!
19.12.2024 23:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0LGBTQ+ elected officials are resilient, but these findings highlight the need for systemic change to support their mental health and ensure equitable representation
8/end
70% of the LGBTQ+ elected officials wanted counseling in the past year, but nearly half couldnβt access it.
Barriers include counselors lacking LGBTQ+ understanding and concerns about political weaponization.
7/n
[3] Low LGBTQ+ Representation
46% say the pressure of needing to be a key voice for the LGBTQ+ community negatively impacts their mental health. 31% cite lacking a strong LGBTQ+ peer network, and 18% struggle with the absence of role models.
6/n
[2] Anti-LGBTQ+ Rhetoric and Attacks
47% have heard anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric from colleagues and 49% have faced anti-LGBTQ+ social media attacks. This rhetoric and attacks negatively impact the mental health of 39% and 32% of LGBTQ+ elected officials, respectively.
5/n