At wall st? The story there is given the street was getting storm, water, and utility upgrades, could we include the intersection in the project for transportation safety as well?
The answer was yes, but budget constraints meant slip lane stayed.
At wall st? The story there is given the street was getting storm, water, and utility upgrades, could we include the intersection in the project for transportation safety as well?
The answer was yes, but budget constraints meant slip lane stayed.
It's hard to describe the feeling of not being able to stop our leaders from repeating 2003, except 1000 times worse, while Congress is doing less than nothing to stop this madman.
We'll keep doing the work locally, but this illegal war stains us all.
Keep speaking up. Americans don't want this.
This Shabbos, I’m praying for all of the innocent civilians - especially innocent Iranian civilians - who are going to suffer because of the warmongering of Trump and Netanyahu.
28.02.2026 16:52 — 👍 92 🔁 19 💬 2 📌 1
“The lives of courageous American heroes may be lost. That often happens in war.”
It is as if he shrugs his shoulders and says, “Oh well.”
Disgusting and impeachable.
Agreed! And just this week council gave direction to use $1.2m in one-time revenue to pursue those kinds of projects. I was pleased to see support to increase it from $600k. More details to come.
27.02.2026 16:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A raised crosswalk on the OSU-Cascades campus. Blue sky with white clouds and tree silhouettes are visible. A sidewalk lies on either side of dark gray pavement.
Blue sky and white clouds with trees in the background frame a raised intersection, visible in light gray concrete in the center. Four streets or perhaps drive aisles are visible on the sides. Lightposts appear on either side.
OSU-Cascades has added new surface parking. These raised crosswalks and raised intersection will make crossings safer.
I expect to start seeing more of these around town starting this year.
Twilight sky with city street lights illuminating a streetscape. Centered is a separated bike path with a white bike stencil. A motor vehicle travel lane is on the left and a sidewalk is on the right. Railroad tracks are visible in the foreground.
Coming back from the advisory body summit last night I got to ride through the new Olney. It was great to have separated space to drive, ride, walk, and wheel!
27.02.2026 15:51 — 👍 73 🔁 9 💬 3 📌 0City of Bend Advisory Body Summit. Let's see what the next year holds.
27.02.2026 00:52 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0A small sized silver truck with a mini yellow snowplow on the front. A brown building is visible in the background.
That’s even cooler than this little snowplow truck I saw on the OSU-Cascades campus today
26.02.2026 05:35 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Ironic that Hakeem Jeffries' advice to the Democratic caucus tonight was to maintain "decorum."
This is exactly what Mike Johnson threw out Al Green for last year. Green showed tremendous political courage again tonight. Democrats should take note.
Basically TikTok, I guess...
24.02.2026 00:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I asked my class of 29 students which social media platforms they use and none of them knew what BlueSky is
23.02.2026 23:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Looks like it's about 35% of total Berkshire Hathaway assets
23.02.2026 03:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0BlueSky is publicly searchable. I wonder if that would meet the definition of that statute.
22.02.2026 22:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
A discount for residents could mean they continue to pay current rates, or current rates could go down for residents.
Revenue could fund on-demand microtransit or circulating shuttles.
Downtown Bend Business Association recently asked the city to consider charging for curb parking as part of an overall strategy to manage curb access. Modeling suggests different rates for visitors and residents could generate significant net revenue, even accounting for administrative costs
21.02.2026 17:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
Bend visitors should pay a higher rate to park. Residents should get a discount.
Residents already pay local property taxes and the transportation utility fee. State gas taxes are allocated based on population w/o accounting for visitors.
That would be a great one! Measuring transportation safety is HARD.
Property damage-only (PDO) crashes are another indicator: if you are walking and you see debris, you know it's not safe. But PDO crashes are only recorded if damage is >$2.5k, and even then reports weigh them less
@davidzipper.bsky.social is right: the flaw with deaths & injuries per VMT is that if people drive more, it looks like safety is improving even though the same (or more!) people are dying. It's the deaths & injuries that matter.
And increased VMTs is bad for traffic, parking, pollution, costs, etc.
Advice for transportation policymakers:
1) Fed gov't requires that MPOs use deaths & serious injuries per VMT for reporting purposes. BUT you can track the per capita figure for local performance metrics.
2) Fatal crashes and serious injury crashes are typically very similar. Both are impt to track.
“We have all been here before
We have all been here before…”
Yep. Also it's bizarre that The Economist says CA's billionaire tax would "only" raise 2% of its annual output. That is a ton of money! And why is annual output the right metric, as opposed to percent of general fund which would be significantly higher?
19.02.2026 19:14 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
the worry about higher taxes destroying (or "distorting") the economy must consider that
A) people at the bottom aren't seeing the benefits of economic growth and
B) vast inequality itself is also a threat to the economy (let alone democracy as you point out!)
Go Hunter Hess! Your hometown city council is proudly cheering you on.
19.02.2026 18:02 — 👍 21 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0And that was back when the average number of people per car was 1.75!
18.02.2026 15:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Mythbusters was such a great show!!
17.02.2026 22:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Because it is defined as traveling over the posted limit (which might be already very high) or because we just aren't very good at knowing actual vehicle speeds at the moment of a crash?
17.02.2026 17:16 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The mechanisms are different. The most widely-cited study is now 2 decades old and showed cell-phone users had more rear-end crashes. More recent research suggests there are similar effects, though I didn't find a simulation like this one. rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/17718
17.02.2026 17:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Table titled "TABLE 1. 2014-2018 AND 2019-2023 FATAL AND SERIOUS CRASH ATTRIBUTE COMPARISON" Columns are titled Attribute, Number of Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes for 2014 - 2018 and 2019-2023, Percent Increase between the two periods, Proportion of Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes, and Proportion Change. A red box shows that Crashes involving Distracted Drivers increased 116% (806 to 1,737) between the two time periods.
The number of Oregon fatal crashes attributed to distracted driving has more than doubled in recent years. I suspect reporting isn't even capturing the full effect.
Table is from DKS June 2025 memo updating Oregon TSAP.
A man with one hand on a steering wheel and in his right hand he is holding a green beer bottle
You would be freaked out if you saw 25% of drivers drinking a beer, right?
Using a phone is no different.